Jump to content

Matusz Article


Satyr3206

Recommended Posts

Just read the article in the Sun. Apparently Matusz wants around 5 million to sign. While I never fault anyone for making as much as they can, this seems high to me. The 4th pick last year got around 2.75 million. The record is 6.1 million and Matusz wants double what last years pick signed for? Now the e mail to the media outlets is making sense. A preemptive strike to get more pressure on the FO maybe? Any opinions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just read the article in the Sun. Apparently Matusz wants around 5 million to sign. While I never fault anyone for making as much as they can, this seems high to me. The 4th pick last year got around 2.75 million. The record is 6.1 million and Matusz wants double what last years pick signed for? Now the e mail to the media outlets is making sense. A preemptive strike to get more pressure on the FO maybe? Any opinions?

Well...we gave Wieters 6Million last year, and he was worth every penny it seems...it they feel he is worth it, pull the trigger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the minors board:

We'll see. I've laid out parameters in other posts and find the $4M number very difficult to understand as pitchers have been drafted fourth overall the past two drafts and neither received over $2.8M. Last year's third overall pick received $3.2M. Perhaps Matusz is rated a good bit higher than all three of the above players, but Reynolds and Vitters were drafted on merit.

IMO, anything north of $3.25M to $3.5M is overpaying relative to what Vitters, Reynolds and Moskos received. I would like to meet the prospect that turns down $3.25M and heads back to school.

$5M is too much, if thats what it takes, I don't really have a problem with them letting him go back and taking our chances with a pick next year.

I feel we'll probably sign him for somewhere in that $3.5M range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow - i would call the bluff and take the extra pick next year. use that money to wrap up any remaining players we have not yet signed.

5MM is stiff money - i don't see us going there, but who knows....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope they call his bluff. He won't go back to school. He isn't going to pass on 3 million dollars.:rolleyes:

If he does pass then start scouting for next years pick. If the guy was worth all that he wouldn't have lasted until the fourth pick. He wasn't considered a signability risk at the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well...we gave Wieters 6Million last year, and he was worth every penny it seems...it they feel he is worth it, pull the trigger.

I look at Wieters different than Matusz. He's an everyday player at a very important position. He's also a switch hitter with power.

Matusz may end up being great but pitchers are at more risk for injuries. Look no further than Loewen.

I think 5 mil is too much. Don't think MacPhail should do it and I don't think he will. Keep the money and get another pick next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I look at Wieters different than Matusz. He's an everyday player at a very important position. He's also a switch hitter with power.

Matusz may end up being great but pitchers are at more risk for injuries. Look no further than Loewen.

I think 5 mil is too much. Don't think MacPhail should do it and I don't think he will. Keep the money and get another pick next year.

I agree...I said if they feel he's worth it; I have no problem if they feel he isn't worth it in letting him walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who leaked the numbers to the media? MacPhail doesn't negotiate through the media.

He was picked one slot above Wieters.

Since MacPhail didn't leak it and Jordan had a no comment it most likely came from the Matusz camp. Probably his agent if I were a betting man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Orioles can't reach an agreement with Matusz this year, they run the risk of losing the first round pick entirely if they can't sign the player they draft in the compensation position next year. Compensation picks last only one time. If you don't sign someone you draft with a compensation pick for not signing someone the previous year, you lose it if you can't sign the player two years in a row.

A player would gets drafted with a compensation pick has all the leverage in the world. He knows that a team doesn't want to lose the pick entirely, so he can play real hard ball with the team drafting him.

I am sure the Orioles would rather not be in that position next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Orioles can't reach an agreement with Matusz this year, they run the risk of losing the first round pick entirely if they can't sign the player they draft in the compensation position next year.

I am sure the Orioles would rather not be in that position next year.

This is an entirely overrated scenario. Worse comes to worse we work out a pre-draft deal with a slightly lesser talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as he's willing to take the 5 million without a ML deal, I give it to him. It's not like we don't have the money. He's a top college pitcher which means like Price he could be ready to help as soon as late 2009. And if he's as good as we think he'll be a #2 or #3 starter under control quite cheaply for quite some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Orioles can't reach an agreement with Matusz this year, they run the risk of losing the first round pick entirely if they can't sign the player they draft in the compensation position next year. Compensation picks last only one time. If you don't sign someone you draft with a compensation pick for not signing someone the previous year, you lose it if you can't sign the player two years in a row.

A player would gets drafted with a compensation pick has all the leverage in the world. He knows that a team doesn't want to lose the pick entirely, so he can play real hard ball with the team drafting him.

I am sure the Orioles would rather not be in that position next year.

I'm sure they wouldn't, but there has to be some sense of sanity to this. If we were beating up the front door for David Price, I might (MIGHT!) be more inclined to extend, but as much as I like Matusz, there really was not a super stud pitching prospect in this draft (with all due respect to all the pitchers) - this was a positional player draft and teams loved every last ounce of it.

Pass....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Works for me,  as long as the first piece is a Norby type!  Only one of Ortiz/Westburg/Cowser/Kjerstad should be traded for Cease.  Let them pick one of them and a couple in the 8-15 range then a lottery pick or two if needed.  But giving up 2 of those is to pricy for the return.  I like Cease, but personally value him as a very solid #3 starter.  Sure, he COULD perform better than that,  but I wouldn't bet on it.  Maybe he reverts back to his 2022 form, but I think it more likely that what we get is what we saw from him in 2023, with an improvement in numbers due to the defense behind him. 
    • Exited about this kid and the future of our international signings. We have to remember the initial reporting don’t mean a whole lot. We’ve had success in the 100-500 k range too.
    • Downtown restaurants should like this too.  Much better for any local entertainment venues.
    • Cease is a solid MLB starting pitcher with 2 years of control  who's team has clearly made it known that he's available.  Of course there is a lot of interest.  There is a lot of interest in the Orioles' prospects, as well.  Fans of both teams are hopeful that their team will get maximum value for their assets in any trade.  I'm sure that it is sometimes difficult for GMs to reach a meeting of the minds on a player's value, in which case they need to work out a restructure of the discussed deal that may not include that player.  I think Elias' opinion on Ortiz is likely to be pretty close to what posters on this site are telling you.  If the White Sox GM views Ortiz as you do, it would seem that a deal between the two teams would most likely not have Ortiz included.  I'm sure that isn't all that unusual and the GMs just turn the page and look at working out a trade involving other players/prospects.  What confuses me is that you seem to rate Ortiz lower than we do and lower than the various sites rate him, but would like a trade of Cease for Cowser and Ortiz.  I'm against that deal because I think 2 prospects rated that highly would be an overpay.  It seems to me, you agree.  You simply rate Ortiz lower.  Seems to me that the answer in such an impasse that would make both parties happy would be to replace Ortiz with another prospect that is lower rated than Ortiz -- which would be of equal value in your mind, since you rate Ortiz lower and still think the proposed trade is a fair one.  Make sense?  Maybe replace Ortiz with Norby.
    • I would definitely do Westburg  and Cowser.
    • 100% agree with you.  Especially when you haves waves of prospects coming up behind these guys.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...