Jump to content

DL Hall 2019


weams

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’d argue that Bedard panned out.   Thankfully MacPhail had the foresight to trade him at peak value, because I wouldn’t view him the same way if he’d stayed with us and spent half his time on the IL the next few years.    

Bedard got us Jones and Tillman, so I can see the case. I’m hoping from much more production from Hall than Bedard ever provided though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious for opinions on the wisdom of cultivating two breaking balls together.  Obviously it's fantastic if he can master both, but if command really is the last piece of the puzzle, that seems like a bigger priority than a backup breaker.  I guess if there's only so many pitches to throw hot each week, is there enough time to practice hitting all four quadrants (or missing where you want for chases) with your three main pitches and grow a 4th pitch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LookinUp said:

To put it another way, the O’s will need Mike Mussina types to be perennial contenders. Bedard was never on that level. He was closer to a flash in the pan. We need a horse.

I can’t argue with this.    What we need is someone with Bedard’s talent and Guthrie’s durability.    

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OrioleDog said:

I'm curious for opinions on the wisdom of cultivating two breaking balls together.  Obviously it's fantastic if he can master both, but if command really is the last piece of the puzzle, that seems like a bigger priority than a backup breaker.  I guess if there's only so many pitches to throw hot each week, is there enough time to practice hitting all four quadrants (or missing where you want for chases) with your three main pitches and grow a 4th pitch?

Fair question, but I’m OK letting him work on all four and cutting it back later if necessary.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Fair question, but I’m OK letting him work on all four and cutting it back later if necessary.  

I would also add for many pitchers this is a time when you figure out if your breaking ball is a curve or a slider.  Some of the slider scrutiny here is that I've heard such glowing things about his curve that I imagined he already had that question answered.

I know Paxton and Snell were comps, also wonder how guys more in the scouting know would compare/contrast him with Max Fried, another emerging lefty.  A quick survey of their repertoires - Savant has

Fried - 60% fast, 28% curve, 8% slide (only 3% change)

Snell - 43% fast, 32% curve, 17% change (only 7% slide)

Paxton - 64% fast, 24% cutter, 12% curve - I guess I see Paxton is a LaLoosh-ian lightning in his arm guy who can't spin the ball very well (heaven help hitters if he could).  I'm surely oversimplifying but somewhat when I see cutter as a guy's 2nd pitch, it says all power, no finesse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/27/2019 at 9:55 AM, Frobby said:

I’d argue that Bedard panned out.   Thankfully MacPhail had the foresight to trade him at peak value, because I wouldn’t view him the same way if he’d stayed with us and spent half his time on the IL the next few years.    

If Hall turns out good as Bedard we should be pleased. 10.6 WAr over 3 seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/27/2019 at 10:10 AM, LookinUp said:

Bedard got us Jones and Tillman, so I can see the case. I’m hoping from much more production from Hall than Bedard ever provided though.

He is in low A ball. I think you need to have more realistic expectations of what you consider  to be successful from him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MASNPalmer said:

FYI, High A ball (Frederick) where he has 23 Ks in 15 IP and is 3+ years younger than average competition. 

Dylan Buddy and Hunter Harvey were great at that stage too.  If he gets 17 career WAR like Ballard we should be very happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, atomic said:

He is in low A ball. I think you need to have more realistic expectations of what you consider  to be successful from him.  

It’s not a matter of expectations, it’s a matter of hopes and needs.   Bedard essentially had two really good seasons.   Those are the only two seasons where he pitched enough innings to qualify.  We need to develop a pitcher who gives us more than that, whether it’s Hall or someone else.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Frobby said:

It’s not a matter of expectations, it’s a matter of hopes and needs.   Bedard essentially had two really good seasons.   Those are the only two seasons where he pitched enough innings to qualify.  We need to develop a pitcher who gives us more than that, whether it’s Hall or someone else.   

You can win championships without a player in Mike Mussina caliber.  He has over 80 career WAR and is Hall of Famer.  To hope anyone to achieve that will lead to great disappointment. I would be overjoyed if anyone ends up being the next Cuellar or Flanagan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, atomic said:

You can win championships without a player in Mike Mussina caliber.  He has over 80 career WAR and is Hall of Famer.  To hope anyone to achieve that will lead to great disappointment. I would be overjoyed if anyone ends up being the next Cuellar or Flanagan. 

I  think you are confusing the words "hope" and "expectation".  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, atomic said:

You can win championships without a player in Mike Mussina caliber.  He has over 80 career WAR and is Hall of Famer.  To hope anyone to achieve that will lead to great disappointment. I would be overjoyed if anyone ends up being the next Cuellar or Flanagan. 

I don’t disagree.    When was the last time we had a 100-win pitcher?    Mussina, who won a helluva lot more than 100.    Cuellar and Flanagan both did.   

Point is, we need to develop a few solid starting pitchers.    One Bedard wouldn’t be enough.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I’m guessing it’s #3. I was a bit worried about #4, but if that was the case, don’t think that Suarez would be pitching today. 
    • Are you OK with context independent batting inputs that are used in WAR?  It feels like pitching and hitting should be symmetrical in terms of how they factor in sequencing.   FRV is definitely better than DRS for outfielders, as @tangotiger convincingly argues here.  For infielders, it’s more debatable, especially 1B where only DRS accounts for picks. By the way, Fangraphs WAR leaderboard allows you to toggle between FIP, RA9, and a 50/50 mix.  Cowser beats Gil regardless of the approach.
    • Hm, seems like perfect situation for Akin as an opener, maybe game 3 if necessary? 
    • You are such a Rebel.
    • Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...