Jump to content

For the first 2 rounds...


Better selections for us?  

44 members have voted

  1. 1. Better selections for us?

    • Matusz and Avery
      6
    • Smoak and Melville
      38


Recommended Posts

This is not a fair comparison - mostly because you are spending so much $ on the two consensus first rounders.

Let's see if or where Jordan decides to bust slot and then we can have a debate.

But Smoak wasn't considered a tough sign or a guy that was going to take some huge contract.

Melville is a guy that he could have busted slot for, so I am not sure your argument there.

And it is fair...We had the chance to draft both of these guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But Smoak wasn't considered a tough sign or a guy that was going to take some huge contract.

Melville is a guy that he could have busted slot for, so I am not sure your argument there.

And it is fair...We had the chance to draft both of these guys.

The way Melville's free falling, there's a good chance he'll be there when we pick in the 3rd Round.

Don't forget we got Arrieta in the 5th Round last year.

/would've drafted Smoak AND Melville

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way Melville's free falling, there's a good chance he'll be there when we pick in the 3rd Round.

Don't forget we got Arrieta in the 5th Round last year.

/would've drafted Smoak AND Melville

Yes, this is possible but then you may not get another guy you could have had/wanted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering Avery probably could have been had in the 5th round I don't think that's an excuse...

It appears every service had Avery in their top 65 - some higher.

Stop with the hyperbole and sky is falling mentality already.

If you want to be negative, at least try to be factual/realistic. This guy is a legit round two talent according to every service posted here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...