Jump to content

Good Week for A Sale?


mdbdotcom

Recommended Posts

Posted

The Winter Meetings are here, and the O's are already out of contention. It's hard to see how adding any combination of available starting pitchers (other than maybe both Darvish and Cobb) makes this team a contender.  So, maybe it's time for the owners to make 2018 a transition year.

Starting at the Winter Meetings, let's sell a bunch of players who are 30+ and/or won't be with the team when we next compete for the best prospects we can get. Here's my For Sale list:

  • Richard Bleier
  • Brad Brach
  • Zach Britton
  • Darren O’Day
  • Manny Machado
  • Adam Jones
  • Mark Trumbo

Will they find buyers for all those players? Probably not. I didn't include Caleb Joseph because it will probably make the season a little more bearable to have a veteran catcher on hand. He can also serve as a mentor to Sisco/Wynns. And I didn't include Chris Davis because he is worth less than dirt. I left Schoop out for the slim chance that we could extend him.

Ideally we would already have in place the GM who will oversee the rebuild, but that isn't the case. So Duquette's task will have to be clear. Sell for the best prospects you can get.

Then we'll have a whole season to find a new GM who will oversee the rebuild and hire a manager he/she can work with who understands that we are in the 21st century. Once we dump some of those contracts, maybe we can also bring enough modern-thinking baseball people into the front office to have it function more like the really good teams do. We seem to be out-manned in every area from development to advanced scouting to turning analytics into action. Getting rid of one Mark Trumbo contract can make room for a whole lot of really good baseball people throughout the system -- this is not to say that we don't have some really good baseball people on board, we just don't have enough of them functioning as a winning team, seamless from warehouse to clubhouse.

We do have some promising talent that is MLB ready or close to it, and we should get pretty good returns for some of the players we would sell, so maybe the O's won't have to wait four or five yeas before putting a competitive team on the field again. That's my hope, anyway. Am I dreaming?

 

Posted

Yeah, with the way things have gone in the last week, it's time.  Move them while they still have value.  Just pray that DD does a helluva better job on the return take than Thrift did in 2000. 

Posted

it has been absolutely obvious for well over a year now that the time to sell was yesterday. Yes, its time to sell. The events of the last week have made it where only a clowns crew would continue with this "go for it in 2018" malarkey. That's why I expect the O's to sell nobody, and go for it in 2018.

Posted
29 minutes ago, theobird said:

it has been absolutely obvious for well over a year now that the time to sell was yesterday. Yes, its time to sell. The events of the last week have made it where only a clowns crew would continue with this "go for it in 2018" malarkey. That's why I expect the O's to sell nobody, and go for it in 2018.

I'm afraid this is the likely direction.   Last offseason would have been the time to sell on Machado and Britton.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Eric Longenhagen's chat today on Ethan mentions a flaw that EL regards as so damaging as to reduce him to mid 1st round. 12:45 Refugee: Appreciate your insight on Over-Slot recently. Do you consider Ethan Holliday’s swing flaw being identified this early something that works for (he’s not even 18 yet) or against him? 12:45 Eric A Longenhagen: Fugee is talking about this podcast appearance: Ep. 125: Jim Callis and Eric Longenhagen join the show. A Draft Lottery Preview. | Patreon 12:47 Eric A Longenhagen: I’m not sure it’s correctable, I think his hands just work in a way that leaves him very vulnerable to many fastballs up/away. I have him more middle of the first round. 72% contact guy on the showcase circuit, hit .240 and slugged .380 when you add up his entire multi-year showcase sample. Love the raw power potential, don’t think the performance merits a top 5 pick. But the Colorado/Holliday connection and Washington’s willingness to take guys like Elijah Green looms.    
    • I'm fine with Castillo but I would like another piece too whether it's Buhler, Manea or another trade like Montgomery who won't cost any big prospects one would think. I sure hope they won't be satisfied with just Castillo as he isn't as good as Burnes. If Baltimore is losing a TOR and not replacing him with a TOR then make the rotation as deep as possible so we don't see another situation like last season. 
    • Exactly   Let it play out and judge the postseason when it is complete.   Being made at Elias for something you think he might fail to do is... kind of silly.
    • It will be interesting to watch all the outfield results from Santander/Teoscar down to Hays. Whether you like the play or not, locking down a Boras client to be a market setter rather than a follower was an aggressive move. 50 for O'Neill looks better if Santander actually commands the 5 years reports are tonight he's seeking.    Maybe the market is so healthy Dombrowski miscalculated and the gift of early free agency is a windfall for Hays.
    • I'm not expert on that.  So I remain open to hearing anyone's disputes regarding my projections, but I did my best to project a fair, median ground for the collective. It would be nice if Frobby was here to check my work.
    • Any flexibility for AR and TON leaving, would almost certainly be eaten up by the increases in the other guys' Arb salaries.  And you're also walking into Gunnar's last season of control, so has he been extended?  Or do you trade him? I'm not saying you can't sign Burnes.  But I am saying if you want to keep payroll under 200 mil, and still be a competitive team, he better be pitching at a high level for the salary he's projected to be making.
    • Good post. We might be able to add one or two elite guys but there isn't much margin for error if they turn into a bad contract. You have to believe that next year is "the year" and Burnes is the guy to deliver the title.  After '27 you would have Rutschman and O'Neil expiring along with potentially Castillo if we got him instead of Burnes. So there would be some flexibility to retool in '28, but we would need to replace those guys with new talent. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...