Jump to content

Rough start for Chance Sisco


ChuckS

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 190
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, Ballmer Bruce said:

Any chance of him going to second base as Biggio did with Astros.  Sisco was high school shortstop.

He has slow foot speed which typically is consistent with slow feet. I'm not saying I wouldn't look at him at 3B or 2B, but he may not have the quickness you want at 2B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

He has slow foot speed which typically is consistent with slow feet. I'm not saying I wouldn't look at him at 3B or 2B, but he may not have the quickness you want at 2B.

How does foot speed equate to sprint speed? Same thing, or does foot speed define what a player typically needs to do in the field as opposed to running down the line as fast as you can?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, theocean said:

How does foot speed equate to sprint speed? Same thing, or does foot speed define what a player typically needs to do in the field as opposed to running down the line as fast as you can?

Spring speed is defined with statcast and is a great tool to determine how fast a guy can run at max speed. Foot speed is how quick can a player get moving from a dead stop. Soe guys are fast when on the move, but takes them awhile to get moving. Typically your best foot speed infielders will be your SS and 2B since they have to cover the most ground. 

Foot speed can also be synonymous with first step quickness.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/21/2019 at 2:52 PM, UpstateNYfan said:

Maybe, but it seems like a small sample size to make such a conclusion.

One player's stats are a small sample size.  An entire league's stats are an enormous sample size by this time of the year.  And offense is way up in the IL this year.  

Last year, the highest team OPS in the IL was Indianapolis, at .753.  This year, ten teams in the IL currently have a higher OPS than .753, and the league leading team is over .850.    If I had more time I could compute a league-wide OPS but my guess is that it's up about .100 this year. 

This definitely affects how we should be looking at Sisco, Stewart and Mountcastle--they are all having good seasons, but not as good as if they were putting up the same numbers at Norfolk last season.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Brewers played Travis Shaw and Moose their i would think Sisco has atleast the foot speed of those two guys.   I keep thinking why not give him or Mountcastle some innings their and see what they can do.  It is not like we have much in prospects at 2nd except Branlon.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • There’s a good chance McCann starts game one with Burnes. Big roster. We can always move Adley from DH to C late in the game. Lose the DH, but have a big enough bench to just pinch hit and double switch to hide the pitcher’s spot coming up.  So really we’d only be sacrificing 2 ABs from O’Hearn/Mounty/Kjerstad but we get Burnes throwing to his boy every pitch. 
    • We would have lost last night regardless due to zero runs scored by the offense. It is worrisome that Cano looked awful in back to back games. After talk about arm soreness. He has been the one reliable guy. Once we fell behind I don't really care how bad Bowman and Baker are. Hopefully they don't even make the roster for the playoffs. 
    • Don’t sleep on Povich getting a chance to eliminate the team that traded him away. That kind of stuff matters. The little extra…
    • I do worry about the McCann start although he has been hitting lately, so maybe you can justify it.
    • It’s the 7th inning with Burnes or Eflin on the bump. A tough lefty is coming up. Who you bringing in?  Perez or Coloumbe?  
    • My thoughts: - I agree that the Achilles heel is the bullpen and not the offense (especially with Westburg, Mountcastle, Urias, and Kjerstad back). - I also agree that Perez is overused in high leverage situations. This is going to come down to the degree you expect his “clutch” performance to be predictive going forward.  - I second the notion that most good bullpens are built with some degree of dumpster diving.  If you go back to offseason threads, there were not many desired bullpen FA targets (outside of unrealistic ones like Hader) that would have worked out well.  Maybe we haven’t “dumpster dived” well enough as evidenced by the success of Kaleb Ort in Houston. - Jacob Webb hasn’t been sharp since returning from the IL and Bowman has looked shaky his last few times out. - We don’t have a true closer, only a group of mostly effective set-up men in Dominguez, Cano, and Coulombe. - Part of me wishes they would be more aggressive with G-Rod and the Mountain. While we expect the team to continue to contend, you never really know how many times you’ll be back in the playoffs. However, I know in my head they are probably making the right decision. - I also feel like they should be auditioning McDermot, Selby, Young, or Strowd (who has been very good since August after rough Norfolk start). They could option Baker who I think is unlikely to have a path to trusted status after last year’s ALDS performance. This feeling may be mostly driven by dissatisfaction with the current state and wanting something better.  It might be unrealistic to expect options unproven at the MLB level to suddenly step in and be key playoff pieces.
    • Oh if we’re talking about what they will do, I can see it being something stupid like McCann at C and Adley at DH. I do think Mullins has enough veteranosity to outweigh Hyde’s obsession with L/R matchups. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...