Jump to content

We are Number Eight


weams

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

So you're saying that the team moved from somewhere around 25th or 28th in the rankings to 8th or 12th solely on the basis of players acquired in the last eight months?  That seems kind of unlikely.  Development of players already here, drafted or otherwise acquired in the Duquette era, have to be some of it.

Drungo, have you considered the fact that Dan was here when things went South......so he's bad?  And the moves he made were bad?

But now Elias is the one in the power seat, and our rankings have gone up.......so everything he has done must be good?

Sometimes it's just easier to view everything in the universe as black-and-white.   Nuance is hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Drungo, have you considered the fact that Dan was here when things went South......so he's bad?  And the moves he made were bad?

But now Elias is the one in the power seat, and our rankings have gone up.......so everything he has done must be good?

Sometimes it's just easier to view everything in the universe as black-and-white.   Nuance is hard.

The real x-factor is Peter Angelos not making the decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Drungo, have you considered the fact that Dan was here when things went South......so he's bad?  And the moves he made were bad?

But now Elias is the one in the power seat, and our rankings have gone up.......so everything he has done must be good?

Sometimes it's just easier to view everything in the universe as black-and-white.   Nuance is hard.

I took a seminar on Capitol Hill a few years ago, and there was a pamphlet they handed out with the Senators' voting tendencies*.  Ted Cruz voted for bills supported by Barack Obama something like 44% of the time.  

Much of life and much of any job is just doing stuff that's obvious, non-controversial, that you need to do.  Every single MLB GM would agree with most of what every other GM does.

* US Senators, not Walter Johnson and Frank Howard.  But did you know that Walter Johnson was a Coolidge Republican, and unsuccessfully ran for Congress in 1940?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Nice to see the progress. For all the criticism that Duquette has received he certainly deserves some credit.

Rajsich deserves all that credit not DD. And he acquired all of that talent despite DD holding him back by forfeiting numerous high draft picks for short term FA fixes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

So you're saying that the team moved from somewhere around 25th or 28th in the rankings to 8th or 12th solely on the basis of players acquired in the last eight months?  That seems kind of unlikely.  Development of players already here, drafted or otherwise acquired in the Duquette era, have to be some of it.

Oh I don’t deny that some Dan picks still have possibilities. Grenier doesn’t look like he should have been picked where he was certainly, Mountcastle doesn’t have a position, and Harvey has been injured his whole career, but there are some guys who still have potential.

The issue isn’t really whether Dan did or didn’t draft well (although I don’t think he did) but that he traded top prospects, gave up draft picks, traded away draft picks and made no attempt to plan for the future. Some of that was on the FO, but enough of it was on Dan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

So you're saying that the team moved from somewhere around 25th or 28th in the rankings to 8th or 12th solely on the basis of players acquired in the last eight months?  That seems kind of unlikely.  Development of players already here, drafted or otherwise acquired in the Duquette era, have to be some of it.

Oh I don’t deny that some Dan picks still have possibilities. Grenier doesn’t look like he should have been picked where he was certainly, Mountcastle doesn’t have a position, and Harvey has been injured his whole career, but there are some guys who still have potential.

The issue isn’t really whether Dan did or didn’t draft well (although I don’t think he did) but that he traded top prospects, gave up draft picks, traded away draft picks and made no attempt to plan for the future. Some of that was on the FO, but enough of it was on Dan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Positive is, most of these prospects, save Mountcastle, probably won't graduate to the majors, add another group of highly drafted prospects next June, add in continued improvement by specs like Baumann, and you could easily see us move into the Top 3-5 in next July's farm rankings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

A lot of midseason top 200s have the Orioles with 5 in the top 100 and Hall joining them in the top 200.

Adam Hall?

200/30= 6.7 top 200 players per team.    If all we have is 6, that’s not particularly impressive.   But 5 in the top 100 is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Philip said:

Oh I don’t deny that some Dan picks still have possibilities. Grenier doesn’t look like he should have been picked where he was certainly, Mountcastle doesn’t have a position, and Harvey has been injured his whole career, but there are some guys who still have potential.

The issue isn’t really whether Dan did or didn’t draft well (although I don’t think he did) but that he traded top prospects, gave up draft picks, traded away draft picks and made no attempt to plan for the future. Some of that was on the FO, but enough of it was on Dan.

What top prospect did he trade away.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Sports Guy- Isn't attendance becoming more of a  legacy statistic similar to Avg v. OPS?  It's a very different era than 1965 when there were few suites or "premium" seating and hardly any amenities beyond a beer and hot dog.  Today a seat and it's attachment rate are not comparable between say NY and KC-and we've seen the leverage of corporate sponsorship with TRP.  In the Warehouse I would think growing attachment rate and corporate partners would at some point have comparable priority as a revenue driver.  Seat sales account only ~20% of revenue and shrinking,  The revenue tilt is upgrading fans/corps. to a premium seat at an average of 4X the price.   Although this slide is from '22 it details the discrepancy between teams that can leverage premium seating and suites.  Playoff revenue is also likely in this slide which benefits teams like Houston. There is no real way I have found to judge revenue other than Forbes-just food for thought.  
    • The Mountcastle injury hasn't felt like a huge deal since we have a similarly-performing O'Hearn to slot into the same position.  But I think the lineup misses him. He is better than Eloy, Rivera, and the other guys his ABs are getting distributed to. And better defensively than O'Hearn.
    • There could be some interesting stuff to talk about here, or individual cases where what you're saying is true, but I think the short answer is no. Analytics are going to be more accurate overall than the old-school axioms-- the axioms that are provably true are probably still coached.   On point 1 we definitely have some players struggling to make adjustments and some of that may be that they're coached to hunt barrels at the expense of contact. The O's are built to maximize power and you can see that in their results (1st in SLG but 9th in AVG). Maybe a different approach could help some guys break out of a slump more easily, but it's hard to know because there are always struggling players no matter the coaching approach. Were the the Showalter O's missing old-school wisdom when they let Adam Jones continue whiffing on low and away sliders?  Point 2 I probably buy the least because pitching analytics across MLB have been so generally effective in helping players maximize their game. Probably there are ways the O's could be using their data better. Not every decision and result will be perfect. But analytics is golden for pitchers.  On point 3, is there any reason to think the O's are generally weak on defensive fundamentals compared to most teams? Gunnar had his recent error binge but that's all I can think of and that seemed more like a personal thing to me. 
    • To be fair, out of 434 batters with more than 100 PA’s, Norby is tied for 2nd in terms of wOBA - xwOBA. Not saying he wouldn’t be useful here, but his average exit velocity, Chase %, whose rate, K%, and BB% all look like they’re bottom 20th percentile. And his defense is very bad.  Again, he would be useful as a DH and obviously his hot streak would be nice, but not sure how sustainable it is. I’m more concerned that all their young guys are struggling and Norby has seen immediate results, sustainable or not. 
    • I've said for years that teams should spend for a minor league dietician and a chef for each team.  I'm not talking anything fancy but something healthy and free.
    • I bought a season ticket package this year for the first time since 2014. I have renewed for next year. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...