Jump to content

Trade value 2019


HowAboutThat

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Yeah, but SSS for all concerned, especially Cobb who has only made two starts, one of which was very solid (5.2 IP, 2 R).    

Absolutely true. 

We're 1 month into a 5 month window to build trade value. Plenty of time for all of this to change. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the lesson of Alex Cobb's two Aprils is that if he is out of sync, even below average MLB offenses will light him up like a pinball machine, but he can still be a fine pitcher when he gets going.  Hopefully he can have his August 2018-type run early enough for it to really help us this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I thought only WC would call 5.2, 2R very solid.

I would take that from any of our starters every time.   Do that 32 times and it’s 180 innings at 3.17 ERA.  That’s not just good on the Orioles, that’s something any team in MLB would covet.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I would take that from any of our starters every time.   Do that 32 times and it’s 180 innings at 3.17 ERA.  That’s not just good on the Orioles, that’s something any team in MLB would covet.   

I wish MLB hadn’t come to this. It used to be a pitcher who could only go 5.2 would be your fifth starter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I wish MLB hadn’t come to this. It used to be a pitcher who could only go 5.2 would be your fifth starter. 

It is what it is.   I count 37 pitchers who made 30 starts and averaged 5.2 IP/start or better last season.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Well, I just read the transcript for the chat at MLB trade rumors, and one of the questions was about whether Edwin Encarnacion of the Mariners has any trade value, and the answer was, “ha ha ha ha no“

That means that Mancini probably doesn’t have much trade value as a first base man, But he might have some as an outfielder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade Value of any player has to do with SUPPLY and DEMAND.   When three or four teams are in need of a particular type player and there is only one or two available, the price is way higher than if three or four players of equal value are being sought by one team the buyer can name the terms.

 

Having said that, where does Mancini fall within the confines of available players with the same skill set and years of control???  Also who is looking for that type of player???

As fans, we seem to set a higher value on your own players.  BIG MISTAKE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Philip said:

 Well, I just read the transcript for the chat at MLB trade rumors, and one of the questions was about whether Edwin Encarnacion of the Mariners has any trade value, and the answer was, “ha ha ha ha no“

That means that Mancini probably doesn’t have much trade value as a first base man, But he might have some as an outfielder. 

Encarnacion is making $21.7 mm this year and whatever team has him at the end of the year is on the hook for a $5 mm buyout of his $20 mm option for next year.   Mancini is under team control at relatively cheap prices this year and the next three.    That’s a huge factor in their trade value.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Encarnacion is making $21.7 mm this year and whatever team has him at the end of the year is on the hook for a $5 mm buyout of his $20 mm option for next year.   Mancini is under team control at relatively cheap prices this year and the next three.    That’s a huge factor in their trade value.  

One has already hit their ceiling while the other may have plenty of improvement remaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, thezeroes said:

One has already hit their ceiling while the other may have plenty of improvement remaining.

“May” being the operative wording.   

Hyde, ever on the sunny side, has said a couple of times that he thinks Trey is “just scratching the surface” of what he can do.    Let’s hope so!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • There’s a good chance McCann starts game one with Burnes. Big roster. We can always move Adley from DH to C late in the game. Lose the DH, but have a big enough bench to just pinch hit and double switch to hide the pitcher’s spot coming up.  So really we’d only be sacrificing 2 ABs from O’Hearn/Mounty/Kjerstad but we get Burnes throwing to his boy every pitch. 
    • We would have lost last night regardless due to zero runs scored by the offense. It is worrisome that Cano looked awful in back to back games. After talk about arm soreness. He has been the one reliable guy. Once we fell behind I don't really care how bad Bowman and Baker are. Hopefully they don't even make the roster for the playoffs. 
    • Don’t sleep on Povich getting a chance to eliminate the team that traded him away. That kind of stuff matters. The little extra…
    • I do worry about the McCann start although he has been hitting lately, so maybe you can justify it.
    • It’s the 7th inning with Burnes or Eflin on the bump. A tough lefty is coming up. Who you bringing in?  Perez or Coloumbe?  
    • My thoughts: - I agree that the Achilles heel is the bullpen and not the offense (especially with Westburg, Mountcastle, Urias, and Kjerstad back). - I also agree that Perez is overused in high leverage situations. This is going to come down to the degree you expect his “clutch” performance to be predictive going forward.  - I second the notion that most good bullpens are built with some degree of dumpster diving.  If you go back to offseason threads, there were not many desired bullpen FA targets (outside of unrealistic ones like Hader) that would have worked out well.  Maybe we haven’t “dumpster dived” well enough as evidenced by the success of Kaleb Ort in Houston. - Jacob Webb hasn’t been sharp since returning from the IL and Bowman has looked shaky his last few times out. - We don’t have a true closer, only a group of mostly effective set-up men in Dominguez, Cano, and Coulombe. - Part of me wishes they would be more aggressive with G-Rod and the Mountain. While we expect the team to continue to contend, you never really know how many times you’ll be back in the playoffs. However, I know in my head they are probably making the right decision. - I also feel like they should be auditioning McDermot, Selby, Young, or Strowd (who has been very good since August after rough Norfolk start). They could option Baker who I think is unlikely to have a path to trusted status after last year’s ALDS performance. This feeling may be mostly driven by dissatisfaction with the current state and wanting something better.  It might be unrealistic to expect options unproven at the MLB level to suddenly step in and be key playoff pieces.
    • Oh if we’re talking about what they will do, I can see it being something stupid like McCann at C and Adley at DH. I do think Mullins has enough veteranosity to outweigh Hyde’s obsession with L/R matchups. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...