Jump to content

KG for 2020


BohKnowsBmore

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

KG would be fine on a short deal IMO. I don’t think he would come back unless he has no other opportunities.

 I don’t think Elias would prefer him over any other comparable option. I don’t think they will care that he was here before.

(1) there may not be many comparable options (i.e. combination of recent poor performance, proven ability at the ML level, relative youth)

(2) it may be just as important that KG knows Baltimore and may be more open to coming here to reestablish value vs. other comparable options who have no experience pitching in Baltimore

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

(1) there may not be many comparable options (i.e. combination of recent poor performance, proven ability at the ML level, relative youth)

(2) it may be just as important that KG knows Baltimore and may be more open to coming here to reestablish value vs. other comparable options who have no experience pitching in Baltimore

I agree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, jarman86 said:

If he is best option available to us as a starter candidate, then sure. Everyone is keen to rush Kremer and Akin to the show, and in the same breath talks how Gausman was rushed and shuttled back and forth.  Arrieta was used the same way.  I hope we buy 1-2 capable starters to short term contracts then rush our prospects.  Hopefully, the prospects will force Elias to trade or cut the guys we signed.  That's just my two cents.  Elias said Akin isn't ready and I think our Bowie rotation needs a couple months in AAA. 

It’s a big stretch to compare Akin’s development path to Gausman’s.    Akin’s has been as methodical as can be: one full year at Frederick, one full year at Bowie, one full year at Norfolk.     Gausman on the other hand had 47.1 innings at Bowie before being called to the majors the first time, then was yo-yoed back and forth between the minors and the majors during the rest of 2013 and in 2014-15.

Edit:   I do not mean to suggest that I would have Akin on our OD roster next year.   He was just so-so in AAA, and I’d be fine giving him another month or two down there, both to give him a little more time to find his groove and to preserve service time.    And, I think Kremer will need most or all of the year in AAA.     He didn’t exactly thrive once he got promoted and started using the major league ball last year.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎9‎/‎27‎/‎2019 at 6:45 AM, Frobby said:

It’s a big stretch to compare Akin’s development path to Gausman’s.    Akin’s has been as methodical as can be: one full year at Frederick, one full year at Bowie, one full year at Norfolk.     Gausman on the other hand had 47.1 innings at Bowie before being called to the majors the first time, then was yo-yoed back and forth between the minors and the majors during the rest of 2013 and in 2014-15.

Edit:   I do not mean to suggest that I would have Akin on our OD roster next year.   He was just so-so in AAA, and I’d be fine giving him another month or two down there, both to give him a little more time to find his groove and to preserve service time.    And, I think Kremer will need most or all of the year in AAA.     He didn’t exactly thrive once he got promoted and started using the major league ball last year.    

I wasn't comparing developments, just stating that I would prefer Akin to come up and stay up, at least for a while, rather than the shuttle bus to and from Norfolk that every other pitching prospect was on in the Showalter days.  That messes with a pitcher's routine and psyche.  Just when people are calling for these prospects to get a chance and promoted, no one has been banging on the door exactly pitching wise, so my point was I'd rather pay for some MLB starters on 1-2 year deals than just go back to our old system of chewing up prospects. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, jarman86 said:

I wasn't comparing developments, just stating that I would prefer Akin to come up and stay up, at least for a while, rather than the shuttle bus to and from Norfolk that every other pitching prospect was on in the Showalter days.  That messes with a pitcher's routine and psyche.  Just when people are calling for these prospects to get a chance and promoted, no one has been banging on the door exactly pitching wise, so my point was I'd rather pay for some MLB starters on 1-2 year deals than just go back to our old system of chewing up prospects. 

Thanks for the clarification, and I agree.    Of course, it’s easier to ride with a pitcher who’s going through some growing pains at the major league level when you’re not in contention.   Showalter was in a different position for most of his tenure here.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/23/2019 at 9:39 PM, BohKnowsBmore said:

How would you feel about bringing KG back for 2020 to be the #4/#5 SP? He’s been pretty bad this season, so I’m guessing he’ll be non-tendered. Seems like he might be a decent reclamation project target given his pedigree and past success in Baltimore. Maybe a cheap 2020 with an option for 2021?

I think Gausman is exactly the type of pitcher we will be targeting this off-season.  I would not be surprised (or mad) if this happens. 2020 off-season I hope we will be setting our goals a little higher 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jarman86 said:

I wasn't comparing developments, just stating that I would prefer Akin to come up and stay up, at least for a while, rather than the shuttle bus to and from Norfolk that every other pitching prospect was on in the Showalter days.  That messes with a pitcher's routine and psyche.  Just when people are calling for these prospects to get a chance and promoted, no one has been banging on the door exactly pitching wise, so my point was I'd rather pay for some MLB starters on 1-2 year deals than just go back to our old system of chewing up prospects. 

My expectation is that this management will not buy any pitching. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, connja said:

I think Gausman is exactly the type of pitcher we will be targeting this off-season.  I would not be surprised (or mad) if this happens. 2020 off-season I hope we will be setting our goals a little higher 

I believe with all my heart that the Orioles will not be "targeting" anything. That costs money. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I expect similar conduct to last offseason.   Maybe 1-2 flyers on Kearns/Straily types.    Otherwise, waiver wire and MiL free agents.   

Straily was during the season correct? I think the Karns thing was a mistake. And it is one not likely to be repeated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, weams said:

Straily was during the season correct? I think the Kearns thing was a mistake. And it is one not likely to be repeated. 

Meh, the Karns thing might have worked out, it just didn’t.    Very little money involved.    I’m not against a well-targeted flyer or two on pitchers like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Meh, the Karns thing might have worked out, it just didn’t.    Very little money involved.    I’m not against a well-targeted flyer or two on pitchers like that.

I think the Straily was essentially at minimum also. So yeah.  I don;t see them spending a million though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, connja said:

I think Gausman is exactly the type of pitcher we will be targeting this off-season.  I would not be surprised (or mad) if this happens. 2020 off-season I hope we will be setting our goals a little higher 

I think we will be targeting any pitcher who throws hard and is willing to take the minimum.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Per Roch:   For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Jordan Westburg 2B Anthony Santander RF Colton Cowser LF Adley Rutschman C Ryan O’Hearn DH Ryan Mountcastle 1B Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Cade Povich LHP For the Twins Manuel Margot RF Carlos Correa SS Byron Buxton CF Carlos Santana 1B Royce Lewis 3B Kyle Farmer 2B Ryan Jeffers DH Christian Vázquez C Willi Castro LF Pablo López RHP    
    • That would be pretty cool. Just do me a favor and please don't start the magic number thread in June next season.
    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...