Jump to content

A couple of thoughts about our current catchers and Adley Rutschman


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Assuming we do draft Adley Rutschman next Monday, lots of questions arise concerning the three catchers on our 40-man roster, two of whom are under control for 6 years and the other for 5.

My first question is, which one is best suited to be the back-up catcher long term?    Assuming that’s the role, does the balance of offense vs. defense shift?    Do other factors come into play more for the backup C than a starting C?

My second question is, can we get Severino to the point where he has some trade value?     He’s been worth 0.4 rWAR playing in only 26 games, and his OPS remains over .800.    That’s a fluke and it will come down, but it strikes me that he’s showing he’s capable of being a decent starting C.    He has the arm, and a good presence behind the plate.   If the hitting doesn’t completely collapse, is this a guy that a team that’s weak at C might covet and give up some actual prospects to obtain?   Do we trade him this year while he has the most service time left, or do we start him all year and try to build his perceived value, remembering that he was on the waiver wire two months ago?

My third question is, how must Chance Sisco be feeling right about now?    High draft pick, led his leagues in batting a couple of times, played at every level of our system, top 100 prospect, struggled in his first taste of the majors, sent down at the end of spring training with the last-minute pickup of Severino, hitting very well in AAA but can’t get called up right now.    And now you have the potential Rutschman pick staring you in the face.    Ouch!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If Rutschman is the O's pick, he will not make the majors until sometime in 2021.

Severino will not be arbitration eligible until after the 2020 season.  He is a good defensive catcher and  is only 25.   He could be part of the O's next contending team.  We will have to see a lot more of him to know if he can build any trade value.   His history is good defensively with no bat.   That would not bring back much as a trade chip.

Sisco is probably thinking that there are 29 other teams and he may get his chance elsewhere long term.

Wynn is 28 and will be 30 by the time Rutschman is in the majors.   He is not a long term Oriole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, wildcard said:

If Rutschman is the O's pick, he will not make the majors until sometime in 2021.

Severino will not be arbitration eligible until after the 2020 season.  He is a good defensive catcher and  is only 25.   He could be part of the O's next contending team.  We will have to see a lot more of him to know if he can build any trade value.   His history is good defensively with no bat.   That would not bring back much as a trade chip.

Sisco is probably thinking that there are 29 other teams and he may get his chance elsewhere long term.

Wynn is 28 and will be 30 by the time Rutschman is in the majors.   He is not a long term Oriole.

Zunino and Posey were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Assuming we do draft Adley Rutschman next Monday, lots of questions arise concerning the three catchers on our 40-man roster, two of whom are under control for 6 years and the other for 5.

My first question is, which one is best suited to be the back-up catcher long term?    Assuming that’s the role, does the balance of offense vs. defense shift?    Do other factors come into play more for the backup C than a starting C?

My second question is, can we get Severino to the point where he has some trade value?     He’s been worth 0.4 rWAR playing in only 26 games, and his OPS remains over .800.    That’s a fluke and it will come down, but it strikes me that he’s showing he’s capable of being a decent starting C.    He has the arm, and a good presence behind the plate.   If the hitting doesn’t completely collapse, is this a guy that a team that’s weak at C might covet and give up some actual prospects to obtain?   Do we trade him this year while he has the most service time left, or do we start him all year and try to build his perceived value, remembering that he was on the waiver wire two months ago?

My third question is, how must Chance Sisco be feeling right about now?    High draft pick, led his leagues in batting a couple of times, played at every level of our system, top 100 prospect, struggled in his first taste of the majors, sent down at the end of spring training with the last-minute pickup of Severino, hitting very well in AAA but can’t get called up right now.    And now you have the potential Rutschman pick staring you in the face.    Ouch!!!!!

Severino's .820 this year has been enough to raise his career MLB OPS to .620.  His last two stints with the Nats were worse than Chris Davis.  His AAA OPS is .664.  In the majors this year he's homering once every 18 PAs.  In the rest of his pro career his rate is once per 65.  He turns 26 in July.

90 PAs ago what was your assessment of his odds of becoming a valuable major league catcher?  My quick take is that if things fall into place for him he could have Sal Fasano's career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrungoHazewood said:

Severino's .820 this year has been enough to raise his career MLB OPS to .620.  His last two stints with the Nats were worse than Chris Davis.  His AAA OPS is .664.  In the majors this year he's homering once every 18 PAs.  In the rest of his pro career his rate is once per 65.  He turns 26 in July.

90 PAs ago what was your assessment of his odds of becoming a valuable major league catcher?  My quick take is that if things fall into place for him he could have Sal Fasano's career.

I mean, I know you are probably right.    But the guy doesn’t look like Sal Fasano.   He’s a big, strapping kid who looks like an athlete.    He looks dangerous in the batters box.  

Looking at both his MiL numbers and his Washington numbers, what really stands out is he’s been a .100 ISO guy, whereas in Baltimore he’s carrying a .233 ISO. Just looking at him, and watching his approach at the plate, I really have a hard time understanding why his ISO historically has been so low.    I mean, OK, .233 may not be sustainable, but .100?    Really? Maybe he’s figured something out in that department, because he sure looks like a guy capable of generating some power.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I mean, I know you are probably right.    But the guy doesn’t look like Sal Fasano.   He’s a big, strapping kid who looks like an athlete.    He looks dangerous in the batters box.  

Looking at both his MiL numbers and his Washington numbers, what really stands out is he’s been a .100 ISO guy, whereas in Baltimore he’s carrying a .233 ISO. Just looking at him, and watching his approach at the plate, I really have a hard time understanding why his ISO historically has been so low.    I mean, OK, .233 may not be sustainable, but .100?    Really? Maybe he’s figured something out in that department, because he sure looks like a guy capable of generating some power.    

Sherman Obando was a big strapping kid with power who kind of looked dangerous.

I hope Severino has figured something out.  You sometimes hear that catchers develop late.  I always thought that was an old wive's tale derived from them being hurt all the time, but why not.  He's going to have to keep hitting well above his resume for quite a while to change his trade value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He might be around the power true talent level most helped by the way the ball is bouncing this year.  

As a young catcher, I can give him a little more of a pass on his career batting line to date than any other position - I have to imagine that in 2016 he was one of the youngest catchers to get a substantial AAA season.  I expect being in the Nationals org with their strategy of pushing kids fast when they can handle it helped with that.

In the last few minutes I've thought more about Pedro Severino than in my whole life before to date, my takeaway is he's a more formidable rival to Sisco for longer-term playing time than I realized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

He might be around the power true talent level most helped by the way the ball is bouncing this year. 

It's early and weird things happen in small samples.  But... there are a lot of guys in the league who're putting up career power numbers.  It seems like '87 or '94.  Somebody might be this year's Wade Boggs.  For you youngins, Boggs had 118 career homers in 18 years.  24 of them in 1987, and in no other season did he reach 12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrungoHazewood said:

It's early and weird things happen in small samples.  But... there are a lot of guys in the league who're putting up career power numbers.  It seems like '87 or '94.  Somebody might be this year's Wade Boggs.  For you youngins, Boggs had 118 career homers in 18 years.  24 of them in 1987, and in no other season did he reach 12.

I remember two years ago Brett Gardner suddenly went on a random power binge, hitting 11 in the first two months of the year.   He ended up with a career high 21, a lot for a guy with 103 homers in 12 years though not quite as extreme as the Boggs example.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, baltfan said:

Could Sisco play second?  

If it was pre-1930 and that's where teams stashed someone who could hit but was not a great (in)fielder.  Guys who'd play second today played third to field the endless numbers of deadball era bunts.

Today... no.  Biggio pulled it off, but that was weird, and he was quick/fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I remember two years ago Brett Gardner suddenly went on a random power binge, hitting 11 in the first two months of the year.   He ended up with a career high 21, a lot for a guy with 103 homers in 12 years though not quite as extreme as the Boggs example.    

Brian Roberts had eight of his 97 career homers in April of 2005.  That may have been the year he tried PEDs just that one time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Assuming we do draft Adley Rutschman next Monday, lots of questions arise concerning the three catchers on our 40-man roster, two of whom are under control for 6 years and the other for 5.

My first question is, which one is best suited to be the back-up catcher long term?    Assuming that’s the role, does the balance of offense vs. defense shift?    Do other factors come into play more for the backup C than a starting C?

My second question is, can we get Severino to the point where he has some trade value?     He’s been worth 0.4 rWAR playing in only 26 games, and his OPS remains over .800.    That’s a fluke and it will come down, but it strikes me that he’s showing he’s capable of being a decent starting C.    He has the arm, and a good presence behind the plate.   If the hitting doesn’t completely collapse, is this a guy that a team that’s weak at C might covet and give up some actual prospects to obtain?   Do we trade him this year while he has the most service time left, or do we start him all year and try to build his perceived value, remembering that he was on the waiver wire two months ago?

My third question is, how must Chance Sisco be feeling right about now?    High draft pick, led his leagues in batting a couple of times, played at every level of our system, top 100 prospect, struggled in his first taste of the majors, sent down at the end of spring training with the last-minute pickup of Severino, hitting very well in AAA but can’t get called up right now.    And now you have the potential Rutschman pick staring you in the face.    Ouch!!!!!

Severino is suited to be a good backup catcher.  But by the time Rutschman gets to Baltimore, the backup catcher might not be on the roster right now.  Significant possibility.

I think he'd have a small amount of trade value unless the hitting is for real.  Keep in mind the Moose Milligan Trade Corollary™ where you have to take the position of an opposing GM while evaluating the Orioles roster.  What would you give up for a backup catcher?  You said it yourself, he was a waiver wire claim two months ago.  We're not the only ones who know that.

Don't care at all about how Chance Sisco is feeling right now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...