Jump to content

Has Barry Zito's Contract Had Any Effect on the Current Free Agent Market?

Sanfran327

By Sanfran327
in MLB

Has Barry Zito's Contract Had Any Effect on the Current Free Agent Market?  

15 members have voted

  1. 1. Has Barry Zito's Contract Had Any Effect on the Current Free Agent Market?

    • Yes
      9
    • No
      6

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Lucky Jim Hangout Grand Counsel

Lucky Jim

Posted
Posted

I'm not sure "any effect" is the right phrasing - it probably had SOME (i.e., any offer that comes after Zito with Zito-like factors isn't coming out of the blue - the familiar is always more palatable than the unfamiliar.)

I'm going to answer No, with the qualification that I don't think it's true it had "no" effect, but that the effect was minimal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Moose Milligan Hangout Grand Counsel

Moose Milligan

Posted
Posted

It's hard to say...until someone says so, like "Yeah, we didn't want to give him Zito-money for fear of similar results."

Ultimately some FA moves are good, some are bad. The Sox got their value for Manny, as he lead them to two championships.

Zito turned out to be a colossal bust. I don't think anyone thought he was worth that money at all, as he had declined a bit since his Cy Young season. But I don't think anyone predicted he would be downright awful.

So it goes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sanfran327 Hangout Grand Counsel

Sanfran327

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Santana just got a similar contract and CC will as well.

So, the answer is clearly no.

One thing I do wonder is if teams are smarter about how they figure out who deserves the big deals...ie using peripherals, etc....

Do you frequently talk to hear your own voice?

I don't understand how this is "clearly" no. If anything, I'd say that if Santana's deal was LESS then you could say clearly "no."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sports Guy Hangout Grand Counsel

Sports Guy

Posted
Posted
Do you frequently talk to hear your own voice?

I don't understand how this is "clearly" no. If anything, I'd say that if Santana's deal was LESS then you could say clearly "no."

There isn't one shred of evidence that says it has effected anything.

There have been awful contracts over the years...tons of them.

They didn't change anything...Why on earth should we think Zito's will? Because you want to believe it because this is your poll and your quest to get people to agree with you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sanfran327 Hangout Grand Counsel

Sanfran327

Posted
  • Author
Posted
There isn't one shred of evidence that says it has effected anything.

There have been awful contracts over the years...tons of them.

They didn't change anything...Why on earth should we think Zito's will? Because you want to believe it because this is your poll and your quest to get people to agree with you?

I don't think I necessarily have the right answer. I'm waiting for someone to say something that will definitively change my mind though. "The answer is clearly no" certainly doesn't. That's just picking an answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Migrant Redbird All-Star

Migrant Redbird

Posted
Posted
.... I'm going to answer No, with the qualification that I don't think it's true it had "no" effect, but that the effect was minimal.

I think the effect was minimal too, but I still answered "yes". The poll didn't offer any opportunity for shades of gray.

I believe it had to have a definite effect, because it illustrated once again how risky it is to give multi-year contracts to pitchers. However, there were already plenty of examples, so it seems to be a difficult lesson for GMs to learn. The pressure to win is enormous, so there almost always seems to be some team willing to go out on a limb and offer a multi-year contract to pitchers who seem like they might make a difference. Witness not only Zito, but the Mariners with Silva this year and the Brewers with Suppan a year earlier. However, Scott Boras was unable to get Kyle Lohse the 5 year/$50M contract he wanted (Kyle has more than earned his $4.25M he's getting this year) and I have to believe that the Zito affair is one of the reasons. I'm sure that Boras had plenty of spreadsheets proving how much better Lohse was than his 63-74 career record indicated (he was 3-0 down the stretch with the Phillies last year), but the GMs weren't buying it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sports Guy Hangout Grand Counsel

Sports Guy

Posted
Posted
I don't think I necessarily have the right answer. I'm waiting for someone to say something that will definitively change my mind though. "The answer is clearly no" certainly doesn't. That's just picking an answer.

Why would your mind have any other answer but no?

What shred of evidence do you have that it has had an effect on things?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sanfran327 Hangout Grand Counsel

Sanfran327

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Why would your mind have any other answer but no?

What shred of evidence do you have that it has had an effect on things?

If you think that ANY good pitcher is going to get less money than Zito, you're mistaken. I said this in another thread, but you don't think Santana looked at Zito's deal and thought, "I'm way better than that guy. If I don't get at least what he's making, I'm not gonna sign a damn thing!"

Sabathia will be the same thing. He will get MORE than Zito's contract, mark my words. I say this because Zito's has become the contract against which all future pitchers' is to be measured. NO successful pitcher will ever earn less than him. MAYbe in years, but not in dollars per year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BaltimoreTerp Hangout Grand Counsel

BaltimoreTerp

Posted
Posted
If you think that ANY good pitcher is going to get less money than Zito, you're mistaken. I said this in another thread, but you don't think Santana looked at Zito's deal and thought, "I'm way better than that guy. If I don't get at least what he's making, I'm not gonna sign a damn thing!"

Sabathia will be the same thing. He will get MORE than Zito's contract, mark my words. I say this because Zito's has become the contract against which all future pitchers' is to be measured. NO successful pitcher will ever earn less than him. MAYbe in years, but not in dollars per year.

You do realize that SG is agreeing with you, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TyCobb Perennial All-Star

TyCobb

Posted
Posted

Yes. I think it would be harder for teams to put that much risk into one player (besides the Yankees since they have an unlimited amount of cash). I also don't see 7 year contracts for pitchers been thrown out there anymore.

Santana has been consider the best pitcher in baseball for the past 3 years when he signed the contract. Plus the Santana deal is really 6/137.5. No way the 7th year is picked up. Zito got 7/126 since there is no way his contract gets picked up.

I think CC will be looking at 5 year offers with club options for the 6th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • EddeeEddee
      Bullpen 2024

      By EddeeEddee · Posted

      Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • EddeeEddee
      Off-season Qualifying Offer Question

      By EddeeEddee · Posted

      But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • 24fps
      Off-season Qualifying Offer Question

      By 24fps · Posted

      Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • emmett16
      Jackson Holliday 2024

      By emmett16 · Posted

      I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • Can_of_corn
      Jackson Holliday 2024

      By Can_of_corn · Posted

      I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
    • emmett16
      Jackson Holliday 2024

      By emmett16 · Posted

      Actually it will.  As you noted.  MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees.  The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.  
    • Can_of_corn
      Jackson Holliday 2024

      By Can_of_corn · Posted

      My point was an overly uppercut swing isn't going to result in that low a launch angle.  Not unless he is somehow consistently topping the pitches, which seems pretty unlikely.

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...