Jump to content

Cody Allen designated for assignment.


bpilktree

Recommended Posts

This seems like a decent gamble imo to be pick up.  Still just 30 and has had success in past wasn’t pitching that bad for Angels then they pushed him 2 innings week ago and had 2 very bad outings after to balloon his ERA.  He can’t be worse then guys like Strally and maybe get little hot for two months and can move at deadline.  I am sure he clears waivers as salary go high to take on so might be tough to get him as might want to go somewhere else but he could come here and get an opportunity to bounce back some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it's not.  We would owe the balance of his $8.2 million deal.  Givens has gotten back on track it seems, and Castro has excelled in a later inning role since his rough end of April.  I'd rather focus on those two growing their value than trying to fit Allen into the back of the bullpen, paying him close to $5 million and the deadline only being six weeks away- and he won't get added to the roster for another five days or so at the very least.  

If we still had the waiver trade deadline, then it's something to consider, but without that and his price tag, I'll pass.  Let Givens and Castro have at the late inning roles and build their value towards potential off-season trades. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ThomasTomasz said:

No it's not.  We would owe the balance of his $8.2 million deal.  Givens has gotten back on track it seems, and Castro has excelled in a later inning role since his rough end of April.  I'd rather focus on those two growing their value than trying to fit Allen into the back of the bullpen, paying him close to $5 million and the deadline only being six weeks away- and he won't get added to the roster for another five days or so at the very least.  

If we still had the waiver trade deadline, then it's something to consider, but without that and his price tag, I'll pass.  Let Givens and Castro have at the late inning roles and build their value towards potential off-season trades. 

No one is going to claim him he will pass through so all the team would owe is about 300 k.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bpilktree said:

No one is going to claim him he will pass through so all the team would owe is about 300 k.  

I highly doubt he signs with the Orioles out of all the available teams.  Some of the contenders even need bullpen help and could give him a role immediately and work into high leverage- think Boston.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

This seems like a decent gamble imo to be pick up.  Still just 30 and has had success in past wasn’t pitching that bad for Angels then they pushed him 2 innings week ago and had 2 very bad outings after to balloon his ERA.  He can’t be worse then guys like Strally and maybe get little hot for two months and can move at deadline.  I am sure he clears waivers as salary go high to take on so might be tough to get him as might want to go somewhere else but he could come here and get an opportunity to bounce back some.

You are not picking someone up in the middle of June off the waiver wire and trading them for anything useful at the deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bpilktree said:

This seems like a decent gamble imo to be pick up.  Still just 30 and has had success in past wasn’t pitching that bad for Angels then they pushed him 2 innings week ago and had 2 very bad outings after to balloon his ERA.  He can’t be worse then guys like Strally and maybe get little hot for two months and can move at deadline.  I am sure he clears waivers as salary go high to take on so might be tough to get him as might want to go somewhere else but he could come here and get an opportunity to bounce back some.

If you claim him, you pay 8,3 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ThomasTomasz said:

No it's not.  We would owe the balance of his $8.2 million deal.  Givens has gotten back on track it seems, and Castro has excelled in a later inning role since his rough end of April.  I'd rather focus on those two growing their value than trying to fit Allen into the back of the bullpen, paying him close to $5 million and the deadline only being six weeks away- and he won't get added to the roster for another five days or so at the very least.  

If we still had the waiver trade deadline, then it's something to consider, but without that and his price tag, I'll pass.  Let Givens and Castro have at the late inning roles and build their value towards potential off-season trades. 

Castro isn’t building any value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

Castro isn’t building any value.

His numbers are skewed from two early season mishaps when he was testing out new mechanics.  Since May, opponents are hitting .185/.259/.387 against him.  His fastball velocity is up over 1 MPH over last year, his strikeout rate has increased from 2018 while his walk rate has decreased.  The only thing that's bothersome is that he still tends to the long ball. 

Also interesting are his home and away slashes.  He is definitely better on the road, but that is to be expected from a flyball pitcher- as well as both of those games from earlier in the year being at home.  

While he's not going to get a top prospect in all of baseball, Castro still his controllable years, is 24 years old, has a live arm and if you dive into the numbers, it shows a player who definitely has some value to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ThomasTomasz said:

His numbers are skewed from two early season mishaps when he was testing out new mechanics.  Since May, opponents are hitting .185/.259/.387 against him.  His fastball velocity is up over 1 MPH over last year, his strikeout rate has increased from 2018 while his walk rate has decreased.  The only thing that's bothersome is that he still tends to the long ball. 

Also interesting are his home and away slashes.  He is definitely better on the road, but that is to be expected from a flyball pitcher- as well as both of those games from earlier in the year being at home.  

While he's not going to get a top prospect in all of baseball, Castro still his controllable years, is 24 years old, has a live arm and if you dive into the numbers, it shows a player who definitely has some value to him.

We got him from the Rockies for a PTBNL. He’s got undeveloped talent but he has no value. He’s inconsistent. Gives up too many walks. Has an FIP over 5, which doesn’t include the inherited runners he’s allowed to score. Nobody wants him. If you want to keep him because we have no one better, fine. But he has no trade value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
    • Bingo....I have said this before also. Wives of players are not clamoring to come near B-More. Factor in taxes and its a hard sell.
    • I don't think anyone offers him more than 3m. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...