Jump to content

Nice interview with Richard Bleier


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Posted

Really nice to listen to a guy that is sooo happy to be in the majors with the O's.    He says start me, relieve me.  for an inning or long man,  I really don't care. I will pitch every day if you want.   Just keep me here.   He has had good results.    Doesn't go for strikeouts.   Accepts that he is a ground ball pitcher.  Credits coming up with a cutter for making him a better pitcher.

http://www.wbal.com/article/286991/6/brett-chats-with-orioles-lhp-richard-bleier-from-mini-camp-in-florida

 

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

Can anyone explain why he isn't being talked about as a rotation candidate? 

He's 30 years old and despite a solid ERA in 60+ innings last year he had a 3.69 K/9. Most pitchers see their strikeout rates drop when they start vs relieve. Although his is so low, that may not even be an option. I'm not sure it can get any lower than that.

Here are all of the qualified starter campaigns in the last decade with strikeout rates at or lower than Bleiers' 2017:

Brad Penny 2011 5.30 ERA 181 innings 3.67 K/9

Livan Hernandez 2008 6.05 ERA 180 innings 3.35 K/9

Aaron Cook 2007 4.12 ERA 166 innings 3.31 K/9

Strikeouts matter, whether pitchers are "strikeout pitchers" or not. They have to get some, or they won't be successful for very long in this era.

Posted
26 minutes ago, Babypowder said:

He's 30 years old and despite a solid ERA in 60+ innings last year he had a 3.69 K/9. Most pitchers see their strikeout rates drop when they start vs relieve. Although his is so low, that may not even be an option. I'm not sure it can get any lower than that.

Here are all of the qualified starter campaigns in the last decade with strikeout rates at or lower than Bleiers' 2017:

Brad Penny 2011 5.30 ERA 181 innings 3.67 K/9

Livan Hernandez 2008 6.05 ERA 180 innings 3.35 K/9

Aaron Cook 2007 4.12 ERA 166 innings 3.31 K/9

Strikeouts matter, whether pitchers are "strikeout pitchers" or not. They have to get some, or they won't be successful for very long in this era.

Did you listen to the interview.   He is not even trying to strike out batters.  He is concentrating on getting ground balls.

Posted
1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Did you listen to the interview.   He is not even trying to strike out batters.  He is concentrating on getting ground balls.

Yes, and so were/are a host of other pitchers in MLB in the last decade. If you don't get some strikeouts, even if that isn't your goal, you don't succeed.

Maybe Bleier is a unicorn. I don't like planning for unicorns.

Posted

it appears too me that Dan is seeing  control pitchers as the current value commodity available on the market.   Dan is always trying to stay ahead of the market in finding value.

When everyone was going nuts over OBP Dan and Buck were saying that homers play in their park.   Now homers are a big deal.

Dan, since he joined the O's, has waited out the off season market looking to sign undervalued players.  This year many GMs are doing it.

Dan now seems to see value in control and ground ball pitchers just as strikeout pitchers are all the rage. 

Posted
29 minutes ago, Babypowder said:

He's 30 years old and despite a solid ERA in 60+ innings last year he had a 3.69 K/9. Most pitchers see their strikeout rates drop when they start vs relieve. Although his is so low, that may not even be an option. I'm not sure it can get any lower than that.

Here are all of the qualified starter campaigns in the last decade with strikeout rates at or lower than Bleiers' 2017:

Brad Penny 2011 5.30 ERA 181 innings 3.67 K/9

Livan Hernandez 2008 6.05 ERA 180 innings 3.35 K/9

Aaron Cook 2007 4.12 ERA 166 innings 3.31 K/9

Strikeouts matter, whether pitchers are "strikeout pitchers" or not. They have to get some, or they won't be successful for very long in this era.

On the positive side, he throws strikes and likely to be less bad than Miley, Tyler Wilson, Mike Wright, Helickson etc. He can't be in the mix with Ynoa, Castro, etc?

I'm not saying he should be written into the rotation, but I think he earned a look. Maybe he bombs but it's not worth an experiment?

Posted
5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

it appears too me that Dan is seeing  control pitchers as the current value commodity available on the market.   Dan is always trying to stay ahead of the market in finding value.

He just learned is lesson from Miley and Ubaldo hahaha.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Babypowder said:

Yes, and so were/are a host of other pitchers in MLB in the last decade. If you don't get some strikeouts, even if that isn't your goal, you don't succeed.

Maybe Bleier is a unicorn. I don't like planning for unicorns.

Dan, Buck and Richard may not agree with your opinion.

Posted
1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Dan, Buck and Richard may not agree with your opinion.

Like I said, maybe he's a unicorn. A lot of data suggests that is extremely unlikely.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

He just learned is lesson from Miley and Ubaldo hahaha.

Ubaldo maybe.  Miley was a mid season trade.   Certainly neither worked out as planned with the O's.

Posted
Just now, Babypowder said:

Like I said, maybe he's a unicorn. A lot of data suggests that is extremely unlikely.

That is how Dan sometimes finds value.  He goes against the current thinking.at times.

Posted
39 minutes ago, interloper said:

I like Bleier in his current role. He would get murdered trying to start.

I think this is likely as well.   Leave him where he has been successful, and hope it continues.    

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Eric Longenhagen's chat today on Ethan mentions a flaw that EL regards as so damaging as to reduce him to mid 1st round. 12:45 Refugee: Appreciate your insight on Over-Slot recently. Do you consider Ethan Holliday’s swing flaw being identified this early something that works for (he’s not even 18 yet) or against him? 12:45 Eric A Longenhagen: Fugee is talking about this podcast appearance: Ep. 125: Jim Callis and Eric Longenhagen join the show. A Draft Lottery Preview. | Patreon 12:47 Eric A Longenhagen: I’m not sure it’s correctable, I think his hands just work in a way that leaves him very vulnerable to many fastballs up/away. I have him more middle of the first round. 72% contact guy on the showcase circuit, hit .240 and slugged .380 when you add up his entire multi-year showcase sample. Love the raw power potential, don’t think the performance merits a top 5 pick. But the Colorado/Holliday connection and Washington’s willingness to take guys like Elijah Green looms.    
    • I'm fine with Castillo but I would like another piece too whether it's Buhler, Manea or another trade like Montgomery who won't cost any big prospects one would think. I sure hope they won't be satisfied with just Castillo as he isn't as good as Burnes. If Baltimore is losing a TOR and not replacing him with a TOR then make the rotation as deep as possible so we don't see another situation like last season. 
    • Exactly   Let it play out and judge the postseason when it is complete.   Being made at Elias for something you think he might fail to do is... kind of silly.
    • It will be interesting to watch all the outfield results from Santander/Teoscar down to Hays. Whether you like the play or not, locking down a Boras client to be a market setter rather than a follower was an aggressive move. 50 for O'Neill looks better if Santander actually commands the 5 years reports are tonight he's seeking.    Maybe the market is so healthy Dombrowski miscalculated and the gift of early free agency is a windfall for Hays.
    • I'm not expert on that.  So I remain open to hearing anyone's disputes regarding my projections, but I did my best to project a fair, median ground for the collective. It would be nice if Frobby was here to check my work.
    • Any flexibility for AR and TON leaving, would almost certainly be eaten up by the increases in the other guys' Arb salaries.  And you're also walking into Gunnar's last season of control, so has he been extended?  Or do you trade him? I'm not saying you can't sign Burnes.  But I am saying if you want to keep payroll under 200 mil, and still be a competitive team, he better be pitching at a high level for the salary he's projected to be making.
    • Good post. We might be able to add one or two elite guys but there isn't much margin for error if they turn into a bad contract. You have to believe that next year is "the year" and Burnes is the guy to deliver the title.  After '27 you would have Rutschman and O'Neil expiring along with potentially Castillo if we got him instead of Burnes. So there would be some flexibility to retool in '28, but we would need to replace those guys with new talent. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...