Jump to content

Are some stats totally meaningless?


NewMarketSean

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Stats like AVG and RBI?

Just wondering what people think about some stats that don't matter any more, or never really did.

Discuss.

I once created a stat as a kid called "RBI per HR" that I used in my video game playing. It was simply RBI divided by HR. For some reason I felt that this was a very interesting way to measure how productive a power hitter was. This was an utterly useless stat. I'm not sure that AVG is much better. Scratch that, both RBI per HR and AVG are extremely useful... in providing division practice to 7-year-olds.

-m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But really, there are no useless stats. Even AVG can tell you *something*. The problem lies in that it is valued too highly and often in exclusion of every other stat. AVG had its heyday when I was a kid, but it appears to be losing its reign as king of stats... probably because the baseball card market is in such a shambles.

-m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But really, there are no useless stats. Even AVG can tell you *something*. The problem lies in that it is valued too highly and often in exclusion of every other stat. AVG had its heyday when I was a kid, but it appears to be losing its reign as king of stats... probably because the baseball card market is in such a shambles.

-m

Exactly what I was going to say. There are no useless stats, just useless uses of stats. With any stat you have to ask yourself "what does this really tell me, and how important is what it tells me?"

Certainly many stats mentioned tell us less than others, and some are overrated because they are comfortable and everyone for generations have understood them. But don't hate the stats... hate the users.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A K-State stats guy did his thesis on ID'ing MiL predictors of ML hitting success... he found 4 of them.

Three of them were equations with multiple factors.

The only one that was just a straight simple stat was AVG.

Not OBP or SLG or OPS, but AVG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A K-State stats guy did his thesis on ID'ing MiL predictors of ML hitting success... he found 4 of them.

Three of them were equations with multiple factors.

The only one that was just a straight simple stat was AVG.

Not OBP or SLG or OPS, but AVG.

To an old school baseball in its pure form proponent like myself, AVG is the single most important stat of all as far as an individual player. It is what they give a Batting Title for and it is the magic 400 target that is the toughest goal that is possible to achieve in sports. How any true baseball fan can say it isn't important is beyond belief?:confused::eek::(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not just "meaningful" but traditionally the essence of the individual player' offensive success. I see nothing in the sport to change that either.

It represents a large portion of a player's offensive ability but not all of it.

Taking walks... having a good eye... is a skill whether you like it or not. If it this wasn't the case, then everyone wouldn't walk at all. Average neglects this.

Average also doesn't factor in how many bases a player is able to touch with each hit too. Is a player who hits 50 singles better than a player who hits 15 singles and 20 doubles?

Average may not be useless but it should never be used as the main tool to gauge how good a player is IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A K-State stats guy did his thesis on ID'ing MiL predictors of ML hitting success... he found 4 of them.

Three of them were equations with multiple factors.

The only one that was just a straight simple stat was AVG.

Not OBP or SLG or OPS, but AVG.

Sure, for minor leagues being able to hit the ball is very important. For all the people who say that batting average and strikeouts aren't important, thats usually just talking about major leaguers.

For minor a leaguer to have low average and high K's is a very bad sign, because those problems usually just get worse as a guy climbs the ladder.

Once they are at the majors though, it doesn't really matter if they have a low average and high K's, as long as they overcome for those weaknesses. Adam Dunn's a great example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Average may not be useless but it should never be used as the main tool to gauge how good a player is IMO.
I don't think anybody other than OldFan is suggesting it should be. And that alone should tell you something.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Average may not be useless but it should never be used as the main tool to gauge how good a player is IMO.

There is no ONE stat that should be used in such a light.

Stats are meant to be examined and analyzed as a whole.

Why do you think there are so many of them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Works for me,  as long as the first piece is a Norby type!  Only one of Ortiz/Westburg/Cowser/Kjerstad should be traded for Cease.  Let them pick one of them and a couple in the 8-15 range then a lottery pick or two if needed.  But giving up 2 of those is to pricy for the return.  I like Cease, but personally value him as a very solid #3 starter.  Sure, he COULD perform better than that,  but I wouldn't bet on it.  Maybe he reverts back to his 2022 form, but I think it more likely that what we get is what we saw from him in 2023, with an improvement in numbers due to the defense behind him. 
    • Exited about this kid and the future of our international signings. We have to remember the initial reporting don’t mean a whole lot. We’ve had success in the 100-500 k range too.
    • Downtown restaurants should like this too.  Much better for any local entertainment venues.
    • Cease is a solid MLB starting pitcher with 2 years of control  who's team has clearly made it known that he's available.  Of course there is a lot of interest.  There is a lot of interest in the Orioles' prospects, as well.  Fans of both teams are hopeful that their team will get maximum value for their assets in any trade.  I'm sure that it is sometimes difficult for GMs to reach a meeting of the minds on a player's value, in which case they need to work out a restructure of the discussed deal that may not include that player.  I think Elias' opinion on Ortiz is likely to be pretty close to what posters on this site are telling you.  If the White Sox GM views Ortiz as you do, it would seem that a deal between the two teams would most likely not have Ortiz included.  I'm sure that isn't all that unusual and the GMs just turn the page and look at working out a trade involving other players/prospects.  What confuses me is that you seem to rate Ortiz lower than we do and lower than the various sites rate him, but would like a trade of Cease for Cowser and Ortiz.  I'm against that deal because I think 2 prospects rated that highly would be an overpay.  It seems to me, you agree.  You simply rate Ortiz lower.  Seems to me that the answer in such an impasse that would make both parties happy would be to replace Ortiz with another prospect that is lower rated than Ortiz -- which would be of equal value in your mind, since you rate Ortiz lower and still think the proposed trade is a fair one.  Make sense?  Maybe replace Ortiz with Norby.
    • I would definitely do Westburg  and Cowser.
    • 100% agree with you.  Especially when you haves waves of prospects coming up behind these guys.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...