Jump to content

Rank the #1 Draft Disappointments


now

Rank the #1 Draft Disappointments  

126 members have voted

  1. 1. Who has been most disappointing to you as a #1 draft choice, over the last 20 years? (objective or subjective) (multiple choices possible)

    • 2016 Cody Sedlock
      1
    • 2013 Hunter Harvey
      6
    • 2012 Kevin Gausman
      0
    • 2011 Dylan Bundy
      3
    • 2009 Matt Hopgood
      57
    • 2008 Brian Matusz
      18
    • 2007 Matt Wieters
      6
    • 2006 Billy Rowell
      53
    • 2004 Wade Townsend
      11
    • 2002 Adam Loewen
      16


Recommended Posts

Who has been most disappointing to you as a #1 draft choice, over the last 20 years?

Your choice can be objective ("This means WAR!") or subjective (personal disappointment).

It can reflect injuries, a career that stalled, or sheer overhype ("the switch-hitting Jesus").

Fire away!

PS Poll limit is 10, so I stopped short of Chris Smith, Beau Hale, Mike Paradis, et al.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rowell.

I understand the frustration with the Hobgood situation, but that wasn't that kids fault.  It's not his fault that the Orioles are stupid.  I didn't like the pick, I don't think anyone really did.  But I'm not going to hold the Orioles stupidity against that guy.

Rowell was just a big flameout.  And then he started hitting the reefer with Corn and got an attitude problem.  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Rowell.

I understand the frustration with the Hobgood situation, but that wasn't that kids fault.  It's not his fault that the Orioles are stupid.  I didn't like the pick, I don't think anyone really did.  But I'm not going to hold the Orioles stupidity against that guy.

Rowell was just a big flameout.  And then he started hitting the reefer with Corn and got an attitude problem.  

I'm looking at it from the opposite angle.  I don't fault the O's for the Rowell pick since he was a reasonable selection at that point in the draft.  Hobgood wasn't.  I don't blame Hobgood for getting hurt and not being good but it was a bad pick, why pick a high risk guy with a relatively low ceiling in the top 5?

So while I was more disappointed with Rowell as a player I was more disappointed with the Hobgood selection.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm looking at it from the opposite angle.  I don't fault the O's for the Rowell pick since we was a reasonable selection at that point in the draft.  Hobgood wasn't.  I don't blame Hobgood for getting hurt and not being good but it was a bad pick, why pick a high risk guy with a relatively low ceiling in the top 5?

So while I was more disappointed with Rowell as a player I was more disappointed with the Hobgood selection.

I hear ya.  I don't necessarily disagree and I understand where you're coming from.  But as you said, we're looking at it from different angles.  

I was disappointed with the Hobgood selection, too.  But knowing that he was a reach made me adjust expectations accordingly.  Rowell was a prep stud, lit it up in his first season and then just couldn't hack it.  Hobgood was a big question from the start.

But to answer your question....Orioles stupidity.  I'm not sure why they went that route but they did.  It was dumb.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unquestionably Hopgood. 

Some of these guys were just not great players, and at the very worst an indictment of the development or scouting departments.

Hobgood was a failure of ownership, who punted on the draft at a time when they needed a miracle the most. It was a truly reckless maneuver to cost cut here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

Unquestionably Hopgood. 

Some of these guys were just not great players, and at the very worst an indictment of the development or scouting departments.

Hobgood was a failure of ownership, who punted on the draft at a time when they needed a miracle the most. It was a truly reckless maneuver to cost cut here.

That was Townsend not Hobgood.  O's spent 8.8M on the Hobgood draft.  They gave Coffey a million and Ohlman somewhere around the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

That was Townsend not Hobgood.  O's spent 8.8M on the Hobgood draft.  They have Coffey a million and Ohlman somewhere around the same.

Townsend was a last minute audible when Angelos went in the draft room and demanded they draft a college pitcher.  They were set to draft a SS, either Chris Nelson or Stephen Drew.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • With a previous post in this thread I highlighted a selection of notable or memorable comps for our current Orioles. Now I wonder what it would look like to compare our best roster (from that selected list, in order of WAR) with the corresponding squad of not-all-stars.   Without further ado, here's our team alongside its historic counterparts: LF    Norby        Eugenio Suarez CF    Mullins        Kevin Kiermaier RF    Cowser        Ken Singleton 1B    Mayo        Bill Melton 2B    Holliday    Arky Vaughan SS    Ortiz        Jose Pagan 3B    Henderson    Bill Madlock C    Ruthschman    Ted Simmons DH    Westburg    Robby Thompson     Bench    Mateo        Greg Gagne     SP1    Bradish        Justin Verlander SP2    Kremer        Johnny Cueto SP3    Rodriguez    Jose Berrios SP4    Povich        Jarrod Washburn     SP5    Irvin        Scott McGregor RP1    Pham        Jeff Samardzija RP2    McDermott    Steve Renko RP3    Vespi        Graeme Lloyd RP4    Baker        Matt Albers Closer    Bautista    Trevor Hoffman Oddly enough, it's the starting rotation that appears the strength of our team of doppelgangers.
    • Regarding Cooper, he was a fantastic pitching coach for a long time, but the game simply passed him by.  Near the end of his tenure, after a tough season Giolito actually went and worked with Ethan Katz (our current pitching coach and his former HS pitching coach) and he came back new and improved.  Katz also got a ton of credit for developing Cease and getting Rodon to finally tap into his potential. A year ago I would have been high on Katz, but last year was such a disaster that I’m not sure what to think.  It’s clear he’s got a much more modern take on pitching than Cooper, but I also think the org in general is so behind the times when it comes analytics & biometrics that there is only so much he can do.  We don’t have a single voice driving an org wide pitching philosophy (which is evident in our PD system) or much of a pitching lab to get the most out of guys.  Hopefully that will change for the better with the addition of Brian Bannister. All that being said, I don’t believe for a second we get all we can out of our guys.  Katz obviously helped Giolito, Cease, & Rodon improve but these were all elite prospects acquired from other orgs.  We still struggle to unlock the next tier of guys, although I blame that on broader organizational issues than purely Katz.
    • I love this.  Most fans that go to the game live within 45 minutes of the ballpark I would suspect.  The good thing is you can get home by 10:00 most evenings.  
    • I selfishly don't like it, I'm a displaced fan in the central time zone.  5:30 weeknight start times are rough for me, the games are usually over before I get home from the office.  But they should make decisions based on the people who might actually go to the games. 
    • That's something that can only be determined in hindsight.  Lots of options and lots of flexibility this offseason to really set the team up for the next 2-3 years.  I'm very curious to see how it plays out.  Checking my crystal ball, I don't see Aroldis Chapman anywhere on the program
    • I agree and I don't want him on the team.  But I'm not sure this specific moment is more critical than say, when he picked Gunnar Henderson in the second round.
    • Perhaps he looked and doesn’t have the dough to spend or wants to part with the asking price for Cease or 1 year of the other guys rumored available. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...