Jump to content

How can your major job to report on O's baseball....


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 minutes ago, Larry18 said:

Are you sure they used an option in 2015? 

Gausman was optioned twice in 2015 for a total of 26 days.  

http://www.tsn.ca/mlb/player-bio/kevin-gausman/bio

He was eligible for a 4th option in 2016 but it was not used.  The 4th option expires after one year.

From Cot's

  • A player may be eligible for a fourth option year if he has been optioned in three seasons but does not yet have five full seasons of professional experience. A full season is defined as being on an active pro roster for at least 90 days in a season. The 90-day requirement means short-season leagues (New-York Penn, Northwest, Pioneer, Appalachian, Gulf Coast, Arizona Rookie, Dominican and Venezuelan Summer Leagues) do not count as full seasons for the purposes of determining eligibility for a fourth option.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, just got this from someone in the O's management. 

On whether Gausman has an option still.

"Yes, he has one remaining. He has a 4th option because prior to the commencement of the 2017 season,he had less than 5 seasons at the ML and Mil levels combined."

So maybe, just maybe a guy as connected to the Orioles as Bordick may actually know something about this stuff?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Roster Resource is always on point.  They even know the SP's when they are TBD.  

They say Gausman has an option remaining.  

https://www.rosterresource.com/mlb-baltimore-orioles

This kind of stuff just gets me. I literally go out and get the information directly from the Orioles yet people are still posting stuff like this is still debatable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My apologies to Mr Bordick and every one else.   I did not interpret the rule correctly.   

Gausman will not have 5 professional seasons in according to the rules until early July.  So he can be optioned until that time.

Thanks Tony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, wildcard said:

I listen and read these guys for new information about the O's.  When I read stuff like this I just shake my head and wonder how they can be this close to the O's organization and not understand what is going on.

You rely on Mike Bordick for new information about the Orioles?   Really? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

Fair and balanced. Roch too,

They have very different jobs.    Roch's job is to obtain news about the team and report it accurately.    Bordick's job is to comment on what is happening in games as they are ongoing.     He's not very good at that job, but that's beside the point.    He's the last guy I'd expect to be on top of the nuances of who has options and that sort of trivia.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

They have very different jobs.    Roch's job is to obtain news about the team and report it accurately.    Bordick's job is to comment on what is happening in games as they are ongoing.     He's not very good at that job, but that's beside the point.    He's the last guy I'd expect to be on top of the nuances of who has options and that sort of trivia.     

Yet he was right in this case.   Good for Bordick.   And I say that as another person who would really prefer to not listen to him on the broadcast if possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Yet he was right in this case.   Good for Bordick.   And I say that as another person who would really prefer to not listen to him on the broadcast if possible.

I have heard Bordick on the radio talk about the Orioles. He seems much more honest and witty and knowledgeable.. He goes on to the color broadcaster  side and becomes not very interesting or insightful. Not sure why he changes on TV. Wish he would be like in his interviews on the radio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, wildcard said:

Gausman was optioned twice in 2015 for a total of 26 days.  

http://www.tsn.ca/mlb/player-bio/kevin-gausman/bio

He was eligible for a 4th option in 2016 but it was not used.  The 4th option expires after one year.

From Cot's

  • A player may be eligible for a fourth option year if he has been optioned in three seasons but does not yet have five full seasons of professional experience. A full season is defined as being on an active pro roster for at least 90 days in a season. The 90-day requirement means short-season leagues (New-York Penn, Northwest, Pioneer, Appalachian, Gulf Coast, Arizona Rookie, Dominican and Venezuelan Summer Leagues) do not count as full seasons for the purposes of determining eligibility for a fourth option.

Is this a new rule under the new CBA?     I've never heard it before.       If this rule had been in effect last year, Bundy would have been eligible to be optioned, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

This kind of stuff just gets me. I literally go out and get the information directly from the Orioles yet people are still posting stuff like this is still debatable. 

I'm curious, how is this stuff officially tracked? I assume at the league level there is some sort of database that only teams have access to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Frobby said:

They have very different jobs.    Roch's job is to obtain news about the team and report it accurately.    Bordick's job is to comment on what is happening in games as they are ongoing.     He's not very good at that job, but that's beside the point.    He's the last guy I'd expect to be on top of the nuances of who has options and that sort of trivia.     

Actually, he's a guy I would trust a lot because of his access to team officials, Buck and the coaching staff. Let's not forget, Bordick is still basically a coach for the organization and although we can spend all day critiquing his announcing style, he' still very much up on what's happening with the club. He may not always come across this way on the telecasts, but he's a smart guy who spends a lot of time around the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Over the 35.33 innings of his last six starts, Dean Kremer has given up only 10 earned runs for an ERA of 2.55. In four of those starts, he's gone 6 to 6.33 innings.
    • I'm glad he's on our side.
    • Thanks for sharing. I've been wanting to see something just like this about Felix.
    • Oooooh. Didn't expect that recall. I'm excited to see it! Bruce has been grinding it out a long time in Norfolk. He started the season looking good, and he started 2022 looking good against Major League talent. Can he peform in June 2023 the way that he performed in April 2022? I hope so. I'm here to see it! I like the idea of left handed starters. Because we have none in the rotation and I want to see 2 good ones sprinkled in. I've got my popcorn, and I'm looking forward to seeing what Bruce Zimmerman can do!
    • Let's start with Ramirez... 1) He'll be 31 in September 2) He's signed thru 2028 3) There is $105M remaining on his contract for 2024-28, for baseball ages 31-35 (he'll be 36 when the contract ends 4) His power production has dropped dramatically in 2023 despite the fact his FB rate has increased 5) His overall offensive production is the lowest it has been since 2015 (age 22) I think the Indians might be happy to offload this contract if they could find a taker to give them some minimal value for it and they are not in contention. My conclusion: If the Orioles like him for the money over the next 5 years, he might be worth a 3-for-1 exchange of truly unknow prospect potential, but not Westburg, Cowser, or GrayRod.  Think 1 of Prieto OR Willems plus 2 more hard throwers from Delmarva.  I would be seriously concerned about how a contract like Ramirez' would constrain the Orioles from signing Rutschman or Henderson to the sort of extension that will make them career Orioles.  Just like in football, where fans are tossing out 2nd round draft picks like they were party favors, I really dislike trading any top 100 prospect and certainly not one that comes with a strong possibility for an over-market priced contract. Bieber... 1) He's 28 as of 5/31 2) This is his worst season since his rookie year with a depressed K rate, increased BB and over 1 hit/IP, but he's still hanging in with an ERA that is somewhat better than the league average. 3) He's making $10M this season and will have his final year of arbitration prior to 2024, which makes the cost of him with a 1.5 year horizon bearable if you can assume he'll maintain his current 110 ERA+.  In addition, given the short horizon and age, that's a much smaller risk than for Ramirez. 4) This is where ME and his team come in to see if they can identify WHY he's not pitching nearly as well this season in addition to the obvious "Will he put the Orioles over the top?" My conclusion: Bieber may well be sought after, but I wouldn't trade any of Westburg, Cowser, or GrayRod for him.  I'd probably be willing to trade either Rom OR Ortiz plus another couple of live arms from the lower minors.  Westburg plus 2 Delmarva arms for both Ramirez and Bieber would be an enormous risk (see Ramirez), but I could get behind it if ME and team have decided he won't be nearly the offensive threat he is now in Camden Yards.
    • I have no idea how the management works here.  I think the Chris Davis fiasco is still a constant shadow. However, we're tied for the second most wins in all of baseball.  Which is astounding given our stat line.  The Giants stats are almost identical to ours and they're a game under 500.  That's where our stats say we should be.   So something else is going on.  I don't think management is going to mess with the chemistry,  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...