Jump to content

Orioles Deal Gausman/O'Day to Braves - Schoop to Brewers


weams

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Cy Bundy said:

Fortunately Tobias Myers isn’t doing much at this point. 

Not sure your source of information ….

Myer has a 2.86 ERA last 10 starts with 65 baserunners in 56.2 IP and 47 Ks in Low A full season ball.

He is doing just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Encarnacion sounds like Jomar Reyes to me.   

similar tools, but Encarnacion is a better defender and athlete/runner. He projects to stay at third. May have better bat to ball skills and definitely has a higher ceiling. Reyes' ceiling was limited due to defensive questions and contact questions. For Encarnacion, like many raw prospects, the questions are based on ability to carry performance against more advanced pitching(IMO, he will; reminds me of Mountcastle from 2016 but with a position).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Rojo13 said:

When we traded for Andy Miller, does anyone know where EROD was ranked in our prospect list?

What about when we traded for Bud Norris? Where was LJ Hoes and Hader ranked?

I believe that ERod was the 66th or something close prospect in baseball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

Encarnacion sounds like Jomar Reyes to me.   

I'm watching the swing, there is more looseness there and Encarnacion already lifts the ball, something Jomar has yet to figure out. Also, better chance to stick at 3B.

Jomar is bigger and has more raw power and more arm strength.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Thato'sfan said:

similar tools, but Encarnacion is a better defender and athlete/runner. He projects to stay at third. May have better bat to ball skills and definitely has a higher ceiling. Reyes' ceiling was limited due to defensive questions and contact questions. For Encarnacion, like many raw prospects, the questions are based on ability to carry performance against more advanced pitching(IMO, he will; reminds me of Mountcastle from 2016 but with a position).

I don't think Encarnacion has a higher ceiling, just a better chance at getting to his ceiling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

$12 Million, $2.5 Million

No one likes the prospect get in the Gausman deal, but these are the two most important numbers in that deal.  What the Orioles do with that money goes a long way in what this deal looks like in 3 years.

Get VVM, it gets better.

Use that $12 effectively, and it gets better.  Think of it this way, even if payroll doesn't balloon back up next year, that $12 million is a down payment on the player development increase to make sure all these prospects have a better chance of reaching their potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DirtyBird said:

How did the context-neutral stats say the Givens did today?

I've been working since 7 this morning, so I don't know.  Nonetheless, even if he gave up eight runs it doesn't change my position.  

MLB FOs don't evaluate pitchers using ERA. They try to evaluate as context neutral as possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, awannabegeek said:

I've been working since 7 this morning, so I don't know.  Nonetheless, even if he gave up eight runs it doesn't change my position.  

MLB FOs don't evaluate pitchers using ERA. They try to evaluate as context neutral as possible. 

You mean a stat that makes you look good as long as you strike guys out and don't give up HR's?

Based on the way the deadline went down, I guess FOs didn't value Givens too high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/31/2018 at 5:10 PM, ISU94 said:

Glasnow is a reliever, Meadows shine has come off.

Wasn't great.

He sure looked like a starting pitcher last night. Glasnow has always had great stuff...his problem has been the walks. He seems to have solved that problem. 9 Ks and 0 walks in 4 innings last night. In a few years I think we're all going to be talking abut how the Rays robbed the Pirates in the Archer trade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

He sure looked like a starting pitcher last night. Glasnow has always had great stuff...his problem has been the walks. He seems to have solved that problem. 9 Ks and 0 walks in 4 innings last night. In a few years I think we're all going to be talking abut how the Rays robbed the Pirates in the Archer trade. 

One four inning appearance against the worst team in baseball doesn't really prove much. A lot of people don't consider him much of a SP prospect anymore. The stuff is there for a dominant reliever but I doubt he has the makeup of a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

He sure looked like a starting pitcher last night. Glasnow has always had great stuff...his problem has been the walks. He seems to have solved that problem. 9 Ks and 0 walks in 4 innings last night. In a few years I think we're all going to be talking abut how the Rays robbed the Pirates in the Archer trade. 

High K's and low BB's facing the O's... He must be legit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...