Jump to content

Cashner signing


jcaponio

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Horsepower said:

I think this is a good start.  My pipe dream from here would be to sign Lynn and trade for McHugh (either Bach or Givens)

 

Lynn, Gausman, Bundy, McHugh, and Cashner..............I can support that

Would have to be Brach.   4 years of Givens> 2 years of McHugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 757
  • Created
  • Last Reply
11 hours ago, Frobby said:

There is no way we could have gone back to Ubaldo or Miley.    Even if Cashner does not turn out to do any better.   Hopefully, he’ll at least do significantly better than Ubaldo or Miley did last year.   If he does that, I really won’t care if Miley puts up better numbers in Milwaukee or Ubaldo wherever he is (if anywhere).

This is exactly right. The management knows that the fans would be in an uproar.

Still, there is an outside shot that the team could entertain bringing back Hellickson. Fans have not built up the same level of resentment against him.

And I think it is likely that Tillman -- who was worse than all of those three pitchers -- will sign with the Orioles. Personnel decisions often consider elements beyond statistics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not going to complain about the addition of Cashner, especially with the contract that we signed him to. I think he makes a nice innings eating #4 starter and I think his GB tendencies plays well in our ballpark.  It isn't over yet, maybe the Orioles can still find the #3 starter that they need. If so, they may have an outside shot at a wildcard, which is apparently the FO's dream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, theobird said:

I am not going to complain about the addition of Cashner, especially with the contract that we signed him to. I think he makes a nice innings eating #4 starter and I think his GB tendencies plays well in our ballpark.  It isn't over yet, maybe the Orioles can still find the #3 starter that they need. If so, they may have an outside shot at a wildcard, which is apparently the FO's dream.

The nice thing about the wildcard slot.

Once you get into the playoffs, the w-l records are all reset, and wildcard can and do win the WS Trophy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

Would have to be Brach.   4 years of Givens> 2 years of McHugh.

The Orioles could arcanely argue to the Astros that McHugh's best service to them in 2018 is helping the Orioles win a couple extra games against the Yankees and maybe Red Sox in the race for playoffs HFA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cimota said:

You would have hated Scott Mcgregor.  Never struck out 5 guys per nine innings in a season in his career. 

I probably saw 100 Scott McGregor starts either in person or on TV.  I grew up with Scott McGregor in the rotation.  I used to play catch in the back yard doing a windup where I looped my hands over my knee like Scott McGregor and then threw across my body.  That may be part of the reason my should hurts right now...

But Scott McGregor was from a different era, the 1980s strikeout minima, where Ks/9 fell below 5.0 for the first time since the 1950s.  He was backed by a very good defense and a solid offense, and he was very good.  But as soon as the game started to change a little, power went up, Ks went up... he was basically done as an effective pitcher at 30.  1987 looks more like today than any other year in his career, and even though he was just 33 he had a 6.64 ERA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

The Orioles could arcanely argue to the Astros that McHugh's best service to them in 2018 is helping the Orioles win a couple extra games against the Yankees and maybe Red Sox in the race for playoffs HFA.

I can see that argument, but I hope the Orioles look more at the big picture.   I'd rather throw money at another "innings-eater" than trade Givens at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

I can see that argument, but I hope the Orioles look more at the big picture.   I'd rather throw money at another "innings-eater" than trade Givens at this point.

Givens is the only legitimate 7-8-9 inning arm left after this season.  Britton and Brach are hitting FA, and O'Day is as well and he's borderline for that kind of role right now.  They can't give him up without getting a much better piece in return than McHugh, who is just spare parts for Houston right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ThomasTomasz said:

Givens is the only legitimate 7-8-9 inning arm left after this season.  Britton and Brach are hitting FA, and O'Day is as well and he's borderline for that kind of role right now.  They can't give him up without getting a much better piece in return than McHugh, who is just spare parts for Houston right now. 

I agree. I don't think the Orioles can afford to trade anyone from their ML bullpen at this stage if they hope to be competitive this year. With a healthy Britton, sure, but now? Nah. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I probably saw 100 Scott McGregor starts either in person or on TV.  I grew up with Scott McGregor in the rotation.  I used to play catch in the back yard doing a windup where I looped my hands over my knee like Scott McGregor and then threw across my body.  That may be part of the reason my should hurts right now...

But Scott McGregor was from a different era, the 1980s strikeout minima, where Ks/9 fell below 5.0 for the first time since the 1950s.  He was backed by a very good defense and a solid offense, and he was very good.  But as soon as the game started to change a little, power went up, Ks went up... he was basically done as an effective pitcher at 30.  1987 looks more like today than any other year in his career, and even though he was just 33 he had a 6.64 ERA.

I would bet his ERA rose as his 88 mph fastball dipped to 85 - 86. League offensive statistics did not rise as much as McGregor's ERA did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, wildbillhiccup said:

It's usually much simpler than we all make it out to be. If they were going to go cheap, Garcia should have been one of their primary targets. I would have been a lot more comfortable with a two year deal for him then Cashner. Even if he didn't want to pitch here I seriously doubt he'd accept a 1 year deal over a 2 year deal. 

Mike Friers accepted a one-year offer from another team over a 2-year offer from the Orioles just a couple of months ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

There have been seven pitchers in the last five years who had a K rate under 5.00, and qualified for the ERA title.

Kevin Correia, 2013.  In 2014 he posted a 5.44 ERA, and in 2015 he pitched the last 23 innings of his career.
Jeremy Guthrie, 2013.  In 2014 he actually upped his K rate and had a better year.  In 2015 his ERA was 5.95 and his career essentially ended.
Martin Perez, 2016.  In 2017 he had a 4.82 ERA.
Cashner, Perez' teammate.
Ty Blach, 2017.  Obviously we don't know about 2018 yet. In '17 he had a 4.78 ERA, good for a 87 ERA+.
Mark Buehrle, 2015.  Retired after the season.
Mike Pelfrey, 2015.  In the following two years he combined to throw 239 innings to a 5.50.

"Ground ball pitcher" is a descriptive term, not a quality measurement.

This, my friends, is why I choose to "pay the big bucks" for my Plus membership!  :clap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Redskins Rick said:

I have concerns about how well this would play out.

But, I am not going to throw stones at something that hasn't happen yet.

Just because he is a player, automatically mean he can't be a GM.

How do other GM get their first GM job, they don't just wake up and now you are a GM?

 

Right, there are plenty of GMs now that do not have the experience that GMs 30 years ago had. Brady's lack of experience should not be the focus of his ability or inability to do the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I probably saw 100 Scott McGregor starts either in person or on TV.  I grew up with Scott McGregor in the rotation.  I used to play catch in the back yard doing a windup where I looped my hands over my knee like Scott McGregor and then threw across my body.  That may be part of the reason my should hurts right now...

But Scott McGregor was from a different era, the 1980s strikeout minima, where Ks/9 fell below 5.0 for the first time since the 1950s.  He was backed by a very good defense and a solid offense, and he was very good.  But as soon as the game started to change a little, power went up, Ks went up... he was basically done as an effective pitcher at 30.  1987 looks more like today than any other year in his career, and even though he was just 33 he had a 6.64 ERA.

I agree, but I think that if McGregor had come up in today's environment he might well have found a way to be successful.

Here's a pretty good game Scott pitched in October 1983, letting up no runs on 5 hits, with 6 Ks. 

https://www.youtube.com/watc

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...