Jump to content

Jordan talks about his 2008 draft class


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Good read. I have the same view as Mr. Jordan in that I think skill sets are more exciting than anything else in the draft. It allows for more versatility in how you potentially use the draftees, and often times gives more room for development and potentially a higher ceiling.

I think it was a strong class and look forward to how it shapes up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a top-notch article, Tony. I'm looking forward to hearing what Jordan had to say about some of our picks. I'd love to know (now that the draft is over) how Jordan would have ranked the top 8-10 guys in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent work Tony! Let's hope this Jordan draft produces as well as some of the other's have. Interesting picks early on, but good second day picks (and signings already) may be where the success of this draft will come from. Jordan's really showing through this draft how this club is in rebuilding mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In other words, a once in a lifetime pitcher and SS.

Right, let's judge him on that. :rolleyestf:

Well, eventually, he should be judged on that. About 2 players a year eventually become hall of famers. That means an average personnel guy should get one every 15 years. An outstanding personnel guy ought to be able to pick one a bit more often.

I'll be at Wieters' induction in 2033 and Matusz's in 2034....and at Jordan's, whenever that will be! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for getting this up so quickly.

I must say I wish the light he shed on the specifics of the evaluation process came from a higher wattage bulb. After reading this article, I remain mostly baffled by his actual choices although confirmation that AM lets him do his job without interference is very welcome news.

I look forward to more draft news in the future. I'm beginning to get excited by the prospects of future Orioles teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great stuff, Tony.

Always great to get this first-hand info straight from JJ.

I liked our draft last week and it is growing on me. Jordan planted several seeds with this class. Not sure which ones will come to fruition, but there's some confidence that we'll get our share of major leaguers out it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fine article. (I didn't know they taught writing in the Army ;-)

My favorite parts:

One of the lingering questions going into the draft was whether Orioles President of Baseball Operations Andy MacPhail had influenced Jordan in any way to pick a college pitcher over a hitter. Jordan quickly put that to rest.

"This was my call all the way. No one influenced me. I was told repeatedly 'take who you want, we'll support you.' People need to understand I made the call. Good, bad or indifferent, it was mine."

"I always say, be happier with what you get, don't worry about with what you didn't get."
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Works for me,  as long as the first piece is a Norby type!  Only one of Ortiz/Westburg/Cowser/Kjerstad should be traded for Cease.  Let them pick one of them and a couple in the 8-15 range then a lottery pick or two if needed.  But giving up 2 of those is to pricy for the return.  I like Cease, but personally value him as a very solid #3 starter.  Sure, he COULD perform better than that,  but I wouldn't bet on it.  Maybe he reverts back to his 2022 form, but I think it more likely that what we get is what we saw from him in 2023, with an improvement in numbers due to the defense behind him. 
    • Exited about this kid and the future of our international signings. We have to remember the initial reporting don’t mean a whole lot. We’ve had success in the 100-500 k range too.
    • Downtown restaurants should like this too.  Much better for any local entertainment venues.
    • Cease is a solid MLB starting pitcher with 2 years of control  who's team has clearly made it known that he's available.  Of course there is a lot of interest.  There is a lot of interest in the Orioles' prospects, as well.  Fans of both teams are hopeful that their team will get maximum value for their assets in any trade.  I'm sure that it is sometimes difficult for GMs to reach a meeting of the minds on a player's value, in which case they need to work out a restructure of the discussed deal that may not include that player.  I think Elias' opinion on Ortiz is likely to be pretty close to what posters on this site are telling you.  If the White Sox GM views Ortiz as you do, it would seem that a deal between the two teams would most likely not have Ortiz included.  I'm sure that isn't all that unusual and the GMs just turn the page and look at working out a trade involving other players/prospects.  What confuses me is that you seem to rate Ortiz lower than we do and lower than the various sites rate him, but would like a trade of Cease for Cowser and Ortiz.  I'm against that deal because I think 2 prospects rated that highly would be an overpay.  It seems to me, you agree.  You simply rate Ortiz lower.  Seems to me that the answer in such an impasse that would make both parties happy would be to replace Ortiz with another prospect that is lower rated than Ortiz -- which would be of equal value in your mind, since you rate Ortiz lower and still think the proposed trade is a fair one.  Make sense?  Maybe replace Ortiz with Norby.
    • I would definitely do Westburg  and Cowser.
    • 100% agree with you.  Especially when you haves waves of prospects coming up behind these guys.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...