Jump to content

Game 2 lineup. What do you think?


Natty

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Roy Firestone said:

I get it, and you're not wrong. Im just saying I'd like to see the best prospects up soon..this team is colorless and punchless....I can't even watch this pummeling every night and day.

Hey I get it, too. This season is going to be ugly. But part of the plan is retaining control of our best prospects. I would much rather have an extra year of Hays and Diaz than push them up early when they don't even have the best minor league resumes and the games are basically meaningless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, Roy Firestone said:

I get it, and you're not wrong. Im just saying I'd like to see the best prospects up soon..this team is colorless and punchless....I can't even watch this pummeling every night and day.

And as long as you come on here and say things like that you can't expect anyone to bid on a Trey Mancini jersey. Trey is in the lineup today. Since you don't think this lineup is worth watching, you must not think he is worth watching. But you wonder why no one has bid on his jersey. You can't hammer the team mercilessly and relentlessly in one stroke and successfully auction off its memorabilia in another. You could be saying, "That's not an impressive lineup, but with Trey in there anything could happen." It might not reflect your feelings, but it is true, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LTO's said:

I had fun watching them on Thursday. I knew they were going to lose mostly because the team they were playing might win 110 games this year but they did some nice things. Defense was solid, Smith Jr. and Mancini put a charge into some balls and Hess' stuff looks like it'll play up from the pen. It's game two on the road against the best team in the AL people. They'd lose this series with an 80 win roster. Bring something new to the table besides "this team stinks." It's as boring and lazy a take as it is obvious.

Exactly. It's like watching your kid's little league game. (Hopefully) it's not all about winning. Baseball can just be fun to watch. As bad as the O's are, they are still in the top .001% of human beings at what they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Roy Firestone said:

With respect. I have an opinion as do you. I have no obligation to be nice. Or mean.Its just MY opinion,and I'm not in the PR business.Thank you.

 With respect? How about originality, Roy? There’s plenty of posters here who are negative day in and day out. You’ve never seemed like one of them, but lately it’s a lot of “the team isn’t interesting” or “it’s pointless”, etc. 

 Sure, you have a right to an opinion like everybody else, just try to mix it up every now and then.

?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

And as long as you come on here and say things like that you can't expect anyone to bid on a Trey Mancini jersey. Trey is in the lineup today. Since you don't think this lineup is worth watching, you must not think he is worth watching. But you wonder why no one has bid on his jersey. You can't hammer the team mercilessly and relentlessly in one stroke and successfully auction off its memorabilia in another. You could be saying, "That's not an impressive lineup, but with Trey in there anything could happen." It might not reflect your feelings, but it is true, right?

I think Trey at first is the best position for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Roy Firestone said:

The lack of civility and respect here is stunning to me. I won't be around here if it continues.You folks don't need me.I don't need this either.Ill decide when/if I continue.

I hope you stick around. This season is bringing out the worst of everyone. I do hope the more clean it up, as I have had to put some people on ignore so that I am not tempted to engage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, LTO's said:

I had fun watching them on Thursday. I knew they were going to lose mostly because the team they were playing might win 110 games this year but they did some nice things. Defense was solid, Smith Jr. and Mancini put a charge into some balls and Hess' stuff looks like it'll play up from the pen. It's game two on the road against the best team in the AL people. They'd lose this series with an 80 win roster. Bring something new to the table besides "this team stinks." It's as boring and lazy a take as it is obvious.

No it's not! It's the Red Sox.

 

No it's the Yankees!

 

Red Sox!!!

 

Yankees!!!!111

 

Shut up you're stupid!

 

Eat ....

 

 

 

 

 

They're BOTH REALLY good! We'll probably lose 30 games this year against the 2. Just the way it is this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...