Jump to content

What's with the Yusniel regression?


interloper

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, cboemmeljr said:

I really don't think that roster moves/promotions are based on playoffs.  Winning a Minor League playoff sells tickets for the MiLB club.  Player development should not be based on a team's place in the standings.  I doubt Elias is looking at the standings as he determines what is best for a player's development.

Agreed.  Though some may be arguing that he wants to get guys experience in playoff situations, which is fine.  But I don't think MiLB playoffs do much to prepare you for nationally televised MLB playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 245
  • Created
  • Last Reply
7 minutes ago, joelala said:

Agreed.  Though some may be arguing that he wants to get guys experience in playoff situations, which is fine.  But I don't think MiLB playoffs do much to prepare you for nationally televised MLB playoffs.

I think it’s more the experience of playing on a winning team that pushes through a pennant race and then some pressure games, rather than any specific experience they get from the playoffs.   And, it would kind of suck for all the other players at Bowie, as well as the fans who support that team, if their best hitter was taken away just as they were making their playoff push.   I’m not saying those are important considerations compared to what is best for the player’s development, but I wouldn’t say they have zero weight, either.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

I think it’s more the experience of playing on a winning team that pushes through a pennant race and then some pressure games, rather than any specific experience they get from the playoffs.   And, it would kind of suck for all the other players at Bowie, as well as the fans who support that team, if their best hitter was taken away just as they were making their playoff push.   I’m not saying those are important considerations compared to what is best for the player’s development, but I wouldn’t say they have zero weight, either.   

Totally fair points all around.  I suppose some playoff experience is better than none, albeit experience with much lower stakes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on if there is anything player development has him working on. If they are asking him to make tweaks to his swing or approach at the plate, it makes sense to have him try new stuff in a place where he is comfortable, confident, and not worried about his playing card stats. If they are just letting him rip, he's ready to move up to Norfolk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I think it’s more the experience of playing on a winning team that pushes through a pennant race and then some pressure games, rather than any specific experience they get from the playoffs.   And, it would kind of suck for all the other players at Bowie, as well as the fans who support that team, if their best hitter was taken away just as they were making their playoff push.   I’m not saying those are important considerations compared to what is best for the player’s development, but I wouldn’t say they have zero weight, either.   

I actually completely disagree with this. Playoff baseball is a different animal at any level. The quality of competition is higher. The attention to detail better. The preparation much more thorough. I actually think it's very valuable to put guys in those situations.

I'll say it: I'd rather have Diaz playing in the playoffs in Bowie than getting meaningless at bats when our pitching just gave up 16 runs in Norfolk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I don't think Diaz has anything else to learn at AA.  At the same time, I'm trusting Elias and his team to make the right decisions.   They seem to know what they are doing.  So, for now, I'm not sweating Diaz still being in AA.  

Overall, Elias has been pretty patient with the prospects.    He doesn’t seem in a hurry to push them along.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Overall, Elias has been pretty patient with the prospects.    He doesn’t seem in a hurry to push them along.    

I don't want to see any pitcher going straight from Bowie to Baltimore because of the changes to the baseball. We've seen Norfolk go from a place all good hitting prospects go to die to Akin putting up so-so numbers yet starting the AAA All Star game because these new baseballs he led to such big offensive stats. 

I don't know how I feel about a hitter moving from Bowie to Baltimore. I don't think the balls make any difference to a hitter's approach or how a player would perform defensively. 

What I'm getting at is - Does the level Diaz plays at for the rest of the summer have any impact on where he starts next year? With an equally strong spring, could he be in Baltimore to start 2020 or is there a checkbox that needs to be marked in Norfolk before he comes up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WalkWithElias said:

I don't want to see any pitcher going straight from Bowie to Baltimore because of the changes to the baseball. We've seen Norfolk go from a place all good hitting prospects go to die to Akin putting up so-so numbers yet starting the AAA All Star game because these new baseballs he led to such big offensive stats. 

I don't know how I feel about a hitter moving from Bowie to Baltimore. I don't think the balls make any difference to a hitter's approach or how a player would perform defensively. 

What I'm getting at is - Does the level Diaz plays at for the rest of the summer have any impact on where he starts next year? With an equally strong spring, could he be in Baltimore to start 2020 or is there a checkbox that needs to be marked in Norfolk before he comes up?

Not necessarily a checkbox, but I think the options situation will come into play.    Hays and Santander will have only one option remaining, and Stewart will have two.   Diaz will have three.    So, it’s likely he starts the year in Norfolk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WalkWithElias said:

What I'm getting at is - Does the level Diaz plays at for the rest of the summer have any impact on where he starts next year? With an equally strong spring, could he be in Baltimore to start 2020 or is there a checkbox that needs to be marked in Norfolk before he comes up?

I think service time is an issue for Diaz as much as just about any guy in our system. They'll want to get the extra year and, just guessing, I think they'll use the Norfolk step to do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I actually completely disagree with this. Playoff baseball is a different animal at any level. The quality of competition is higher. The attention to detail better. The preparation much more thorough. I actually think it's very valuable to put guys in those situations.

I'll say it: I'd rather have Diaz playing in the playoffs in Bowie than getting meaningless at bats when our pitching just gave up 16 runs in Norfolk.

Here's a perspective from a former minor league baseball player that completely disagrees with you assessment.

 

Quote

 

When I was drafted back in 2004, I was immediately sent to the Toronto Blue Jays Short Season A-Ball affiliate, the Auburn Doubledays. At the time, general manager J.P. Ricciardi was well-known for his tendency to value advanced college players over projectable high-schoolers, and filled his draft boards accordingly. When I reported to Auburn, the entire team was made up of all 20+ year old kids, the overwhelming majority of them having played at least 2 years of college baseball (I played 4). In the infield alone, our catcher was an All-American from the University of Texas, our two first baseman were All-Americans from the Citadel and the University of Southern California, the 2nd baseman was an All-Pac 10 performer at Stanford, the shortstop was an All-SEC player at Vanderbilt, and myself (at 3rd). Our team finished the season with the best record in the New York Penn League with a 50-24 record, which I believe at the time, was one of the best regular seasons in NY Penn League history.

Why do I bring this up? Across our entire roster of collegiate All Americans and All-Conference performers, only 8 players out of 46 total, made it to the Big Leagues. Only 2 of them, pitcher Casey Jannsen and outfielder Adam Lind, accumulated more than 1 year in service time. So, while we dominated our respective league and put together one of the greatest seasons in league history, what did it amount to at the Big League level? Next to zero.

And that’s the underlying problem with Baggery’s article – wins and losses at the minor league level are 100% meaningless. While some front offices and organizations may claim they care about winning, nothing could be further from the truth, and my role within the organization was a direct reflection of that. At the minor league level, success is based solely on individual player development based around top prospects.


 

https://straight108.com/2017/06/04/extrabaggs/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, TINSTAAPP said:

Here's a perspective from a former minor league baseball player that completely disagrees with you assessment.

 

https://straight108.com/2017/06/04/extrabaggs/

I don't think he directly addressed the point I was making, though I do think his opinion applies well to what we think about Aberdeen and GCL this year.

I'm talking about the specific benefit of a top player getting ABs in the thick of a pennant race/playoff series. I'm not saying it'll take our C prospect and turn him into an A+ guy, but I would rather that than having our guys getting essentially meaningless ABs against guys who couldn't even be called up for September promotions in games that don't matter, just playing out the string.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think “learning to win” is less important in baseball than in football or basketball, but I would certainly prefer players to get accustomed to a culture of winning as they develop.

As it pertains to this situation, I would almost rather the opposite of Diaz’s situation, have the opportunity to bring someone up that is on the cusp of promotion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...