Jump to content

Blaine Knight 2019


LookinUp

Recommended Posts

Knight to Frederick and Baumann to Bowie by mid-May.  Arguments could be made that both should have started at those levels.  

The rest stay where they are for most or all of the season.  I don't see GrayRod getting a first half promotion unless he is just putting up nothing but goose eggs and double digit K performances.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply
25 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Age is one reason I've been hesitant to jump on the Blaine-wagon.  I like my prospects like Elvis liked his girls.

I think people are too in love with his SEC performance. If he sit 91-93 as a starter, he won't be one, the fastball is too hittable there and I don't think he has the level of command of his other pitches to get ahead without it. I think he's a solid prospect with a good chance to be a reliever of some value and there is a chance for as much as mid-rotation upside if he can hold mid 90s, command his offspeed better, improve the changeup. Those are pretty big ifs though, so people who are assuming that he's a future rotation staple are getting ahead of themselves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
42 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Knight had another outstanding game tonight:  5 IP, 2 H, 0 R, 0 BB, 8 K’s, in a tidy 74 pitches, 51 for strikes.    He’s not long for Delmarva, I don’t think.   

Agreed, he’s on the Lowther promotion track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As he should be. I get the questions about his future ML value. They certainly have merit. He needs to improve, but he has quality innings under his belt and is good enough now to compete at higher levels. I'd have him in AA, or A+ at a minimum, but I defer to smarter people about where it's best to work on the developmental stuff he's working on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Luke-OH changed the title to Blaine Knight 2019
On 4/17/2019 at 5:33 PM, Luke-OH said:

Someone on twitter said something about how old Ofelky Peralta was for Low A , I told him that Knight was almost a year older. 

That should not be a knock on Blaine, respectfully. Ofelky spent what, three years in high A Frederick? This is Blaine’s first full year. I get that 22 and 10 months is just a bit old for the Sally League, but his first full year in pro ball...so what. Let’s see where he is this time next year before we fault him for age. So far, looks like he has some stuff that plays well at higher levels...no?

Blaine never pitched in any summer ball before signing with the O’s; so the arm is comparatively fresh and he needs to get bigger and stronger,  build up his stamina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

That should not be a knock on Blaine, respectfully. Ofelky spent what, three years in high A Frederick? This is Blaine’s first full year. I get that 22 and 10 months is just a bit old for the Sally League, but his first full year in pro ball...so what. Let’s see where he is this time next year before we fault him for age. So far, looks like he has some stuff that plays well at higher levels...no?

Blaine never pitched in any summer ball before signing with the O’s; so the arm is comparatively fresh and he needs to get bigger and stronger,  build up his stamina.

I think putting Knight in Delmarva to start the year was a conservative placement, but he will move to Frederick before the end of May.    Hopefully he does well there and is slated for Bowie next spring.     He was older than average when drafted, but that doesn’t mean we can rush him.     

I’d like to see Peralta back in Frederick too before too long.    But obviously there would need to be moves made to make room for both Knight and Peralta, so it’s not that simple.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think putting Knight in Delmarva to start the year was a conservative placement, but he will move to Frederick before the end of May.    Hopefully he does well there and is slated for Bowie next spring.     He was older than average when drafted, but that doesn’t mean we can rush him.     

I’d like to see Peralta back in Frederick too before too long.    But obviously there would need to be moves made to make room for both Knight and Peralta, so it’s not that simple.   

He was 21 when drafted, and turned 22 three weeks later. I agree with what you wrote, I just do not see age as a factor at this point. Relatively speaking, he is a little behind stamina wise. I think slowing his progression in the beginning is smart. I think he may end the year in AA. Perhaps starts at Bowie in 2020 at the age of 23, and then we’ll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Jammer7 said:

That should not be a knock on Blaine, respectfully. Ofelky spent what, three years in high A Frederick? This is Blaine’s first full year. I get that 22 and 10 months is just a bit old for the Sally League, but his first full year in pro ball...so what. Let’s see where he is this time next year before we fault him for age. So far, looks like he has some stuff that plays well at higher levels...no?

Blaine never pitched in any summer ball before signing with the O’s; so the arm is comparatively fresh and he needs to get bigger and stronger,  build up his stamina.

I didn't mean it as such, it was more pointed towards the bias people tend to have against prospects who have failed at a level. It was about Peralta still having promise, not Knight being old for the level. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Jammer7 said:

He was 21 when drafted, and turned 22 three weeks later. I agree with what you wrote, I just do not see age as a factor at this point. Relatively speaking, he is a little behind stamina wise. I think slowing his progression in the beginning is smart. I think he may end the year in AA. Perhaps starts at Bowie in 2020 at the age of 23, and then we’ll see.

Just curious, why do you say he’s a little behind stamina wise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/28/2019 at 7:58 AM, Frobby said:

Just curious, why do you say he’s a little behind stamina wise?

Because he has never pitched through a summer. He pitched the college seasons and that was it. He never played travel ball. His dad would not allow it. Saved his arm, and I like it. Just needs to go through the long grind of a season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/28/2019 at 12:15 AM, Luke-OH said:

I didn't mean it as such, it was more pointed towards the bias people tend to have against prospects who have failed at a level. It was about Peralta still having promise, not Knight being old for the level. 

I gotcha. I guess what I am trying to say, overall, is that I love that Blaine has not pitched year round. He is not the typical pitching prospect these days. I hope he succeeds, and perhaps more kids will pitch less throughout the years. Save the arms, push back all the TJ surgeries. I have seen so much abuse over the years, and it’s heartbreaking. All for what, win some meaningless tournament? Light up a radar gun at 15-16? Silly, and it hurts the game overall. But companies like PG, and so on, make a ton of money off these kids’ urgency. 

I really like this kid’s chances. I hope for many more like him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting nugget re: travel ball. I can see several pro's and con's of playing it for a pitcher, particularly year round. In MD, even most travel teams get decent breaks. My son's travel coach is really cognizant of wear and tear. They don't play too many games. They do play multiple sports and he's very careful about over-taxing their arms. Hopefully that's becoming the norm.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I’m guessing it’s #3. I was a bit worried about #4, but if that was the case, don’t think that Suarez would be pitching today. 
    • Are you OK with context independent batting inputs that are used in WAR?  It feels like pitching and hitting should be symmetrical in terms of how they factor in sequencing.   FRV is definitely better than DRS for outfielders, as @tangotiger convincingly argues here.  For infielders, it’s more debatable, especially 1B where only DRS accounts for picks. By the way, Fangraphs WAR leaderboard allows you to toggle between FIP, RA9, and a 50/50 mix.  Cowser beats Gil regardless of the approach.
    • Hm, seems like perfect situation for Akin as an opener, maybe game 3 if necessary? 
    • You are such a Rebel.
    • Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...