Jump to content

Redsox versus Yankees


Fan4Life

Recommended Posts

Who should we be pulling for?

Sox to sweep, Yanks to sweep...

For us to have an opportunity to gain the most ground I suppose I want the Yankees to win 2 out of 3. However, a Sox sweep allowing us to pull into 3rd place won't hurt my feelings... we have the Sox for 3 at home coming up soon anyway...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who should we be pulling for?

Sox to sweep, Yanks to sweep...

For us to have an opportunity to gain the most ground I suppose I want the Yankees to win 2 out of 3. However, a Sox sweep allowing us to pull into 3rd place won't hurt my feelings... we have the Sox for 3 at home coming up soon anyway...

Isn't it a 4 game series?

Anyway, I don't really care who wins, but I'd like to see some 20-19 or 18-17 scores every game of the series...just wear their starters and bullpen out.

A brawl or two would be entertaining too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I want a split. Then again should Boston and Tampa somehow combine to go 6-0 at the stadium over the next 7 days, the Evil Empire would be all but done this year and we would only have Pink Hat Nation to destroy, which would not be a bad thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who should we be pulling for?

Sox to sweep, Yanks to sweep...

For us to have an opportunity to gain the most ground I suppose I want the Yankees to win 2 out of 3. However, a Sox sweep allowing us to pull into 3rd place won't hurt my feelings... we have the Sox for 3 at home coming up soon anyway...

I don't know about you guys, but I'm rooting for a giant sinkhole to form and swallow the entire field. :pray::gallden::smile11:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I want a split. Then again should Boston and Tampa somehow combine to go 6-0 at the stadium over the next 7 days, the Evil Empire would be all but done this year and we would only have Pink Hat Nation to destroy, which would not be a bad thing.
I don't know about you guys, but I'm rooting for a giant sinkhole to form and swallow the entire field. :pray::gallden::smile11:

This thread is like the guy in the bar in June of 1941 asking: "Stalin or Hitler...who you got in this Eastern Front thing?" :wedge:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really hoping for a showdown between Giambi's mustache and Youkilis's beard. Or perhaps they're deserving of proper-noun status? Giambi's Mustache v. Youkilis's Beard.

One player might absorb the other and they will become a monster, blinding any pitcher that dares look into the center of its greasy, tangled facial hair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really hoping for a showdown between Giambi's mustache and Youkilis's beard. Or perhaps they're deserving of proper-noun status? Giambi's Mustache v. Youkilis's Beard.

I very rarely hate a player. A team, sure... but almost never a player.

However, Youkilis is really starting to get on my nerves.

It has nothing to do with his play, and everything to do with his manner.

I hope bad things happen to him, which I know is wrong but there you are...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Sure, totally agree with you there. But they were definitely contributors to the thinktank there, and they assuredly have taken a lot from Luhnow and the rest of the gang there.  And we now have over half a decade of data from Baltimore. If we were back in the year 2020, I would say “not enough information, we don’t know yet what they’ll do or how they’ll operate separate from the rest of that group.” But it’s been a while now, and I just haven’t seen anything that leads me to believe they’ll trade one or more players that they have drafted and developed into an elite prospect. Have you? I’m not asking to be a jerk, I’m honestly curious if you’ve seen anything different that leads you to believe that is something they’d do.  If they have a major flaw as a group, I think it’s that they’re more than a little rigid. This last draft really hammered home the point that they know what they think is the best approach and they’re not going to diverge from that path, regardless of the circumstances (or the momentary needs of the organization). I think this makes them frustrating at times, but also very easy to predict.  The common thread in every major buy-side trade they’ve been a part of in 17 years is buying low on proven assets. The Cardinals grabbed Holliday in that weird period where the A’s had gotten him but ended up not wanting to keep him. The Astros picked up Carlos Gomez in the middle of an injury-plagued year where he’d taken a step back from his previous all-star status. They snagged Verlander at the August deadline when his fastball was down and his ERA was up. They stole Cole when he was coming off a down year and approaching FA. And the O’s nabbed Burnes in a similar posture. Skubal is the opposite of all those guys. He’s not quite as proven (or durable) as their typical trade target, and he’s at the absolute highest point of his value right now. I just don’t see them talking themselves into “buying high” on a guy, especially when the cost is so astronomical. If I was trying to make an educated guess about who fits their usual mold, someone like Sandy Alcantara in the offseason would make perfect sense. But right now…maybe Luis Castillo? His numbers are down across the board, he’s sliding down the rotation in Seattle (from ace to maybe #4 now?), but he’s also a proven commodity who is a pretty sure bet to give you almost 200 innings every year. Could they work a deal involving some MLB offensive pieces (in addition to prospect value of course) to pry Castillo loose? That would be a pretty Elias/Sig move.
    • I don’t get that at all. The fit makes no sense
    • There was an article recently that connected the Phillies to Mullins but I don't think it speculated on the return or if anyone else would be included.
    • You don't stop at picking up 2024 Kimbrel if you are all in. The Burnes move was great but he traded surplus for an expiring contract.  That's not an all in move.  That's more of a call than an all in.
    • You don't trade Ortiz & Hall for 1 year of Burnes if you're not all in.  I would be surprised if Elias didn't take a legit stab at this.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...