Unless I'm missing something we lost Tony's #60 and #72 ranked prospects and about 4-5 guys who didn't make the top 72. Nunez probably comes back. It's not even clear what his health status is.
I'm probably one of the biggest detractors of the draft pick but he kind of addressed the issue his sophomore year. He cut his strikeout rate from over 29% to right around 20%. He didn't produce as well and seemingly gave up on those adjustments in order to have a big junior year.
The hope, I would think, is that he'll be able to make the adjustments for more contact and eventually combine that with good production. The fact that he struggled so badly last summer might be a good thing in the long run. He should be more willing to make the adjustments and stick with them this time.
-The financial structure of MLB isn’t going to change because of the Orioles. MLBs business model is based on large markets driving revenue and that is never going to change. The committee tasked with competitive balance is CHAIRED by the LAD’s owner-what does that tell you?
-Revenue is growing much faster than planned in the CBA (10% v 3%) Big markets are flush with cash the tax penalties have much less effect.
-The Orioles received and continue to receive welfare-substantial revenue sharing and draft picks as a smaller market team.
-KC similar market/revenue are able to sign multiple 2/3s, extend Witt under favorable terms and trade for a #1.
-I would suggest the problem lies as much with the Orioles as it does with MLB
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.