Jump to content

Orioles Spend 250k of their International Money ( Report that it was $750k)


weams

Recommended Posts

Notwithstanding that the optics of this deal are horrible, this move shouldn’t be surprising to anyone. The Orioles had no shot to spend all of their allotment unless they gave almost all of it to VVM and Gaston. 

If the Orioles are going to play in the Latin American market, it’s going to take years to see tangible results, as most of the talent for next year is already committed. VVM and Gaston present a somewhat unique opportunity this year. I seriously doubt that trading $250,000 for this player will prohibit the O’s from signing VVM, or VVM and Gaston if that’s what they want to do and those players want to sign with the O’s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 392
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 minutes ago, Sydnor said:

Notwithstanding that the optics of this deal are horrible, this move shouldn’t be surprising to anyone. The Orioles had no shot to spend all of their allotment unless they gave almost all of it to VVM and Gaston. 

If the Orioles are going to play in the Latin American market, it’s going to take years to see tangible results, as most of the talent for next year is already committed. VVM and Gaston present a somewhat unique opportunity this year. I seriously doubt that trading $250,000 for this player will prohibit the O’s from signing VVM, or VVM and Gaston if that’s what they want to do and those players want to sign with the O’s.

We are the Orioles. We play in Baltimore. We don't care about stinking optics. Delmon Young is one of our heros. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weams said:

We are the Orioles. We play in Baltimore. We don't care about stinking optics. Delmon Young is one of our heros. 

I think the optics do matter. They matter to me when I decide whether I want to make a financial commitment for tickets to 29 games. While I’m not endorsing bringing Buck back, he was unquestionably right when he said you’ve got to be honest with the fan base. Selling slot money after you said you’re going to be active internationally appears dishonest (and I’ve already said I don’t think it was a huge deal).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Sydnor said:

I think the optics do matter. They matter to me when I decide whether I want to make a financial commitment for tickets to 29 games. While I’m not endorsing bringing Buck back, he was unquestionably right when he said you’ve got to be honest with the fan base. Selling slot money after you said you’re going to be active internationally appears dishonest (and I’ve already said I don’t think it was a huge deal).

This 100%. This type of move is inconsequential to helping the club, and sends totally the wrong message.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Enjoy Terror said:

That should’ve been cleared up well before any sort of mea culpa was necessary. They literally just had to ask Adam Jones if he was going to waive his 10/5. The very first thing that should’ve been done. That’s reckless levels of incompetence if they couldn’t get that right.

How would that work? Jones wasn't going to waive his no trade clause unless the situation was right. How would they know if the situation was right without trying to see what was available?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

As a reminder, we traded Brad Brach for $250,000 in slot allotments.    So would we have been happy if we had traded Brach straight up for Zoellner?   Personally, I would have thought that trade sucked.

Oh it would really suck. And Zoellner as a throw in would have been meaningless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

And that's worth 250K in international slot money?

Don't be silly. It's the Orioles, so he's worth 750K in international slot money.

Totally unrelated, I'd like to change my Dan vote in the "keep Dan and/or Buck" thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, FlipTheBird said:

Dan Connolly is saying his sources are reporting its $750k... which would be mind-boggling.

Source.

Mind-boggling is a good way to put it. Maybe they thought they were trading for a different player. Are they assigning him to Frederick or Bowie, where player his age play? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Per Roch, Selby is the call up today, with Davidson presumably DFA.   Guessing today’s pitching looks like:  - Suarez (2-3 IP)  - Webb (1 IP)  - Soto (1 IP)  - Dominguez (1 IP)  - Coulombe (1 IP)  - Selby (2 IP) Bowman fills in gaps as needed.
    • Holliday and Henderson is going to be an elite top 2 in the lineup.
    • He’s also replaced the leg kick with a toe tap. At least with two strikes I noticed. 
    • Last year, of 8 WC teams: - 5 went with 12 pitchers - 2 went with 11 pitchers - 1 went with 13 pitchers I expect the Orioles to go with 12 pitchers. Given how Detroit mixes and matches pitching, we need to have enough platoon options.   I do think there is value in having more pitchers, even if it’s just an extra guy for mop up duty that saves pen in blowout game 2 so we aren’t running on fumes in game 3. However, I think 14 position players and 12 pitchers is the right balance for the wild card series.
    • I don't think this is true.  He's struck out 3 times a few times and gone 0-4 several times and 10 posts haven't been made. I hope he has a nice view from the bench during the playoff series and gets an at bat here or there if we're up big or getting blown out.  I'd like to see him put in a lot of work this offseason and start 2025 on fire.
    • I’m not sure why people continue to ignore the ages of Norby and Stowers and how that effected their value. The Marlins received a 21 and 23 year old for Puk. Of course the Marlins still ended up with our 2 “old guys” but that was a last minute trade. They may not have known they would deal Rogers at the time and Puk was dealt earlier and may have carried more value. That said, it’s very possible Elias valued the long term starter over the short term reliever..and I agree that’s a mistake.
    • Ok so not to beat a dead horse, but AJ Puk got me thinking. I know hindsight is 20/20 and I’ve got a Gator bias, but to my eyes, what the Dbacks gave up for AJ Puk is comparable to what we gave up for Soto or Rogers. If you’re Elias, why not target someone like this on the Marlins if you’re already scouting Rogers? It just highlights for me Elias’ failure to address the bullpen with ML acquistions (deadline or FA). It is becoming a real ding to putting us over the top thus far and is definitely the biggest concern we have going into this postseason. I came away satisfied enough at the deadline but can’t help but wonder if we perhaps could have combo’d getting Rogers and Puk with an additional fringe top 10 throw in? I’m still hoping that Rogers gains a few ticks back on his heater (a la Tillman in 2012) and that our bullpen will perform OK in these playoffs. But as much as I love Elias, I’m coming around to the fact that thus far, I think he’s made some head scratching decisions/non-decisions when it comes to the bullpen.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...