Jump to content

Norfolk roster: How is Dan doing?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Posted

A lot of promotions from the playoff team a Bowie;

1B - Aderlin Rodriguez

2B - Sardinas

SS - Tejada (if not in the majors)

3B - Dosch

C - Wynn or Sisco

LF - Stewart

CF - Rickard

RF- Rosa

DH- 

UIF - 

OF -

OF -

Note: Wilkerson suspended; Mullins begins season at AA

SP1 - Hess

SP2 - Ramirez

SP3 - Means

SP4 - Lee

SP5 - Aquino

SP6 - Kelly

RP1 - Scott

RP 2- Yacabonis

RP3 - Long

RP4 - Wright (outrighted the day before opening day)

RP5 - Asher

RP6 - Wotherspoon

RP7 - Faulkner

RP8 - Joely Rodriguez

RP9 - Meisinger

RP10 - Crichton

 

 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, ChuckS said:

Good chance Hays and Mullins start in Norfolk and Rickard is a fourth or fifth outfielder in Baltimore.

 

 

Rickard probably does not start in the majors this year.  He didn't hit well last year and he is a right-handed hitter.    Jones, Mancini, Hays are all right-handed,   Santander has a spot for the first 44 days.   The O's will probably add a lefty.

Posted
22 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Rickard probably does not start in the majors this year.  He did hit well last year and he is a right-handed hitter.    Jones, Mancini, Hays are all right-handed,   Santander has a spot for the first 44 days.   The O's will probably add a lefty.

They already have.

Posted

Rotation and bullpen could be the best Norfolks had in many years. Lineup definitely missing the sluggers it had last season. Sardinas might be the utility for Orioles. 

Posted
5 hours ago, wildcard said:

Rickard probably does not start in the majors this year.  He didn't hit well last year and he is a right-handed hitter.    Jones, Mancini, Hays are all right-handed,   Santander has a spot for the first 44 days.   The O's will probably add a lefty.

Hays will be a better major league hitter than Rickard in 2018, but the question is what's best for his development.     When the O's decide he's ready, he's obviously taking precedence over Rickard.    But the O's may decide the best way to develop Hays is to give him 100-200 PA in AAA and see how he performs.   To me, Rickard is irrelevant to that decision, though he may be affected by it.

Posted

Little Yaz might be back for the outfield, Adrian Marin and/or Eric Salcedo might jump up to Norfolk at second or short.

Chris Johnson might come back too, as his father is the Norfolk manager and he had a good sesson, despite losing a lot of time due to a broken forearm early on.

Posted
On 12/28/2017 at 4:44 PM, Frobby said:

Hays will be a better major league hitter than Rickard in 2018, but the question is what's best for his development.     When the O's decide he's ready, he's obviously taking precedence over Rickard.    But the O's may decide the best way to develop Hays is to give him 100-200 PA in AAA and see how he performs.   To me, Rickard is irrelevant to that decision, though he may be affected by it.

As I think through what happens in ST I see Hays showing the ability to defend in right field.  I see him with a plus arm.   I see his speed and hustle.   Than I see him hitting against minor leaguers most of the time or major league pitchers that are working on their stuff or not in mid season form.   He should hit well in that environment.  

If he does.  He probably begins the year in the majors.   Mancini earned a spot last year.  I think its probably too hard for O's management to send him down with the talent he will show.

Posted
9 hours ago, wildcard said:

As I think through what happens in ST I see Hays showing the ability to defend in right field.  I see him with a plus arm.   I see his speed and hustle.   Than I see him hitting against minor leaguers most of the time or major league pitchers that are working on their stuff or not in mid season form.   He should hit well in that environment.  

If he does.  He probably begins the year in the majors.   Mancini earned a spot last year.  I think its probably too hard for O's management to send him down with the talent he will show.

Low A: Mancini 291 PA, Hays 0

Hi A: Mancini 512 PA, Hays 280

AA: Mancini 429 PA, Hays 283

AAA: Mancini 536 PA, Hays 0

Now I’m not complaining that Hays has been brought along quickly so far.    His performance at Frederick proved he deserved to skip Delmarva, and his performance at Bowie proved he deserved the mid season promotion he got.      But I’m saying that Mancini was a fully baked product when he was competing for a major league job last spring, and Hays is being asked to make a much bigger leap.   For me, the goal isn’t to have him in the major leagues as soon as possible; the goal is to have him be a good major league player as soon as possible.    And to do that, he may need to have some time in AAA, as Mancini did.   Being 1% better than Joey Rickard shouldn’t be the test here.

Posted
13 hours ago, Frobby said:

Low A: Mancini 291 PA, Hays 0

Hi A: Mancini 512 PA, Hays 280

AA: Mancini 429 PA, Hays 283

AAA: Mancini 536 PA, Hays 0

Now I’m not complaining that Hays has been brought along quickly so far.    His performance at Frederick proved he deserved to skip Delmarva, and his performance at Bowie proved he deserved the mid season promotion he got.      But I’m saying that Mancini was a fully baked product when he was competing for a major league job last spring, and Hays is being asked to make a much bigger leap.   For me, the goal isn’t to have him in the major leagues as soon as possible; the goal is to have him be a good major league player as soon as possible.    And to do that, he may need to have some time in AAA, as Mancini did.   Being 1% better than Joey Rickard shouldn’t be the test here.

What if he look ready in ST?   Do you think the O's can resist keeping him?

There is a big difference between Mancini and Hays.  Mancini was blocked and had to learn a new position to make the team.   Hays  has little competition in right field

Posted
9 minutes ago, wildcard said:

What if he look ready in ST?   Do you think the O's can resist keeping him?

There is a big difference between Mancini and Hays.  Mancini was blocked and had to learn a new position to make the team.   Hays  has little competition in right field

I have an open mind about Hays proving he’s ready.    But we need to make him prove it.     The last two weeks of spring training, when most of the AA guys are gone and the major leaguers are rounding into form, will be the part I care about.   

Posted
3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I have an open mind about Hays proving he’s ready.    But we need to make him prove it.     The last two weeks of spring training, when most of the AA guys are gone and the major leaguers are rounding into form, will be the part I care about.   

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • The Locked on Orioles podcast was suggesting that there had to be multiple pieces added to the deal for Castillo. Something like Mountcastle, Kjerstad, McDermott, Fabian. I don't know, seems a lot more than I would be willing to trade for Castillo
    • By some defensive metrics, Ryan Mountcastle and 2024 Gold Glove winner Carlos Santana are similar:  https://www.fieldingbible.com/drs-leaderboard/players?position=3 FWIW Luis Castillo's value at Baseball Trade Values has jumped from a negative $30.6 million on November 8, to a negative $6.1 million on November 22, to a positive $5.5 million on December 2 to a positive $2.8 million Monday to a positive $7.7 million Friday evening. The Mariners will continue to monitor Castillo's trade value as the pitching market evolves this offseason. Trade offers should determine Castillo's trade value although his no-trade clause complicates matters.
    • Context matters.  Really I should have made a much longer post incorporating the following image.   The O's are roughly 20th in revenue.  (TBH, I have some questions about that.  I think it might be lower) They're currently 19th in payroll.  Is it really fair to say they're underspending?  (Mind you this chart is a few years older.) There are a lot of people claiming they can spend 200 a year on salary.  Maybe.  But it's fair to say team's with similar revenues don't do that.
    • This is true, but the problem remains if you sign some guy to a 7 year contract, while that money might be palatable in 2026, it could quickly grow not so in the upcoming years.  Obviously, if you could sign Burnes for 1/2 years you'd do it; but that isn't really an option.
    • What happened in the 2nd half w Adley is puzzling. I would say however that 17 mill in 2027 should be more like 10% of the payroll, so far more palatable than 20%.
    • You have to look at payroll in context though thinking 3 years in advance compared to what league average will be with revenue increasing.  This is league average payroll.   2019 112 million 2020 58 million but was Covid year. 2021 120 million 2022 134 million 2023  150 million 2024 156 million So league average is up 36 million 4 years.  If it keeps around that pace league average should be over 180 million so that 100 million would be little over half of league average payroll.  
    • This is drastically underestimating Paredes
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...