Jump to content

Chris Davis 2019 and beyond


Camden_yardbird

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, weams said:

Is he? I'm uncertain that he is giving the full effort that he gave to baseball during the time that he "earned" that contract. 

Just trying to temper the urge to start referring to him personally as a train wreck, dumpster fire and all the other names we both know are beginning to become commonplace.

I'm beyond frustrated watching him come to the plate game after game.  If what you believe turns out to be even a little true, you won't hear another word out of me in his defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 minutes ago, 24fps said:

Just trying to temper the urge to start referring to him personally as a train wreck, dumpster fire and all the other names we both know are beginning to become commonplace.

I'm beyond frustrated watching him come to the plate game after game.  If what you believe turns out to be even a little true, you won't hear another word out of me in his defense.

Very good points. All commendable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Natty said:

So the team wants to let the new young guys play...Except Davis keeps being in the lineup, for what? If the answer is money, that's pitiful. 

I think they're giving him every opportunity to prove he still deserves a place in the lineup and will continue to do so for the rest of the season.  If he continues to be this bad, then I think it's very possible they cut him sometime next season if not during the offseason.  

So if that's the case, yeah the answer is money, but not in the sense I think you mean it.  CD gets paid regardless.  Ownership wants to know if there's any alternative to writing off that large a sum of money.  Understandable.  It's a LOT of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 24fps said:

Just trying to temper the urge to start referring to him personally as a train wreck, dumpster fire and all the other names we both know are beginning to become commonplace.

I'm beyond frustrated watching him come to the plate game after game.  If what you believe turns out to be even a little true, you won't hear another word out of me in his defense.

I agree. I was brash about calling people out on this stuff before. You put it much better than I. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just think he should retire.  Work out a deal with the Orioles to get some percentage of the salary owed until the end of the contract in exchange for him walking away early.  I'm not advocating for Bobby Bonilla ridiculousness but if the Orioles can piss away 3 million for Tillman this year and another 3 million for Colby Rasmus, they can give Davis something similar to NOT play until the contract is over or something.  

Now there's no incentive for him to do that, obviously he's going to be interested in getting the full amount of that contract.  But I just can't imagine being so terrible at my job, I'm hoping personal pride gets in the way somehow.  If I was that bad at my job and was well aware of it and my company gave me a large sum of money to just not come back for 3 or 4 years, I'd be inclined to listen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 24fps said:

I think they're giving him every opportunity to prove he still deserves a place in the lineup and will continue to do so for the rest of the season.  If he continues to be this bad, then I think it's very possible they cut him sometime next season if not during the offseason.  

So if that's the case, yeah the answer is money, but not in the sense I think you mean it.  CD gets paid regardless.  Ownership wants to know if there's any alternative to writing off that large a sum of money.  Understandable.  It's a LOT of money.

I also think that once rosters expand, we'll see less Davis and more Mancini at 1B while the try out some younger outfielders.  I'm 100% positive that they will expect him to be better in 2019 (because how could he be worse), and won't cut him unless he actually is worse than this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Now there's no incentive for him to do that, obviously he's going to be interested in getting the full amount of that contract.  But I just can't imagine being so terrible at my job, I'm hoping personal pride gets in the way somehow.

Only chance I could kinda sorta see that working is if your buyout offer is so high, like 80% of his remaining salary, that it almost forces him to stop humiliating himself. When you factor in taxes and fees, that's barely over 10 million that he'd be "losing." Does he really want to be a laughingstock for the next four years over that amount?

If he won't budge, would call Miami and tell them we'll take Chen and Prado for Davis and whatever cash difference. Throw in a prospect you're not sold on if need be.

Both of these scenarios are probably long shots though. Hire a new hitting coach. See if anything changes going into next season. If it's more of the same, will just need to bite the bullet at that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Finisher said:

Only chance I could kinda sorta see that working is if your buyout offer is so high, like 80% of his remaining salary, that it almost forces him to stop humiliating himself. 

 

If he would take 80% of his salary, the O's would have already done it. THink about it - they owe him  $17M per year for the next 4 years, then $42M in deferred money after that.  That's $110M - If they agreed to an 80% buyout, the O's would save $22M.  A no brainer.  That's more than half of what they saved buy trading away their best players.

The big question is would Davis do it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Settlement: Between the 4 years at 17 mil and the 15 years of deferred money at a total payout of 42 mil, he is owed  $110  mil over a combined 19 years. I do not think he and or Scott Boras will allow he to take less.

Offer: 110 mil by 19 yrs = 5.789 mil per yr for 19 years. 

           As a bonus I would offer 5.8 mil a yr. It would give him a xtra 

           200.000 over 19 yrs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Richmond Bird 9 said:

Settlement: Between the 4 years at 17 mil and the 15 years of deferred money at a total payout of 42 mil, he is owed  $110  mil over a combined 19 years. I do not think he and or Scott Boras will allow he to take less.

Offer: 110 mil by 19 yrs = 5.789 mil per yr for 19 years. 

           As a bonus I would offer 5.8 mil a yr. It would give him a xtra 

           200.000 over 19 yrs.

 

Boras isn't the boss, Boras is the employee.

He only has what power the player gives him.

Why is this so hard to understand?

Agents work for the player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Boras isn't the boss, Boras is the employee.

He only has what power the player gives him.

Why is this so hard to understand?

Agents work for the player.

Has Boras already been paid his commission in full, or does he get paid as Davis gets paid?  If it's the latter, then Boras has a say although Davis theoretically could just write him a check to make him whole then tell him to go away.

Sports agents as malevolent and dictatorial makes for better fiction and it seems that the message is now taken more seriously in the real world than it should.  In fairness, Boras doesn't let too many opportunities to reinforce that notion pass by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Per Roch:   For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Jordan Westburg 2B Anthony Santander RF Colton Cowser LF Adley Rutschman C Ryan O’Hearn DH Ryan Mountcastle 1B Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Cade Povich LHP For the Twins Manuel Margot RF Carlos Correa SS Byron Buxton CF Carlos Santana 1B Royce Lewis 3B Kyle Farmer 2B Ryan Jeffers DH Christian Vázquez C Willi Castro LF Pablo López RHP    
    • That would be pretty cool. Just do me a favor and please don't start the magic number thread in June next season.
    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...