Jump to content

Good guy Cole Hamels


waroriole

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 hours ago, MDtransplant757 said:

Honestly, I'd try to get him from the Rangers. They have 4 LHP's. Hamels is a FA and has an option for 2019. If you take most of the salary, you'll probably have him

It's a team option, not a player option. If the Rangers don't want him back for 2019, they'll just decline it. Granted, it's a $6 million buyout, but that's not a crippling amount.

The Rangers aren't going to dump Hamels just to get rid of his salary, especially when he's still a pretty good pitcher.

Posted
5 hours ago, PaulFolk said:

It's a team option, not a player option. If the Rangers don't want him back for 2019, they'll just decline it. Granted, it's a $6 million buyout, but that's not a crippling amount.

The Rangers aren't going to dump Hamels just to get rid of his salary, especially when he's still a pretty good pitcher.

He's still a great pitcher, however the Rangers having 4 LHP's and Hamels being owed quite a chunk of change, that there is a possibility that he could be traded somewhere for a nice package. The Rangers need OFers, we have OF depth in the minors. We also have a 1B option for them in Trumbo as a potential swap too in said package. DD is going to have to get very creative this year if we want to be competitive 

Posted
7 hours ago, MDtransplant757 said:

He's still a great pitcher, however the Rangers having 4 LHP's and Hamels being owed quite a chunk of change, that there is a possibility that he could be traded somewhere for a nice package. The Rangers need OFers, we have OF depth in the minors. We also have a 1B option for them in Trumbo as a potential swap too in said package. DD is going to have to get very creative this year if we want to be competitive 

You have gone from saying that " If you take most of the salary, you'll probably have him" to  "he could be traded somewhere for a nice package."

The Rangers traded Yu Darvish last year, so Hamels is the closest thing they have to an ace.  The Rangers have obtained three starting pitchers already this off season so they are trying to win in 2018 and it would make very little sense to trade their best starting pitcher.  Also it was announced yesterday that Martin Perez is going to miss the first part of the season.  Perhaps if the Rangers are out of it in mid-season they would look to trade Hamels but certainly not this off season.

I would recommend to try to understand what both teams are looking to accomplish before proposing a trade.  Joey Gallo is a similar player to Trumbo only younger, cheaper  and with more power.  They also acquired Willie Calhoun in the Darvish trade.  He is a very good major league ready hitter who does not really have a position and will likely DH. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Eric Longenhagen's chat today on Ethan mentions a flaw that EL regards as so damaging as to reduce him to mid 1st round. 12:45 Refugee: Appreciate your insight on Over-Slot recently. Do you consider Ethan Holliday’s swing flaw being identified this early something that works for (he’s not even 18 yet) or against him? 12:45 Eric A Longenhagen: Fugee is talking about this podcast appearance: Ep. 125: Jim Callis and Eric Longenhagen join the show. A Draft Lottery Preview. | Patreon 12:47 Eric A Longenhagen: I’m not sure it’s correctable, I think his hands just work in a way that leaves him very vulnerable to many fastballs up/away. I have him more middle of the first round. 72% contact guy on the showcase circuit, hit .240 and slugged .380 when you add up his entire multi-year showcase sample. Love the raw power potential, don’t think the performance merits a top 5 pick. But the Colorado/Holliday connection and Washington’s willingness to take guys like Elijah Green looms.    
    • I'm fine with Castillo but I would like another piece too whether it's Buhler, Manea or another trade like Montgomery who won't cost any big prospects one would think. I sure hope they won't be satisfied with just Castillo as he isn't as good as Burnes. If Baltimore is losing a TOR and not replacing him with a TOR then make the rotation as deep as possible so we don't see another situation like last season. 
    • Exactly   Let it play out and judge the postseason when it is complete.   Being made at Elias for something you think he might fail to do is... kind of silly.
    • It will be interesting to watch all the outfield results from Santander/Teoscar down to Hays. Whether you like the play or not, locking down a Boras client to be a market setter rather than a follower was an aggressive move. 50 for O'Neill looks better if Santander actually commands the 5 years reports are tonight he's seeking.    Maybe the market is so healthy Dombrowski miscalculated and the gift of early free agency is a windfall for Hays.
    • I'm not expert on that.  So I remain open to hearing anyone's disputes regarding my projections, but I did my best to project a fair, median ground for the collective. It would be nice if Frobby was here to check my work.
    • Any flexibility for AR and TON leaving, would almost certainly be eaten up by the increases in the other guys' Arb salaries.  And you're also walking into Gunnar's last season of control, so has he been extended?  Or do you trade him? I'm not saying you can't sign Burnes.  But I am saying if you want to keep payroll under 200 mil, and still be a competitive team, he better be pitching at a high level for the salary he's projected to be making.
    • Good post. We might be able to add one or two elite guys but there isn't much margin for error if they turn into a bad contract. You have to believe that next year is "the year" and Burnes is the guy to deliver the title.  After '27 you would have Rutschman and O'Neil expiring along with potentially Castillo if we got him instead of Burnes. So there would be some flexibility to retool in '28, but we would need to replace those guys with new talent. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...