Jump to content

Grayson Rodriguez 2019


WalkWithElias

Recommended Posts

I was going through notes on Rodriguez and found this interesting. Rodriguez doesn’t have elite upside but has chance at mid rotation type pitcher.  How does a 6”5 kid that throws 95 and four pitches not have elite upside?  If he was 6”2 and thorowing 93 that one thing.  He could add another two mph with building a more solid frame then he has now easily.

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, bpilktree said:

I was going through notes on Rodriguez and found this interesting. Rodriguez doesn’t have elite upside but has chance at mid rotation type pitcher.  How does a 6”5 kid that throws 95 and four pitches not have elite upside?  If he was 6”2 and thorowing 93 that one thing.  He could add another two mph with building a more solid frame then he has now easily.

 

Maybe they meant like a John Smoltz/Dave McNally/ Tim Hudson type mid-rotation starter? ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/20/2019 at 10:16 PM, bpilktree said:

I was going through notes on Rodriguez and found this interesting. Rodriguez doesn’t have elite upside but has chance at mid rotation type pitcher.  How does a 6”5 kid that throws 95 and four pitches not have elite upside?  If he was 6”2 and thorowing 93 that one thing.  He could add another two mph with building a more solid frame then he has now easily.

 

Where are you reading that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like putting tags on recent draft picks of future no. 1, mid rotation, back end starter, etc. is fairly worthless. 

Way too much can happen from point A to point Z and way too many prospects with the TOR stuff never reach their potential or even end up in the bullpen.  

I don't see any reason why Rodriguez couldn't be a future no. 1 if everything broke right, but he's just as likely to settle into a middle or back rotation starter.  Or injuries could derail him completely.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ChuckS said:

I feel like putting tags on recent draft picks of future no. 1, mid rotation, back end starter, etc. is fairly worthless. 

Way too much can happen from point A to point Z and way too many prospects with the TOR stuff never reach their potential or even end up in the bullpen.  

I don't see any reason why Rodriguez couldn't be a future no. 1 if everything broke right, but he's just as likely to settle into a middle or back rotation starter.  Or injuries could derail him completely.  

There is a wide spectrum of outcomes for every prospect, I don’t think that makes evaluating a player and projecting a reasonable set of possible outcomes without value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/20/2019 at 12:11 PM, owknows said:

That change is filthy... 15-17 mph off the fastball and no discernible  difference in arm speed.

From those videos and from watching his first start on video (not the best camera angle), his changeup is his best off speed pitch right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

From those videos and from watching his first start on video (not the best camera angle), his changeup is his best off speed pitch right now.

What's the best camera angle for viewing pitchers? Just curious. I find it really hard to see what type of movement pitches have from these videos from the side of the plate that these scouts take. For me, the camera angles shown for broadcasts when a pitch is thrown are ideal. I wonder if teams have access to cameras from that angle even if the minor league team doesn't broadcast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Spl51 said:

What's the best camera angle for viewing pitchers? Just curious. I find it really hard to see what type of movement pitches have from these videos from the side of the plate that these scouts take. For me, the camera angles shown for broadcasts when a pitch is thrown are ideal. I wonder if teams have access to cameras from that angle even if the minor league team doesn't broadcast.

I think a nice centerfield angle is the easiest to tell. Some site one time showed which MLB parks had the best viewing angle for judging pitches.

Also, sitting behind home plate is decent, though the catcher and umpire block where the ball is received sometimes.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • HEY YANKEES! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnxNRPy_SOA
    • Yeah I'm all for sportsmanship but seeing 'Congratulations Yankees' at or near the top of the board is sickening, not gonna lie.  There is no high road when it comes to these clowns.  Boone's constant whining, the well-documented HP ump favoritism (I don't care if its framing or whatever, its happening, and its annoying AF), the whining about Judge getting hit on the hand while their guys constantly pitch inside including of course the Kjerstad play where they were literally cutting up on the bench as he lay prone on home plate, the ginormous payroll, the incredibly entitled fan base booing at pitches being called balls that are three inches off the plate, that stupid roll call, that stupid whistle after strikeouts, the stupid national media drooling over a Judge v Ohtani WS possibility, Nestor Cortes and his dumb mustache, the mediocre stadium that is revered simply because its called Yankee Stadium, the ridiculously short RF porch, the Soto Shuffle or whatever the hell it is. Congratulations my ass.  Screw those dudes.
    • Here's the deal. I doubt anyone on the Yankee's board congradulated us last year. This year they won the East. Whippie for them. It's like saying the IRS won tax season. IF, we do anything in the playoffs, we may meet again. But there are some significant hurdles before that. And they could easily lose along the way. Cleveland, Houston, Detroit, and KC are no walk in the park. I'll root for the O's to go as far as they can and that the Yankees are one and done. We are in. I hope we win one more so we play the opening round in Oriole Park. If not, we are still in and have to do what we got to do to go anywhere. Two years in a row. While the Red Sox, Blue Jays, and Tampa sleep. Year two with a heck of a lot more obstacles. This may not be a WS year but we are competitive, young, and a hell of a lot classier than that bunch in the Bronx. 
    • The usage of Cano last night was poor, I don't even blame him really.  Yankees had 9-1-2 coming up, and Torres is well known (based on the telecast) to hit Cano well, and hit sinkers well.  He laced that hit to RF off him on Tuesday where the Yanks screwed up the baserunning.  And Soto got a hit off him that same inning.  So it was pretty predictable that these guys were going to tee off when he came in, and that's exactly what happened. Not to mention he's pitched a lot recently, and Burnes should have pitched another inning anyway.  Just baffling decisions by Hyde last night, and I'm not one to generally question those types of things.  Even if the Burnes thing was pre-ordained, the choice of Cano for that moment was terrible.
    • Why is this thread on the Oriole Talk section.    It probably does not belong on the OriolesHangout  at all but if it stays it should be on the MLB section.
    • If there's two outs and its not Judge in the hole, I'm probably going with Perez, crossing my fingers he gets the lefty, and then starting fresh the next inning with Coulombe or someone else.  If there's one out, I'm going w/ Coulombe.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...