Jump to content

LH Hitting UTL?


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

Posted

Do we really need a true UTIL guy?  Beckham can play 3B, SS and 2B. Machado can play 3B and SS. Machado and Schoop usually play all 162. 

We really just need a guy that is competent at 3B. That guy doesn’t have to be some light hitting classic UTIL guy. 

Guys like Valencia, Peralta, Escobar, Aviles, Hill, Coghlan, make sense. 

Posted
46 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

We need both; a left handed batter and a utility infielder. Are there any on the market that are both LH hitting and can play multiple infield positions?

Stephen Drew

Posted
31 minutes ago, NedFromYork said:

John Jay would be a great pick up, high OBP guy which this team needs badly.  What's he expected to get?  Pretty cheap for you get I would guess.

Hes the guy I want.

Posted

Can we have a decent bench one year?  This seems like a great year to have one. Lots of vets out there are unsigned. 

Bench-

Sisco

Santander

Rickard

UTIL Bat- Drew, Valencia, Escobar  etc...  Doesn’t have to be a guy like Ruben Tejeda  

Then a OF type to replace Santander after 45 days. Gentry. Maybe bring in a Bourn type. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • By some defensive metrics, Ryan Mountcastle and 2024 Gold Glove winner Carlos Santana are similar:  https://www.fieldingbible.com/drs-leaderboard/players?position=3 FWIW Luis Castillo's value at Baseball Trade Values has jumped from a negative $30.6 million on November 8, to a negative $6.1 million on November 22, to a positive $5.5 million on December 2 to a positive $2.8 million Monday to a positive $7.7 million Friday evening. The Mariners will continue to monitor Castillo's trade value as the pitching market evolves this offseason. Trade offers should determine Castillo's trade value although his no-trade clause complicates matters.
    • Context matters.  Really I should have made a much longer post incorporating the following image.   The O's are roughly 20th in revenue.  (TBH, I have some questions about that.  I think it might be lower) They're currently 19th in payroll.  Is it really fair to say they're underspending?  (Mind you this chart is a few years older.) There are a lot of people claiming they can spend 200 a year on salary.  Maybe.  But it's fair to say team's with similar payrolls don't do that.
    • This is true, but the problem remains if you sign some guy to a 7 year contract, while that money might be palatable in 2026, it could quickly grow not so in the upcoming years.  Obviously, if you could sign Burnes for 1/2 years you'd do it; but that isn't really an option.
    • What happened in the 2nd half w Adley is puzzling. I would say however that 17 mill in 2027 should be more like 10% of the payroll, so far more palatable than 20%.
    • You have to look at payroll in context though thinking 3 years in advance compared to what league average will be with revenue increasing.  This is league average payroll.   2019 112 million 2020 58 million but was Covid year. 2021 120 million 2022 134 million 2023  150 million 2024 156 million So league average is up 36 million 4 years.  If it keeps around that pace league average should be over 180 million so that 100 million would be little over half of league average payroll.  
    • This is drastically underestimating Paredes
    • they did not. 2 big moves so far, bring in Fried and Williams, but lose Holmes anf Cortez, Not to mention Soto. Oblivious there not yet but as it stands now they are not as good. and god forbid Stanton regresses or Judge gets hurt. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...