Jump to content

Orioles Sign Ryan O'Rourke


wildbillhiccup

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

I'm pissing my pants laughing. Only 10 more months of this fool GM. 

Yes, only idiot GMs sign players to minor league deals in order to have organizational depth. The great GMs only make big signings and awesome trades. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
9 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

I'm pissing my pants laughing. Only 10 more months of this fool GM. 

You know we start spring with like a 50 man roster right. Plus we do have to staff AAA and AA with some vets.

I bet you said the same thing about when we signed Brian Duensing. He was pretty good for us that year and then flat out a beast for the Cubs the next. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Gentlemen, and in some cases I use the word loosely, I set the bar high for this organization and to see a signing  like this to start the offseason as not only disappointing but pathetic. Scrap heap pitchers for minor league depth are a dime a dozen. From this vantage point, it looks like this is going to be another dumpster fire offseason when instead we need an aggressive agenda to get this franchise on the right track for the long term. So if you think a bunch of Roarke signings do it for you, then God Bless. Enjoy another year at the bottom. Personally, I look forward to the day Duquette hits the bricks.

Nobody is saying that signing guys like O’Rourke (not Roarke) is sufficient.  But there’s absolutely nothing pathetic about signing guys like this to MiL deals.   Every team in baseball does it.    Especially, you see a lot of this early in the offseason before the bigger action starts.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Gentlemen, and in some cases I use the word loosely, I set the bar high for this organization and to see a signing  like this to start the offseason as not only disappointing but pathetic. Scrap heap pitchers for minor league depth are a dime a dozen. From this vantage point, it looks like this is going to be another dumpster fire offseason when instead we need an aggressive agenda to get this franchise on the right track for the long term. So if you think a bunch of Roarke signings do it for you, then God Bless. Enjoy another year at the bottom. Personally, I look forward to the day Duquette hits the bricks.

I am very glad you are not the GM for this team, I would be very scared to see the results.

How the heck did you survive in this town, back in the Syd Thrift end of his era?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Gentlemen, and in some cases I use the word loosely, I set the bar high for this organization and to see a signing  like this to start the offseason as not only disappointing but pathetic. Scrap heap pitchers for minor league depth are a dime a dozen. From this vantage point, it looks like this is going to be another dumpster fire offseason when instead we need an aggressive agenda to get this franchise on the right track for the long term. So if you think a bunch of Roarke signings do it for you, then God Bless. Enjoy another year at the bottom. Personally, I look forward to the day Duquette hits the bricks.

This is a tired, pointless talking point every off season.  If the front office was selling this as a "major addition", then by all means get mad.  It's not, and I know I'm not the only one who doesn't want to hear this stuff after every depth signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Gentlemen, and in some cases I use the word loosely, I set the bar high for this organization and to see a signing  like this to start the offseason as not only disappointing but pathetic. Scrap heap pitchers for minor league depth are a dime a dozen. From this vantage point, it looks like this is going to be another dumpster fire offseason when instead we need an aggressive agenda to get this franchise on the right track for the long term. So if you think a bunch of Roarke signings do it for you, then God Bless. Enjoy another year at the bottom. Personally, I look forward to the day Duquette hits the bricks.

You clearly don't understand how the baseball offseason works. Pretty sad, actually. It's pretty easy to figure out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Gentlemen, and in some cases I use the word loosely, I set the bar high for this organization and to see a signing  like this to start the offseason as not only disappointing but pathetic. Scrap heap pitchers for minor league depth are a dime a dozen. From this vantage point, it looks like this is going to be another dumpster fire offseason when instead we need an aggressive agenda to get this franchise on the right track for the long term. So if you think a bunch of Roarke signings do it for you, then God Bless. Enjoy another year at the bottom. Personally, I look forward to the day Duquette hits the bricks.

busstare.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Gentlemen, and in some cases I use the word loosely, I set the bar high for this organization and to see a signing  like this to start the offseason as not only disappointing but pathetic. Scrap heap pitchers for minor league depth are a dime a dozen. From this vantage point, it looks like this is going to be another dumpster fire offseason when instead we need an aggressive agenda to get this franchise on the right track for the long term. So if you think a bunch of Roarke signings do it for you, then God Bless. Enjoy another year at the bottom. Personally, I look forward to the day Duquette hits the bricks.

kUAT0fz.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, phillyOs119 said:

These types of signings can’t be bad, super low risk, fairly low reward type move.

The guy has been great against lefties, it’s nice to have a guy like that as AAA depth.

Also on the GM note, you realize that until there is a change in organizational philosophy (that comes from above the GM) the Orioles are not going to operate the way a lot of fans/analysts/commentators would prefer they operate.

I have always wondered if Mr. Angelos actually has an organizational philosophy and, if so, what is it exactly? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tntoriole said:

I have always wondered if Mr. Angelos actually has an organizational philosophy and, if so, what is it exactly? 

I don't know but over the course of multiple GMs I've seen...

- Refusal to be a serious player in the international amateur market

- Refusal to sign a pitcher to a long term deal

- Refusal to seriously negotiate extensions until player has a breakout and is now expensive

- Refusal to have a clear power structure in the warehouse

- Refusal to have a serious sell off 

It's not all bad, Mr. Angelos will run a solid payroll and seems committed to putting a good product on the field.  He's not a cheapskate as often claimed. 

I just think he should put a baseball person he trusts in charge of all baseball operations, give that person a budget, and leave that person alone.  He shouldn't be caving to Scott Boras sales pitches, he should be saying nice presentation, but that decision is up to my GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, phillyOs119 said:

I don't know but over the course of multiple GMs I've seen...

- Refusal to be a serious player in the international amateur market

- Refusal to sign a pitcher to a long term deal

- Refusal to seriously negotiate extensions until player has a breakout and is now expensive

- Refusal to have a clear power structure in the warehouse

- Refusal to have a serious sell off 

It's not all bad, Mr. Angelos will run a solid payroll and seems committed to putting a good product on the field.  He's not a cheapskate as often claimed. 

I just think he should put a baseball person he trusts in charge of all baseball operations, give that person a budget, and leave that person alone.  He shouldn't be caving to Scott Boras sales pitches, he should be saying nice presentation, but that decision is up to my GM.

I think he has expectations of his GMs that have been unrealistic.  I think he has hired excellent GMs- Pat Gillick, Andy, DD and he has hired terrible GMs, but I think beginning with Andy, that he has been much less hands on than he was in all the preceding regimes.   But negative refusals often seems to be  a choice as to whether he trusts the GM at the moment or does he base it on his own previous experience.   Having said that, I think both Andy and DD have had much relative independent decision authority than any of those prior GMs and that they can more fairly be held responsible for their choices made within their budgets without just blaming ownership. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Gentlemen, and in some cases I use the word loosely, I set the bar high for this organization and to see a signing  like this to start the offseason as not only disappointing but pathetic. Scrap heap pitchers for minor league depth are a dime a dozen. From this vantage point, it looks like this is going to be another dumpster fire offseason when instead we need an aggressive agenda to get this franchise on the right track for the long term. So if you think a bunch of Roarke signings do it for you, then God Bless. Enjoy another year at the bottom. Personally, I look forward to the day Duquette hits the bricks.

Sir, and I use that word intentionally.  Setting a high bar is something I am comfortable saying that almost every single one of us has.  That said, we all have different opinions regarding how that bar can be reached and even sometimes what the impediments are to achieving said goal.  Your post seems childish, not because it expresses disdain for the GM and the move, but because it implies that the signing is the high point of the offseason.  You want DD gone.  Ok you made your point.  You are not alone in that thought, but I do not share that opinion necessarily.  But if you would like your opinions to be taken seriously, I would suggest that in the future, maybe you offer them with more grounded reason than presented above.  The O'Roarke move most certainly will not take the O's to the promised land.  But on all counts, it seems like a well constructed depth move for the organization.  And if you were merely trying to make a joke, most here are accustomed to "Print the playoff tickets now..."

Good luck and I hope my feedback is taken without offense.  Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...