Jump to content

Orioles Deal Gausman/O'Day to Braves - Schoop to Brewers


weams

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MrOrange82 said:

I think people should actually look up pictures of the guy before making proclamations about fatness.

He doesn't look muscular to me, but, as a professional athlete, I'd wager he's far more fit than the average person with his build. 

That said, I'd also wager that the stats page underestimates his weight by 10-20 pounds.

Looks stocky like Bundy.  I think they both could use some time working out with Brady Anderson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Lol extend?  We’re in trade mode baby. 

August 18’ - Valencia, Cashner, Joseph

July 19’ - Bundy, Givens, Bleier, Villar, Trumbo

I don't think Cashner gets through waivers.  His contract is pretty reasonable and he's pitched well at times this year.  I also don't think anyone trades for Joseph.  Valencia and Gentry will go, IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Bundy?

Anderson personally OK'd Bundy's workout regiment years ago.

 

Look at some pics of Bundy now versus last year.  He looks to me like he's put on some weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

It's long, needs some work on the load portion, raw bat speed is there and looks like he gets good natural loft. He's quite raw but the tools are there, risk/reward guy. 

Yea that's what I figured.  Thanks.

How does he stack up with Kristian Robinson? Whom I know we both like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, joelala said:

Yea that's what I figured.  Thanks.

How does he stack up with Kristian Robinson? Whom I know we both like.

Not the same ceiling, but higher floor. Robinson hasn't faced full season pitching with strong college pitchers yet, so there's the risk he doesn't hit a lick. JCE has put up an above average batting line in full season ball despite the less than ideal approach. Robinson is a better prospect, IMO, but not by a huge margin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Luke-OH said:

Not the same ceiling, but higher floor. Robinson hasn't faced full season pitching with strong college pitchers yet, so there's the risk he doesn't hit a lick. JCE has put up an above average batting line in full season ball despite the less than ideal approach. Robinson is a better prospect, IMO, but not by a huge margin. 

Awesome, thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Then we are obviously not done. If we can move Valencia , Trumbo, and Beckham after the deadline. Then hopefully move Bundy , Joseph, and Cashner in the offseason and Cobb hopefully at next years deadline pitching well.

Givens, Bundy, and Cashner could be moved in the offseason/next deadline, but that's it for getting any return of note and even then it won't be much.  We all think Valencia will go in August but not for anything useful.  I don't see Trumbo, Joseph and Beckham as having any value to other teams at all.  You gotta have some mediocre vets, journeyman, Rule 5, and AAAA guys playing the games for a while anyway.  Cobb could bounce back and be tradeable but he's owed a lot of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

Not the same ceiling, but higher floor. Robinson hasn't faced full season pitching with strong college pitchers yet, so there's the risk he doesn't hit a lick. JCE has put up an above average batting line in full season ball despite the less than ideal approach. Robinson is a better prospect, IMO, but not by a huge margin. 

What's your take on the full return on both deals? Didn't see it or hear your thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ISU94 said:

What's your take on the full return on both deals? Didn't see it or hear your thoughts.

My full take doesn't exsist yet, I haven't studied the prospects in the deals enough yet.

General thoughts are thumbs up for the Schoop deal, I'm high on Ortiz, Carmona is the type of upside guy the team needs, and Villar is a cheap controllable piece of MLB filler who could have some upside. 

Thumbs down for the Gausman deal, I like the upside of JCE, postional need as well (although that's not my focus in deals, it's a bonus), Cumberland has varying opinions (Fangraphs thinks he's the O's 4th best prospect, pipeline thinks he's the 30th) but I think the truth is somewhere in between, I don't know anything about Phillips or Zimmerman yet so hence the incomplete nature of my opinion. The 2.5M international money puts them in the driver's seat to sign VVM and will sign him if he likes money. Moving O'Day clears 12M ish in salary, which is a significant piece in the deal as well (not a fun part, but perhaps a necessary one).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

My full take doesn't exsist yet, I haven't studied the prospects in the deals enough yet.

General thoughts are thumbs up for the Schoop deal, I'm high on Ortiz, Carmona is the type of upside guy the team needs, and Villar is a cheap controllable piece of MLB filler who could have some upside. 

Thumbs down for the Gausman deal, I like the upside of JCE, postional need as well (although that's not my focus in deals, it's a bonus), Cumberland has varying opinions (Fangraphs thinks he's the O's 4th best prospect, pipeline thinks he's the 30th) but I think the truth is somewhere in between, I don't know anything about Phillips or Zimmerman yet so hence the incomplete nature of my opinion. The 2.5M international money puts them in the driver's seat to sign VVM and will sign him if he likes money. Moving O'Day clears 12M ish in salary, which is a significant piece in the deal as well (not a fun part, but perhaps a necessary one).

Gotcha. Thanks for the quick write-up.

Looking forward to your thoughts on Zimmerman. Looks like a guy who fell through the cracks, ATL scooped up, and they were reaping the benefits as he's showing this year so far (signed him for dirt cheap after they drafted him last year, stuff is a tick up this year from what he was, etc.).

Phillips looks like a solid RP for us down the road. 

At least that's my outlook on the two arms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...