Jump to content

Cashner signing


jcaponio

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 757
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, foxfield said:

 

 

 

If the Orioles are broke they are being mismanaged.  See this article on the Orioles in Forbes in April of 2017:

https://www.forbes.com/teams/baltimore-orioles/ 

The Orioles had an operating loss in 16 and I presume they did in 17 as well.  The operating loss was $2.1 million on revenues of $253M.  Of course the value of the franchise rose 18% to 1.175 Billion.  While the article that is attached mentions the legal battle over MASN, it does not give a value to MASN nor does it stipulate if it is counted in the valuation though I presume it is.  

Broke is not where the Orioles are..cash poor and needing to get to a lower expense number?  Yeah, seems most of baseball is working on that and the Orioles should too.

But we should not be using terms that will mislead folks here.  The Orioles are not broke.  Unless you know something... If they are?  Wouldn't that increase the odds that my hunch that they are preparing for sale is on point?

 

1 hour ago, weams said:

My opinion is that they are not in good financial shape. And may be mismanaged. 

I'm not going to push...but I have to ask...so even assuming additional loses of say $10M in '17 added to the $2.1M in '16.  $12M+/- in loses for a say $1.5 Billion franchise is neither broke nor is it in "not good financial shape".  I concede that your knowledge of where the Orioles are for '17 and headed into '18 is certainly better than mine.  But......broke?  Poor financial shape?  WHY?

Attendance vs payroll do not account for much more than the number I use above.  Admittedly for financial numbers it is heavy on the back of the envelope.  But also what about the MLB payout....I just cant find anything to square your statement.  I trust you, so this concerns me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Diehard_O's_Fan said:

I agree with you wildcard. It is time for a FA pitcher signing to finally work out for the Orioles. The Orioles have definitely had some very bad luck when it comes to a FA pitcher signing. I hope Cashner is an Oriole for three years.

I hope he opts out after two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, foxfield said:

 

I'm not going to push...but I have to ask...so even assuming additional loses of say $10M in '17 added to the $2.1M in '16.  $12M+/- in loses for a say $1.5 Billion franchise is neither broke nor is it in "not good financial shape".  I concede that your knowledge of where the Orioles are for '17 and headed into '18 is certainly better than mine.  But......broke?  Poor financial shape?  WHY?

Attendance vs payroll do not account for much more than the number I use above.  Admittedly for financial numbers it is heavy on the back of the envelope.  But also what about the MLB payout....I just cant find anything to square your statement.  I trust you, so this concerns me.

I have no facts or data to really refute any positive spins. I think that the payroll is by nature a 120ish and they have spent so much more the last few years. They sell all of their international monies. They have traded comp pick to save money. They extended no one. I really think the Chris Davis thing was an attempt to win it all for Angelos the Elder. I think it was the Hail Mary.  2014 was really their year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weams said:

I have no facts or data to really refute any positive spins. I think that the payroll is by nature a 120ish and they have spent so much more the last few years. They sell all of their international monies. They have traded comp pick to save money. They extended no one. I really think the Chris Davis thing was an attempt to win it all for Angelos the Elder. I think it was the Hail Mary.  2014 was really their year. 

The MLB profit sharing and BAM money was what I think funded the Os since 2015. I would not be surprised if they were back on debt watch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weams said:

And don't trust me on this. I have NO insider information and I am sure the "Angelos is Midas" crowd will be sure to note his guilded toilets. Which I've never seen. 

I just smell an organization running a bit on fumes for a while. 

With a real old owner who won't do rebuild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, weams said:

I think he spent BAMtech the last two years. MASN is a farce. 

From what I have read the Orioles got 50 million in profit from MASN.   I don't really care how Peter Angelos spends his money.   But I don't think he is doing badly.   I think he donated 20 million to U of Baltimore law School to get family name on a building.   The Lounge for big donaters at symphony is named after Angelo's as well.   I am sure that requires a huge donation. I think he has loads of money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, weams said:

I think he spent BAMtech the last two years. MASN is a farce. 

I think BAMtech money was used last two years as well. Over the last few years, the O's have had a little over 2 million fans attend games - which puts them on Atlanta, Arizona, Seattle's level. I think $130-$140 million payroll is what the O's can realistically do.

As far as MASN - who knows what they actually bring in. I get the feeling it doesn't bring in as much money as people would expect. But, I could be totally wrong. All I know is that I hope it sticks around as long as it means I get to hear Gary Thorne call games while drinking Jack Daniels and Jim Palmer be his normal sassy self.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveA said:

Working hypothesis:

1) Angelos realized that the window had closed when the pitching went south last year.   Not only that, but attendance has dropped steadily and season tickets are way down for this year.   Season tickets correlate to total ticket sales, so even if the team miraculously had a great season, attendance would still likely drop.   Walkup helps but only on good weather days and can't make up for the loss of many 81 game plan holders.

2) So Angelos dialled back the budget this year.   This is a demarcation year.   Manny, Britton, Jones, Showalter, Duquette, Brach -- all gone after this year.   He knows in his wrinkled, dusty heart, that we can't win.

3) But DD was instructed to give lip service to winning so that the fans wouldn't completely abandon ship in droves.   A tourniquet to stop the bleeding this year.   Remember, there's thousands of fans who don't follow it as closely as we do.  They'll see we signed Cashner, we have some young guys, and they'll be hopeful.   We're an echo chamber in here, reinforcing each other's despair about the future of the franchise.   We are aware of advanced stats that 80% of people who go to games and spend money are not.   There are plenty of O's fans who watch 100+ games a year, go to 20+, but they don't follow baseball the way we do.   They don't study the FIPs of new acquisitions, or even think about baseball much at all until Opening Day.   Then they give it their full attention.   They've probably never heard of Cashner but they'll read the paper tomorrow and like his ERA from last year, and they'll form their opinion of him watching him pitch starting in April.   The doom and gloom in our niche segment of the fanbase hasn't quite gotten out to all Oriole fandom.   They know we had a bad year and had sucky pitching and the suckiest of the pitchers are gone, and they're waiting to see how the replacements do.   So just by talking about trying to compete, DD is preventing some folks from ditching their season tickets.

4) Next year we bring in fresh new GM, manager, start a youth movement highlighted by Harvey, Sisco, Hays, Akin, Stewart, Santander, Mullins... try to market it as a completely new era.   You won't be able to hide the fact that one era has ended with all those guys leaving, so you'll have to admit you are building.   Hope to get a 1989-style youth infusion and start growing the fanbase back.

Does that explain the inexplicable offseason?  

I agree completely.  Or Angelos is more infirm than the public is told and it is just do nothing by default.   Excellent post. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Forbes article said Orioles lost 2 million last year.  Team was bought for 173 million they estimate it is now worth 1.1 billion.   They say 15 percent debt.   If Angelo's needed money he could easily sell 10 percent of club or he could have team take out a loan for 100 million and pay himself a 100 million dollar dividend.   At his age I think 100 million could get him through the rest of his life even if he didn't stick to a budget. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...