Jump to content

That Loss Was On Buck but Wilson must go


Rene88

Recommended Posts

Who's spot is most precarious on 40-man? Tyler Wilson!

Keep Asher, option Wilson and then DFA Wilson for Fister or Lewis (here's a link on that topic: https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2017/04/cafardos-latest-braun-mariners-diamondbacks-red-sox-fister.html?fv-home=true&post-id=90154)

or whatever dumpster diving you find for him, I have seen enough of both Wilson and Wright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The constant need to say every loss was "on" someone or to pinpoint blame is annoying. Sometimes you just lose.

If there's such a thing as a loss you can shrug off, that was the very definition of it. The Orioles were using a minor-league fifth-starter callup and went up against a very good pitcher. They probably couldn't use O'Day, Brach, or Britton because they'd all pitched two days in a row, so they had a thin bullpen. Entering the game, nobody would've been surprised or especially upset by an Orioles loss under those circumstances. At least they made it exciting at the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PaulFolk said:

The constant need to say every loss was "on" someone or to pinpoint blame is annoying. Sometimes you just lose.

If there's such a thing as a loss you can shrug off, that was the very definition of it. The Orioles were using a minor-league fifth-starter callup and went up against a very good pitcher. They probably couldn't use O'Day, Brach, or Britton because they'd all pitched two days in a row, so they had a thin bullpen. Entering the game, nobody would've been surprised or especially upset by an Orioles loss under those circumstances. At least they made it exciting at the end.

Leaving a 4apitcher in with the game on the line in the bottom of the 9th is annoying. 

Sounds like you have low standards in general. That's fine, but when you got the Blue Jays on the ropes, you go for the KO.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going into Toronto with the potential of winning 3 out of 4 is great. I think Givens could have been used there but the more I think about it, it's not a big deal. We have Bundy going tomorrow with basically a fully rested bullpen now and a day off Monday.

Get the W tomorrow and travel to Cinci for a HR show from our guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rene88 said:

Leaving a 4apitcher in with the game on the line in the bottom of the 9th is annoying. 

Sounds like you have low standards in general. That's fine, but when you got the Blue Jays on the ropes, you go for the KO.

 

There is no good option in that situation. Take Wilson out of the game and burn Brach. Then your best case scenario is a tie game with Brach and Wilson out of the game and Nuno is your only available guy against a RH hitting team. No thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aristotelian said:

There is no good option in that situation. Take Wilson out of the game and burn Brach. Then your best case scenario is a tie game with Brach and Wilson out of the game and Nuno is your only available guy against a RH hitting team. No thanks.

If you get a run the next inning, it's all worth it.

Agree to disagree sir. Respect your opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Rene88 said:

Who's spot is most precarious on 40-man? Tyler Wilson!

Keep Asher, option Wilson and then DFA Wilson for Fister or Lewis (here's a link on that topic: https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2017/04/cafardos-latest-braun-mariners-diamondbacks-red-sox-fister.html?fv-home=true&post-id=90154)

or whatever dumpster diving you find for him, I have seen enough of both Wilson and Wright.

Why does Fister keep getting mentioned with the 40 man? He would be a minor league deal and would need a few starts in the minors before even possibly making the MLB roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rene88 said:

Leaving a 4apitcher in with the game on the line in the bottom of the 9th is annoying. 

Sounds like you have low standards in general. That's fine, but when you got the Blue Jays on the ropes, you go for the KO.

 

I don't think I said anything about having low standards. But you have to look at the situation realistically. The Orioles' three best relievers were unavailable, and Hart had already been used. That leaves Wilson, Nuno, and Givens (and even Givens might've needed some rest too). I would've gone with Givens if he was available, but chances are either Wilson or Nuno would've ended up in the game eventually if it had gone to extras.

I get being annoyed at Wilson, but I don't blame Buck for using him there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eddie83 said:

Wilson isn't a late game reliever. This isn't his spot we all know that including the manager. He is a long man.  

Yes, and under normal circumstances, he wouldn't be a late game reliever. But these weren't normal circumstances. All the go-to late game relievers (except maybe Givens) were unavailable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PaulFolk said:

Yes, and under normal circumstances, he wouldn't be a late game reliever. But these weren't normal circumstances. All the go-to late game relievers (except maybe Givens) were unavailable.

Exactly, I am agreeing with you. I don't know where Givens was.  He was willing to use Brach with a lead for an inning.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...