Jump to content

I really want to keep Villar (Update: Traded to Marlins for LHS Easton Lucas)


AceKing

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

What was offered in July?

I don't know if anything was offered.  Elias just said he didn't make any deals at the deadline because the trades would have decreased the level of talent in the organization.  For all we know he was talking about Mancini. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think if he was offered two 17 year old Dominicans I won't fault him for holding onto him in hopes of getting a better deal in the offseason.

Except Villar didn't do anything between the trade deadline and the end of the season to hurt his value, so if two 17 year-old Dominicans was the offer, and he thought he could get more then he misread the market and for that it is fair to fault him. Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Legend_Of_Joey said:

We don't know. But there was atleast an offer. 

And maybe the offer was inconsequential enough that it made sense to keep him hoping his value would go up. 

Obviously this hasn't worked out great. But I'm struggling to see where Elias is at fault rather than the market is saying Villar has no trade value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MurphDogg said:

Except Villar didn't do anything between the trade deadline and the end of the season to hurt his value, so if two 17 year-old Dominicans was the offer, and he thought he could get more then he misread the market and for that it is fair to fault him. Right?

Sure you could.  But I think the potential reward makes that an acceptable risk to take. 

Hard to say which route would be superior from a process standpoint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MurphDogg said:

Except Villar didn't do anything between the trade deadline and the end of the season to hurt his value, so if two 17 year-old Dominicans was the offer, and he thought he could get more then he misread the market and for that it is fair to fault him. Right?

The fans now calling for Elias head got a marvelous third of a season out of Villar afterwards. Excitement and 40 steals.  So Mike paid for that. He felt the fans were worth it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

And you can conclude that having no idea what, if anything was offered at the deadline?

And you know he won't be traded between now and Monday night?

My conclusion is based on him getting traded for nothing. If he is traded for something between now and Monday, the conclusion could be different, although I don't see how given the complete lack of leverage.

It is based on what was stated at the time, that they were offered something at the deadline, but the offer didn't meet the Orioles standard. If that is incorrect, then the conclusion could be different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

Pretty sure Elias knew they wouldn't tender him a contract by the deadline, sometime back before the trade deadline.

Also, he isn't DFA'ed...

My mistake. Placed on waivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 7Mo said:

And maybe the offer was inconsequential enough that it made sense to keep him hoping his value would go up. 

Obviously this hasn't worked out great. But I'm struggling to see where Elias is at fault rather than the market is saying Villar has no trade value.

Maybe the offer required money or international slots to complete. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roch now has a blog post about how Bundy's 5.7 million dollar estimate arbitration salary is steep territory for a rebuilding team.   I guess he will be traded or released by today.  I wonder how much money the son's want to take out of the franchise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weams said:

The fans now calling for Elias head got a marvelous third of a season out of Villar afterwards. Excitement and 40 steals.  So Mike paid for that. He felt the fans were worth it. 

Perhaps. I don't necessarily believe that, but it would be an understandable explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Per Roch:   For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Jordan Westburg 2B Anthony Santander RF Colton Cowser LF Adley Rutschman C Ryan O’Hearn DH Ryan Mountcastle 1B Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Cade Povich LHP For the Twins Manuel Margot RF Carlos Correa SS Byron Buxton CF Carlos Santana 1B Royce Lewis 3B Kyle Farmer 2B Ryan Jeffers DH Christian Vázquez C Willi Castro LF Pablo López RHP    
    • That would be pretty cool. Just do me a favor and please don't start the magic number thread in June next season.
    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...