Jump to content

Connolly/Elias interview: Dominican facility upgrades, etc


interloper

Recommended Posts

I was going to post from this interview as well.  Elias confirms again there won’t be any multi-year deals signed.  

Quote

You had mentioned previously that one-year deals with free agents this offseason are likely your ceiling right now. You did that last week with pitcher Nathan Karns. Do you expect that kind of addition — major-league signings — to happen much more for the Orioles in the next few weeks?

I expect things to be pretty minor between now and into spring training. A big reason for that is, while there are ways to improve this team in the near term, clearly, we have to keep our eye on the ball. And part of that is not blocking playing time for young, controllable players that we have and that we have a chance to have for a very long time and who might be part of the next playoff team here in Baltimore. So, the degree to which I can avoid clogging up playing time for some of these guys that we really have got our eye on is very important.

Now, when it comes to pitching, there’s always innings to go around. We’ve got possibilities in the rotation right now. We’ve got possibilities in the bullpen. Nate Karns is someone that we view, in particular, as a huge talent upside for a number of reasons. Obviously, there is some injury risk with him. He didn’t pitch at all last year. Even the year prior he was banged up. But we waited and we looked at the value and the upside with his talent, and, just looking at things in total, we felt it was a worthwhile risk to take. And, if everything works out, he’s under control the following year as well. So, we think it makes sense for us for a lot of reasons. But I don’t anticipate any kind of free-agent signing frenzy here at the end. We’ve got to keep our eyes on the guys that we have in the organization and getting them better.

So, you anticipate any future signings to be of the minor-league variety?

I think it’s more likely minor leagues unless something changes. We want to get a mix in spring training that we feel like we’ve got a good group to compete for each position. I think as you’ve seen from some of our activities this winter, we’ve tried to make some minor moves in terms of improving our defensive options and adding some versatility on the roster. We’re certainly keeping our eyes opened and are assessing anything that becomes available, but at this point, I can’t say that something’s definitely going to happen.

 

When asked about Brady’s role, Mike talks about his value with team nutrition and strength and training.

Quote
USATSI_10228207-1024x682.jpg
Brady Anderson will be heavily involved in the Orioles’ nutritional program moving forward. (Michael Owens / USA Today)

Now that you have had some time with club vice president Brady Anderson, the highest-profile holdover from the previous regime, do you have a better sense of what you want his role and specific duties to be?

Brady has been involved in a lot of things here over the years, but he’s particularly been a driving force behind the nutritional programs and the strength and conditioning programs here, which have vastly improved under his watch. So, his involvement there is something I’m leaning on a lot. We haven’t been in camp yet, and so we’ll see how things evolve and progress going forward. But he’s been keeping up his work in the training space very heavily.

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bradysburns said:

Kind of a sad statement on prior ownership/regime priorities... to put it mildly. 

Really, it's almost scandalous that a team like the Orioles would be so poorly established in DR. 

 But Elias give me hope! 

The real sad thing is it probably costs next to nothing to set up a decent facility in the Dominican Republic.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From MLB.com article from 2015:

According to Rafael Pérez, MLB director of Dominican operations, in the past 10 years 15 academies have been built at an average cost of $4 million each. The more modern and luxurious academies have cost $6 million to $8.5 million, a large sum compared to the $785,000 it cost to build Campo Las Palmas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will anger some folks, but I wouldn’t say it’s unexpected 

Quote

We are sitting on a large pile of international (slot) pool money. As I’ve said, I don’t expect us to spend it all or even close to all of it (by June), but we are looking for every opportunity to do so and do so in a wise way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

This will anger some folks, but I wouldn’t say it’s unexpected 

 

 

Meanwhile the Marlins have said they are trying to get as much additional slot money as possible.  When you are so badly outspent by the Marlins you know something is wrong.  I think Elias isn't allowed to spend the money by ownership. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, atomic said:

Meanwhile the Marlins have said they are trying to get as much additional slot money as possible.  When you are so badly outspent by the Marlins you know something is wrong.  I think Elias isn't allowed to spend the money by ownership. 

If that's true, why spend the time and money to upgrade the facilities, hire Koby, spend time in the DR himself? 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, interloper said:

If that's true, why spend the time and money to upgrade the facilities, hire Koby, spend time in the DR himself? 

They haven't spent money to upgrade the facilities. They are talking nickle and dime stuff and they still will have the worst facility in DR in baseball. If they announce they are spending 5 million dollars plus on a new facility that is spending. Installing trackman to the worst facility in baseball? Give me a freaking break.  That is $30,000.  

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Sorry. Stepped away for a few hours and just saw this response. Just to be clear, I was specifically thinking of a pitcher more valuable than Cease. I do not think you give up 3 top 100 prospects (excluding our top 3) for Cease. I think it could take that plus more for a legit guy with more control.  Exactly my point. Not sure I worded it perfectly in my original post a few pages ago.
    • Those same people would be upset if we had traded for Robert Stephenson during last season.  However, they'd be thrilled if we gave Stephenson 3/39.   The dream online team is to have an all home grown group of position players headlined by a pitching staff of Justin Verlander and Max Scherzer for next year.  Maybe people would be upset if we couldn't pull off a Beavers/Norby trade for Spencer Strider.  
    • Orioles to open 2024 season at Oriole Park, introduce tweaks to home game start times - CBS Baltimore (cbsnews.com) This is just dumb. Some of us actually enjoy a Saturday evening out at a local sports bar or watching from home on a Saturday night. I get pushing them up pre Memorial day because of the cold, but mid summer? Just dumb all around.
    • Despite being a great pitcher, Nola had a bad ERA this year. I’m guessing the Orioles were only interested in the slim chance that he was going to end up with a below market deal with the Orioles being an attractive rebound destination given the wall and a competitive team.  I’d be floored if the Orioles were in on Nola at anywhere near what he got, but I suppose it’s positive they were at least doing their due diligence.
    • Of course people didn’t think he would. The stupidity of all of these arguments are these people who think it’s some ridiculous thought that people think guys who have been complete failures for their career are not worthy of signing and that the team should be aiming higher.       
    • No, I don’t think they were. 
    • Wait, don't drag me into your fight. I remember not being thrilled with the O'Hearn signing because I thought the cost of a guy who was going to be AAA depth at #1.3 million was unnecessary. I do also remember saying that he did have some analytics that suggested he'll be better without the shift. Let's remember though, I thought Stowers was going to be a semi-regular between RF/LF/DH and not buried like they did early in the season last year.  I don't remember anyone thinking O'Hearn was going to have the year he ended up having. Now I was probably the biggest voice against the Frazier signing and I was right. That signing never made sense for the dollar amount and the players already on hand. But this is a Uwasawa thread. Back to that.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...