Jump to content

Grade the Gausman Deal


Frobby

Grade the Gausman Deal  

187 members have voted

  1. 1. What’s your grade for the Gausman deal


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 08/11/18 at 01:24

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 795
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, eddie83 said:

Then why did they make the deal? What good is the Int money? 

I guess we will find out. It was only meaningful as a trade asset to the Braves, they couldn't spend it anyway because they were over the limit in the past. Hopefully the Orioles use it and get something out of it. Would love to be wrong. A cost-controlled mid-rotation starter should bring back more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Enjoy Terror said:

The whole thing reminds me Arrieta. A hugely talented pitcher that the Orioles can’t squeeze anything out of.

They had to trade Arrieta, he was unplayable at the end. Gausman was still a solid mid-rotation pitcher for the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Simple poll.    Let’s see how it grades out.   

It's really not simple. As others have implied, it's actually premature. IMO, whatever international players the O's wind up signing should be strongly factored into the perceived quality of this trade. Just can't assess at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted B. Could be an A if we get VVM and some extra int'l prospects. We got a back end starter type in Zimmerman, A super high ceiling young 3b in Encarnacion, backup catcher with a moderate ceiling, MLB ready reliever with mid 90's fastball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are looking at this as Gausman, O’Day for the 4 prospects plus VVM and money saved, then I guess it’s fine.  I’d probably say B.  If we don’t land VVM this is almost certainly a D.  If we land VVM but have more than 2.5 million remaining in our bonus pool for this year when it expires, then this is maybe a C+.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MurphDogg said:

I guess we will find out. It was only meaningful as a trade asset to the Braves, they couldn't spend it anyway because they were over the limit in the past. Hopefully the Orioles use it and get something out of it. Would love to be wrong. A cost-controlled mid-rotation starter should bring back more.

It makes no sense to acquire that money if it isn’t going to be used. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eddie83 said:

It makes no sense to acquire that money if it isn’t going to be used. 

Indeed. I guess time will tell. I don't have a ton of faith in the Orioles using all of their international slot money, and I have even less faith in them using it particularly well since they have such a limited amount of international scouting infrastructure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MurphDogg said:

Indeed. I guess time will tell. I don't have a ton of faith in the Orioles using all of their international slot money, and I have even less faith in them using it particularly well since they have such a limited amount of international scouting infrastructure.

Is this money isn’t for a top Int player then the deal makes no sense at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I graded this an F.  Not a single top ten prospect back for a mid-rotation innings eater with 2.5 years of team control left. The return was poor, probably a D.  But the fact that there was no rush to trade the guy (not an expiring contract) and they jumped at this deal anyway, makes it an F for me.  

I'm not tough to please either.  I gave positive grades to both the Machado and Britton deal and will give a similar grade for the Schoop return. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • HEY YANKEES! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnxNRPy_SOA
    • Yeah I'm all for sportsmanship but seeing 'Congratulations Yankees' at or near the top of the board is sickening, not gonna lie.  There is no high road when it comes to these clowns.  Boone's constant whining, the well-documented HP ump favoritism (I don't care if its framing or whatever, its happening, and its annoying AF), the whining about Judge getting hit on the hand while their guys constantly pitch inside including of course the Kjerstad play where they were literally cutting up on the bench as he lay prone on home plate, the ginormous payroll, the incredibly entitled fan base booing at pitches being called balls that are three inches off the plate, that stupid roll call, that stupid whistle after strikeouts, the stupid national media drooling over a Judge v Ohtani WS possibility, Nestor Cortes and his dumb mustache, the mediocre stadium that is revered simply because its called Yankee Stadium, the ridiculously short RF porch, the Soto Shuffle or whatever the hell it is. Congratulations my ass.  Screw those dudes.
    • Here's the deal. I doubt anyone on the Yankee's board congradulated us last year. This year they won the East. Whippie for them. It's like saying the IRS won tax season. IF, we do anything in the playoffs, we may meet again. But there are some significant hurdles before that. And they could easily lose along the way. Cleveland, Houston, Detroit, and KC are no walk in the park. I'll root for the O's to go as far as they can and that the Yankees are one and done. We are in. I hope we win one more so we play the opening round in Oriole Park. If not, we are still in and have to do what we got to do to go anywhere. Two years in a row. While the Red Sox, Blue Jays, and Tampa sleep. Year two with a heck of a lot more obstacles. This may not be a WS year but we are competitive, young, and a hell of a lot classier than that bunch in the Bronx. 
    • The usage of Cano last night was poor, I don't even blame him really.  Yankees had 9-1-2 coming up, and Torres is well known (based on the telecast) to hit Cano well, and hit sinkers well.  He laced that hit to RF off him on Tuesday where the Yanks screwed up the baserunning.  And Soto got a hit off him that same inning.  So it was pretty predictable that these guys were going to tee off when he came in, and that's exactly what happened. Not to mention he's pitched a lot recently, and Burnes should have pitched another inning anyway.  Just baffling decisions by Hyde last night, and I'm not one to generally question those types of things.  Even if the Burnes thing was pre-ordained, the choice of Cano for that moment was terrible.
    • Why is this thread on the Oriole Talk section.    It probably does not belong on the OriolesHangout  at all but if it stays it should be on the MLB section.
    • If there's two outs and its not Judge in the hole, I'm probably going with Perez, crossing my fingers he gets the lefty, and then starting fresh the next inning with Coulombe or someone else.  If there's one out, I'm going w/ Coulombe.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...