Jump to content

Grade the Gausman Deal


Frobby

Grade the Gausman Deal  

187 members have voted

  1. 1. What’s your grade for the Gausman deal


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 08/11/18 at 01:24

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

Keep in mind that a big chunk (I believe 10M?) of Davis' money is deferred.

Its actually more than that:

Deferred

Minus 4.5m deferred from Cobb

Minus 6m deferred from Davis

Minus 1m deferred from O’Day

Minus 1.5m deferred from Trumbo

Minus 1.5 deferred  from Cashner

14.5m total deferred

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 795
  • Created
  • Last Reply
42 minutes ago, 99ct said:

Yeah, fair enough, but how do you reconcile that with the fact that he just got an MLB start, despite being younger than most (or all?) of the dudes on your list? To me, his promotion is evidence that he was not, in fact, the 8th man down, as you believe.  

From following the prospects closely - and the fact that he started out the season in Single A ball - while they had 2 20 year old starting pitchers start the season in AAA and 1 in the majors.  If you'll notice, those other 8 pitchers are all very good to outstanding prospects - the best group in baseball.  Point being, the Braves could have afforded to trade someone like Wilson, and there's still a reasonable chance he won't be in their rotation next year or the year after because they have so much talented depth.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

I believe most MLB clubs operate this way. Attendance is not what makes them profitable.

Attendance isn’t the only source of revenue, but it’s a major source.    In 2017 gate receipts were $54 mm of $252 mm in total revenue for the O’s.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 99ct said:

Yeah, fair enough, but how do you reconcile that with the fact that he just got an MLB start, despite being younger than most (or all?) of the dudes on your list? To me, his promotion is evidence that he was not, in fact, the 8th man down, as you believe.  

Promotions are a terrible way to judge prospect status/level. Just look at who the Orioles promote to make scratch starts, etc. Geez, they promoted Jeff Fiorentino in 2005 from Frederick to play a few games in the outfield...and that definitely wasn't because he was the top prospect in the system. Teams do weird things regarding promotions and they are often most conservative with some of the better prospects, especially now that teams think about service time issues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

Actually, the Bud Norris trade is a pretty good comp for the Gausman trade.   Norris had 2+ years of control remaining, same as Gausman.   He had a 4.33 career ERA (91 ERA+) in 689.2 IP.   He was having a good year at the time of the trade, 3.87 ERA, 103 ERA+.    He also was already under contract through 2015, at $3 mm (1/3 paid by the Orioles), $5.3 mm and $8.8 mm.   Gausman had a 4.22 ERA (100 ERA+) in 763.2 career innings, and this year was at 4.43 (95).   He is being paid $5.6 mm this year ($1.9 mm by Atlanta), and we can assume he’ll be significantly more expensive than Norris over the next two years.

Norris netted LJ Hoes (one of our top 5 prospects, fully baked, but not a top 100 guy by any means), Josh Hader (having a very good season at Delmarva at 19, probably considered a top 10 guy in our system but not top 5 at that point), and a 1st round supplemental pick that turned out to be the no. 37 pick.   

So, putting aside the hindsight on Hader, how good was that package compared to what the O’s got for Gausman?    I’d say they’re very similar, not knowing how Encarnacion etc. will turn out.   Gausman is probably considered to be a bit better than Norris, and I’d say the package we got was a bit better, too (again, setting aside how Hader has turned out and just considering what he was at the time).    

The comparison to Bud Norris is painful. Painful because I want to defend Gausman and tell you that you are crazy, but a hard look at the numbers paints a harsh portrait of Gausman. He's much closer to being Bud Norris than I wanted to believe. Gausman has pitched 780+ innings in the bigs and is sporting a 100 ERA+. That kind of says it all. He's an average pitcher by almost all measures. The radar gun says he should be better, but the results speak for themselves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Ruzious said:

I'm a Braves fan, and I've been following their minor leagues very closely for years, so I'm not talking out of my ass.

These are starting pitching prospects that were ahead of Wilson at the time of the trade:

Touki Toussaint

Kolby Allard

Mike Soroka

Ian Anderson

Kyle Wright

Luis Gohara

Joey Wentz

Max Fried - maybe not technically a rookie, but he's played most of the season in the minors, and they are still very high on him.  

That's 8 young guys that were not in the Braves rotation rated ahead of Wilson, and some would have put Kyle Muller up there with Wilson.  And if they had signed their high 1st rounder - Carter Stewart - he likely would have been rated up there, as well.  Instead, they get the 9th pick in next year's draft.  The Braves have the best group of young pitchers that any organization in baseball has - maybe the best they've ever had - and they once had Glavine, Smoltz, and Avery.  

If anyone says they expected Wilson to pitch in the majors this early, they're lying.  The Braves were and are in a pennant race, and Gausman was a huge get for them for which they gave up basically nothing of value to them.  And they have him for 2 more years - so this was no rental move for them like a lot of the trades before the deadline were.  And that's a major reason why the trade package should have been much bigger than it was, imo.          

But I thought Gausman sucked? I thought he was replacement level?

I guess the idiotic Braves organization doesn't know how to evaluate pitchers like we do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Ruzious said:

I'm a Braves fan, and I've been following their minor leagues very closely for years, so I'm not talking out of my ass.

These are starting pitching prospects that were ahead of Wilson at the time of the trade:

Touki Toussaint

Kolby Allard

Mike Soroka

Ian Anderson

Kyle Wright

Luis Gohara

Joey Wentz

Max Fried - maybe not technically a rookie, but he's played most of the season in the minors, and they are still very high on him.  

That's 8 young guys that were not in the Braves rotation rated ahead of Wilson, and some would have put Kyle Muller up there with Wilson.  And if they had signed their high 1st rounder - Carter Stewart - he likely would have been rated up there, as well.  Instead, they get the 9th pick in next year's draft.  The Braves have the best group of young pitchers that any organization in baseball has - maybe the best they've ever had - and they once had Glavine, Smoltz, and Avery.  

If anyone says they expected Wilson to pitch in the majors this early, they're lying.  The Braves were and are in a pennant race, and Gausman was a huge get for them for which they gave up basically nothing of value to them.  And they have him for 2 more years - so this was no rental move for them like a lot of the trades before the deadline were.  And that's a major reason why the trade package should have been much bigger than it was, imo.          

Duq got fleeced.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...