Jump to content

June 14th vs Pirates


McNulty

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 358
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You can tell who leaves you rep, positive or negative.

So you gave her neg rep for not knowing what PR meant?

Well, I normally wouldn't post this type of thing here, but since she posted about it and several people responded, I'll just give my side. She sent me a PM about the rep and this was my response:

Hi Cindy,

Since you messaged me and posted in the thread about the reputation I left, I'm guessing you want an honest response, which I will give.

It was sort of shocked that someone with over 13,000 posts would not know what PR meant in the context of a sentence involving an injured runner on base in a close game, that sentence being in a post in a game thread. 'PR' is not just messageboard shorthand, it is the acronym used when keeping score, appearing in box scores in newspapers and on websites. So, my honest reaction, was shock.

Relatedly, I think that the game threads can get cluttered. Everyone should be allowed to post whatever they like, but I find it somewhat annoying when people, and not just you others also, ask questions that they could easily answer themselves with one or two clicks to MLB.com or ESPN.com.

Finally, one might say, "Well if you haven't anything nice to say, then don't say anything at all." While a fair enough sentiment in some circumstances, the negative reputation option exists for a reason. It makes no sense to have any sort of reputation or credit system if people are expected to censor themselves on the basis of supposed propriety or avoidance of appearing cruel.

Thus, I was not trying to be cruel nor doling out negative reputation for sport. No hard feelings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought everyone might like to know that cindy left me retaliatory negative rep. So, it wasn't for anything I posted, it's because I left some honest rep, she didn't like it, and an administrator told her who left it(unless there is some other way to know who left what).

Yea she neg repped me too b/c I made a sarcastic comment about the O's not being able to score w/ the bases loaded:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah I was thinking this might be good for both the team and Hays. Chance for him to press the reset button if nothing else. 
    • Actually, if you think about it, as long as there is a right handed pitcher with this lineup, once Westburg bats, there will always be 8 lefties in a row after that. 🤔
    • Sending Jackson down does nothing, there is nothing left to prove down there. He is taking good ABs, he is working counts, he looks fine in the field etc. I have used the Cowser comp, not to say he should be sent down, in the sense that Cowser looked particularly lost at times during his callup last year. Jackson is facing some professional adversity for the first time as a professional keep running him out there.    The fortunate thing is he isn't hurting the team in a significant way right now, and when it finally does click the Orioles will be just that much better. 
    • Actually move Westburg to 7th so there’s not so many lefties in a row. 
    • I’ll go with: Gunnar SS Adley C O’Hearn 1B Tony RF Westburg 3B Mullins CF Cowser LF Kjerstad DH Holliday 2B  
    • The question is, can he be productive playing just 1-2 times a week? We don't know because he's never really been in that role. Not everyone can stay productive in a part-time role. I think the Orioles will find a way to get him in the lineup 4-5 days a week. He can play corner outfield (except I would not play him in LF in Camden), DH and 1B. He still does not look great at 1B, but he can be serviceable if it means getting his bat into the lineup. That's a decent amount of ways to keep him and others fresh. Santander probably is at risk to sit a bit more than usual, but this also gives the Orioles an opportunity to have a very left-handed heavy lineup against righties at times, with Mountcastle sitting. The Orioles left-handed heavy lineup could be: 1. Henderson - SS 2. Rutschman - C 3. O'Hearn - 1B 4. Santander - RF 5. Cowser - LF 6. Mullins - CF 7. Westburg - 3B (R) 8. Kjerstad - DH 9. Holliday - 2B Imagine having to face that lineup and then have Mountcastle, McCann, Urias and Mateo for pinch running as a bench. Now don't get me wrong, Mountcastle is not going to be benched all that much, but Kjerstad could give Santander, Cowser, Mullins (with Cowser moving to CF), O'Hearn, Mountcastle, and Rutschman when he DHing a day off.  That's a lot of ways to keep him fresh and get his bat in the lineup.  
    • If so, probably just for 2 days or so.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...