Jump to content

Thoughts on Manny @ SS and Beckham @ 3B ??


alaniee

Recommended Posts

Posted

Since Buck at FanFest, confirmed that Manny will be playing SS and Beckham will be playing 3B, what are y'alls thoughts?

http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/22233464/baltimore-orioles-play-manny-machado-ss-move-tim-beckham-3b

Is it possible that this is the Orioles attempt to "up" Manny's trade value since SS's are generally considered more valuable than 3B?

Trying to make Manny "happy" by giving him SS since it's what he's wanted all along?

Thoughts?

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
1 minute ago, El Gordo said:

Well It will be fun watching Manny at SS anyway, even if we do suck

It will be interesting.   But I wonder if he'll make as many of the kind of breathtaking plays that he made at 3rd, the ones that made us smile in disbelief.

Posted

Whatever.  Shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic.

RE: trying to "up" his trade value, it's no secret that he can play SS.  I don't think there's anything Manny can do at SS that'd make him more valuable than he already is.

Posted

I think it will be interesting to watch how it works out.    I would have preferred to leave Beckham at short, but I have an open mind.

And I agree with Moose that it hardly matters if we don’t address the damned pitching.  

Posted
36 minutes ago, alaniee said:

Since Buck at FanFest, confirmed that Manny will be playing SS and Beckham will be playing 3B, what are y'alls thoughts?

http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/22233464/baltimore-orioles-play-manny-machado-ss-move-tim-beckham-3b

Is it possible that this is the Orioles attempt to "up" Manny's trade value since SS's are generally considered more valuable than 3B?

Trying to make Manny "happy" by giving him SS since it's what he's wanted all along?

Thoughts?

If the idea is to increase trade value, I doubt it works because he’ll be worth less at the deadline anyway.  I really have trouble seeing any benefit to this set up. I don’t know if it’s worth being mad about though. I think Buck just isn’t a fan of Beckham-type defenders (rangy but inconsistent) so he wants someone he trusts at SS.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

If the idea is to increase trade value, I doubt it works because he’ll be worth less at the deadline anyway.  I really have trouble seeing any benefit to this set up. I don’t know if it’s worth being mad about though. I think Buck just isn’t a fan of Beckham-type defenders (rangy but inconsistent) so he wants someone he trusts at SS.

The only benefit there might be a perceived increase in defense, especially double plays. Machado with the stronger arm *should* turn more.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

The only benefit there might be a perceived increase in defense, especially double plays. Machado with the stronger arm *should* turn more.

I'm going to miss some of those incredible 5-4-3s Manny & Jon used to turn.

I'm still in the early stages of grief in terms of never getting to watch Manny play 3rd again.

Posted
53 minutes ago, SteveA said:

It will be interesting.   But I wonder if he'll make as many of the kind of breathtaking plays that he made at 3rd, the ones that made us smile in disbelief.

He won't make those kind of plays, he'll make different ones. But still exciting IMO.

Posted

Maybe they are going to make an offer to him this off season and hope this move will encourage some kind of home town discount from Manny? 

I dunno, seems odd to pander to a player's request when everyone knows you should be getting ready to move on from them. Not giving into their wishes...

Posted
5 hours ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

The only benefit there might be a perceived increase in defense, especially double plays. Machado with the stronger arm *should* turn more.

It’s not a matter of having the stronger arm.    It’s a matter of having the quicker release, hitting the 2B in the chest every time or making the pivot better.    

Posted

My impression?  This is going to be a tough season to go through.

6 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Whatever.  Shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic.

RE: trying to "up" his trade value, it's no secret that he can play SS.  I don't think there's anything Manny can do at SS that'd make him more valuable than he already is.

Posted

Positives I see for us:

  • Manny plays his natural position, where he has always wanted to play
  • Manny touches the ball more
  • Beckham touches the ball less

Positive I see for Manny:

  • He is not an elite hitting 3B. His career OPS of .805 would have ranked 14th among qualifying 3B last season. He's tried bulking up and hitting more home runs. It worked out in 2016, but not last season. He is a great defensive 3B and an average offensive 3B.
  • That same .805 career OPS would have ranked 4th among all qualifying SS last season, just .03 behind Elvis Andrus. We might find out this year that Manny is an elite SS, offensively and defensively. That would increase the likelihood that he will be signed to play SS (where he wants to play) and improve his chances of one day making it into the HOF. 

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Positives I see for us:

  • Manny plays his natural position, where he has always wanted to play
  • Manny touches the ball more
  • Beckham touches the ball less

Positive I see for Manny:

  • He is not an elite hitting 3B. His career OPS of .805 would have ranked 14th among qualifying 3B last season. He's tried bulking up and hitting more home runs. It worked out in 2016, but not last season. He is a great defensive 3B and an average offensive 3B.
  • That same .805 career OPS would have ranked 4th among all qualifying SS last season, just .03 behind Elvis Andrus. We might find out this year that Manny is an elite SS, offensively and defensively. That would increase the likelihood that he will be signed to play SS (where he wants to play) and improve his chances of one day making it into the HOF. 

 

Ass - uming he plays ss well, would he balk at playing third again for the Yankees?  If so, and Yanks prefer Didi or Gleyber at ss, he MAY not go to the Yanks.  Is that a positive?  ;-)

Good summary nonetheless.  I like it when you're "positive"! 

Posted
7 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

 

RE: trying to "up" his trade value, it's no secret that he can play SS.  I don't think there's anything Manny can do at SS that'd make him more valuable than he already is.

 

Just naming him SS ups his trade value. Pre-Season. Without another game played there. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • By some defensive metrics, Ryan Mountcastle and 2024 Gold Glove winner Carlos Santana are similar:  https://www.fieldingbible.com/drs-leaderboard/players?position=3 FWIW Luis Castillo's value at Baseball Trade Values has jumped from a negative $30.6 million on November 8, to a negative $6.1 million on November 22, to a positive $5.5 million on December 2 to a positive $2.8 million Monday to a positive $7.7 million Friday evening. The Mariners will continue to monitor Castillo's trade value as the pitching market evolves this offseason. Trade offers should determine Castillo's trade value although his no-trade clause complicates matters.
    • Context matters.  Really I should have made a much longer post incorporating the following image.   The O's are roughly 20th in revenue.  (TBH, I have some questions about that.  I think it might be lower) They're currently 19th in payroll.  Is it really fair to say they're underspending?  (Mind you this chart is a few years older.) There are a lot of people claiming they can spend 200 a year on salary.  Maybe.  But it's fair to say team's with similar payrolls don't do that.
    • This is true, but the problem remains if you sign some guy to a 7 year contract, while that money might be palatable in 2026, it could quickly grow not so in the upcoming years.  Obviously, if you could sign Burnes for 1/2 years you'd do it; but that isn't really an option.
    • What happened in the 2nd half w Adley is puzzling. I would say however that 17 mill in 2027 should be more like 10% of the payroll, so far more palatable than 20%.
    • You have to look at payroll in context though thinking 3 years in advance compared to what league average will be with revenue increasing.  This is league average payroll.   2019 112 million 2020 58 million but was Covid year. 2021 120 million 2022 134 million 2023  150 million 2024 156 million So league average is up 36 million 4 years.  If it keeps around that pace league average should be over 180 million so that 100 million would be little over half of league average payroll.  
    • This is drastically underestimating Paredes
    • they did not. 2 big moves so far, bring in Fried and Williams, but lose Holmes anf Cortez, Not to mention Soto. Oblivious there not yet but as it stands now they are not as good. and god forbid Stanton regresses or Judge gets hurt. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...