Jump to content

Connolly/Elias interview: Dominican facility upgrades, etc


interloper

Recommended Posts

I encourage folks to find a cheap trial for The Athletic. There's a great Connolly interview with Elias up right now. Here are three excerpts without totally copy/pasting the article. There are tons of questions and Elias, as usual, answers them impressively and as honestly as possible. https://theathletic.com/810663/

Quote

Would you say the Orioles’ Dominican facility ranks toward the bottom of big-league teams?

Well, I haven’t seen all 30. I’ve just heard that it’s nowhere near up to the standards that I want for the future of our development. Some of it is stuff that we can change in the short-term. Other things will take longer-term investments. It’s in a really good spot. We’ve got a really good landlord, Junior Naboa, who is good to work with and is an experienced landlord and there are a lot of good, neighboring teams. So, there are some positives. But we just want to have better development conditions for the players.

Quote

What’s one easy fix right now that can be made quickly and inexpensively to better your Latin program?

We’ll try to introduce some technology. We’re getting TrackMan (multi-data tracker) units installed as we speak. That’s a pretty major investment. I’m excited. I think we are going to get that in in time for minor league spring training in the Dominican. And we will introduce different strength and conditioning technologies, bat sensors, new weight equipment. So, there are things like that we can do very quickly in the near term.

Quote

Since we are on the Dominican, what is the latest with the Orioles’ pursuit of Yolbert Sanchez, the Cuban shortstop playing in the Dominican who is now free to sign with any MLB team?

All I can say is that we are in a position where we are on top of everything. So, Koby and the staff that we have and me, we’re looking at every avenue. We are sitting on a large pile of international (slot) pool money. As I’ve said, I don’t expect us to spend it all or even close to all of it (by June), but we are looking for every opportunity to do so and do so in a wise way. So, I think it goes without saying that as high-profile Cuban free agents or other international free agents suddenly become available after (last year’s) July 2 signing period, we are gonna be all over it in terms of vetting it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

He also touches on Venezuela, free agents, Karns, minor league signings, the catchers, shortstop, the draft, analytics, Brady Anderson... the list goes on.

An extremely comprehensive piece here, and it's not just PR word salad from Elias. Connolly asks some tough questions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going to post from this interview as well.  Elias confirms again there won’t be any multi-year deals signed.  

Quote

You had mentioned previously that one-year deals with free agents this offseason are likely your ceiling right now. You did that last week with pitcher Nathan Karns. Do you expect that kind of addition — major-league signings — to happen much more for the Orioles in the next few weeks?

I expect things to be pretty minor between now and into spring training. A big reason for that is, while there are ways to improve this team in the near term, clearly, we have to keep our eye on the ball. And part of that is not blocking playing time for young, controllable players that we have and that we have a chance to have for a very long time and who might be part of the next playoff team here in Baltimore. So, the degree to which I can avoid clogging up playing time for some of these guys that we really have got our eye on is very important.

Now, when it comes to pitching, there’s always innings to go around. We’ve got possibilities in the rotation right now. We’ve got possibilities in the bullpen. Nate Karns is someone that we view, in particular, as a huge talent upside for a number of reasons. Obviously, there is some injury risk with him. He didn’t pitch at all last year. Even the year prior he was banged up. But we waited and we looked at the value and the upside with his talent, and, just looking at things in total, we felt it was a worthwhile risk to take. And, if everything works out, he’s under control the following year as well. So, we think it makes sense for us for a lot of reasons. But I don’t anticipate any kind of free-agent signing frenzy here at the end. We’ve got to keep our eyes on the guys that we have in the organization and getting them better.

So, you anticipate any future signings to be of the minor-league variety?

I think it’s more likely minor leagues unless something changes. We want to get a mix in spring training that we feel like we’ve got a good group to compete for each position. I think as you’ve seen from some of our activities this winter, we’ve tried to make some minor moves in terms of improving our defensive options and adding some versatility on the roster. We’re certainly keeping our eyes opened and are assessing anything that becomes available, but at this point, I can’t say that something’s definitely going to happen.

 

When asked about Brady’s role, Mike talks about his value with team nutrition and strength and training.

Quote
USATSI_10228207-1024x682.jpg
Brady Anderson will be heavily involved in the Orioles’ nutritional program moving forward. (Michael Owens / USA Today)

Now that you have had some time with club vice president Brady Anderson, the highest-profile holdover from the previous regime, do you have a better sense of what you want his role and specific duties to be?

Brady has been involved in a lot of things here over the years, but he’s particularly been a driving force behind the nutritional programs and the strength and conditioning programs here, which have vastly improved under his watch. So, his involvement there is something I’m leaning on a lot. We haven’t been in camp yet, and so we’ll see how things evolve and progress going forward. But he’s been keeping up his work in the training space very heavily.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bradysburns said:

Kind of a sad statement on prior ownership/regime priorities... to put it mildly. 

Really, it's almost scandalous that a team like the Orioles would be so poorly established in DR. 

 But Elias give me hope! 

The real sad thing is it probably costs next to nothing to set up a decent facility in the Dominican Republic.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From MLB.com article from 2015:

According to Rafael Pérez, MLB director of Dominican operations, in the past 10 years 15 academies have been built at an average cost of $4 million each. The more modern and luxurious academies have cost $6 million to $8.5 million, a large sum compared to the $785,000 it cost to build Campo Las Palmas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will anger some folks, but I wouldn’t say it’s unexpected 

Quote

We are sitting on a large pile of international (slot) pool money. As I’ve said, I don’t expect us to spend it all or even close to all of it (by June), but we are looking for every opportunity to do so and do so in a wise way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

This will anger some folks, but I wouldn’t say it’s unexpected 

 

 

Meanwhile the Marlins have said they are trying to get as much additional slot money as possible.  When you are so badly outspent by the Marlins you know something is wrong.  I think Elias isn't allowed to spend the money by ownership. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, atomic said:

Meanwhile the Marlins have said they are trying to get as much additional slot money as possible.  When you are so badly outspent by the Marlins you know something is wrong.  I think Elias isn't allowed to spend the money by ownership. 

If that's true, why spend the time and money to upgrade the facilities, hire Koby, spend time in the DR himself? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, interloper said:

If that's true, why spend the time and money to upgrade the facilities, hire Koby, spend time in the DR himself? 

They haven't spent money to upgrade the facilities. They are talking nickle and dime stuff and they still will have the worst facility in DR in baseball. If they announce they are spending 5 million dollars plus on a new facility that is spending. Installing trackman to the worst facility in baseball? Give me a freaking break.  That is $30,000.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...