Jump to content

Should the O's Focus on "Retooling" for 2019?


mdbdotcom

Recommended Posts

Posted

Considering how much better the Yankees, Angels and Twins have gotten, the O's have a long way to go to contend in 2018. Would it make more sense to focus on building the 2019 team?

Here are some of the players who will already have jobs or be competing for one when we get to spring training in 2019. I have only included players who will be under 30 years old or still under contract.

Rotation

  • Gausman
  • Bundy
  • Harvey

Bullpen

  • Givens
  • Scott
  • Yacabonis
  • Cortes
  • Castro
  • O'Day

Catcher

  • Sisco
  • Wynns

Infield

  • Davis
  • Schoop
  • Beckham

Outfield

  • Hays
  • Mullins
  • Stewart
  • Mancini
  • Rickard

DH

  • Trumbo
  • Santander
  • Mountcastle

Who have I left out? Obviously, we need a 3B and some pitching, but  is this a team worth building around? Is the glimmer of the next core in there? Or, should we just blow it all up and set our sites a few more years down the road?

Posted

Yes and Akin could be in line for back of rotation or bullpen spot.

 

edit: Actually 2020 is probably a better target year to build for, since we should have much more pitching talent close to being ready.

Posted
2 minutes ago, bpilktree67 said:

How have the Twins got better.  I keep seeing that but they have not added anything yet and also have a big cloud over their head with the Sano issue.

The want to sign a TOR starter. And may get one.

Posted
4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

The want to sign a TOR starter. And may get one.

We want to sign someone I am sure and we may get a couple guys.  The Twins only added Reed so far but have to be concerned if they will lose Sano for a decent chunk of games.

Posted
1 minute ago, bpilktree67 said:

We want to sign someone I am sure and we may get a couple guys.  The Twins only added Reed so far but have to be concerned if they will lose Sano for a decent chunk of games.

Sano may never play again.

Posted
46 minutes ago, bpilktree67 said:

How have the Twins got better.  I keep seeing that but they have not added anything yet and also have a big cloud over their head with the Sano issue.

They've gotten better since we last went to the playoffs, not necessarily this season. And by playing in a division where three teams are rebuilding, they get to pile up wins thanks to the uneven schedule.

Posted
6 hours ago, mdbdotcom said:

Considering how much better the Yankees, Angels and Twins have gotten, the O's have a long way to go to contend in 2018. Would it make more sense to focus on building the 2019 team?

Here are some of the players who will already have jobs or be competing for one when we get to spring training in 2019. I have only included players who will be under 30 years old or still under contract.

Rotation

  • Gausman
  • Bundy
  • Harvey

Bullpen

  • Givens
  • Scott
  • Yacabonis
  • Cortes
  • Castro
  • O'Day

Catcher

  • Sisco
  • Wynns

Infield

  • Davis
  • Schoop
  • Beckham

Outfield

  • Hays
  • Mullins
  • Stewart
  • Mancini
  • Rickard

DH

  • Trumbo
  • Santander
  • Mountcastle

Who have I left out? Obviously, we need a 3B and some pitching, but  is this a team worth building around? Is the glimmer of the next core in there? Or, should we just blow it all up and set our sites a few more years down the road?

I'd blow it up. Angelos won't allow that though. IMO 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • This is true, but the problem remains if you sign some guy to a 7 year contract, while that money might be palatable in 2026, it could quickly grow not so in the upcoming years.  Obviously, if you could sign Burnes for 1/2 years you'd do it; but that isn't really an option.
    • What happened in the 2nd half w Adley is puzzling. I would say however that 17 mill in 2027 should be more like 10% of the payroll, so far more palatable than 20%.
    • You have to look at payroll in context though thinking 3 years in advance compared to what league average will be with revenue increasing.  This is league average payroll.   2019 112 million 2020 58 million but was Covid year. 2021 120 million 2022 134 million 2023  150 million 2024 156 million So league average is up 36 million 4 years.  If it keeps around that pace league average should be over 180 million so that 100 million would be little over half of league average payroll.  
    • This is drastically underestimating Paredes
    • they did not. 2 big moves so far, bring in Fried and Williams, but lose Holmes anf Cortez, Not to mention Soto. Oblivious there not yet but as it stands now they are not as good. and god forbid Stanton regresses or Judge gets hurt. 
    • I think if you're going to spike the payroll this is the year to do it, with so much potentially coming back off next year.
    • Elias spending the $25M early, Roster Resource has us at $122M tonight, 19th in MLB. If we close Burnes, we hit 13th for a minute.    Any AAV between 29 and 44 lands us between SFG at $167M and BOS at $150M. That'd just be a momentary crest - we land Burnes to make $65M in new 2025 salary and we're near done while most of the Top 50 free agents still have jobs to get. But to the OP point, that'd set us at ~$160 with all the studs the cheapest they'll ever be again in 2025.    We will get to reconfigure about $35M next winter when Eflin, Mullins and Sanchez walk, and of course there's the calculation/hope O'Neill plays well enough to opt out. I do think the O's financial analysts deserve a little credit for finding a contract balance where the CLUB is hoping the player opts out too.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...