Jump to content

Who Will Have the Higher Trade Value This Offseason, Alberto or Villar?


mdbdotcom

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

As a 4 win player per Fangraphs in 2019, Villar's BSR was a league leading 10.5. He went from being an above average baserunner to the best baserunner in baseball. Steamer projects his BSR to 3.0 which is essentially his average level between 2016-18 (3.5/2.6/3.3). That doesn't account for all of the drop, but it is a pretty big factor, and the biggest area where Villar's 2018 season WAS an outlier from his history.

Will the rear Villar please stand up and show yourself. :) :) :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

By "not bad" do you mean possibly flirting with .500? If yes, then I agree. If you mean contending then there's no chance in hell. 

Is 65 wins this year, 75 next, and 85 in 2022 that outrageous?  Or something like 60, 72, 90 happens all the time.  The Astros went from 51 wins in 2013 to playoffs in 2015.  Starting in 2012 the Cubs went 61, 66, 73, 97.  The Tigers were in the Series in '06 after winning 43 in '03.  About every 20 years for the last century the Braves have a season where they go from 65 wins to 90.

It may not be likely that they're contenders in '22, but it's not a huge reach.  It doesn't require a '89 or '12 level miracle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Is 65 wins this year, 75 next, and 85 in 2022 that outrageous?  Or something like 60, 72, 90 happens all the time.  The Astros went from 51 wins in 2013 to playoffs in 2015.  Starting in 2012 the Cubs went 61, 66, 73, 97.  The Tigers were in the Series in '06 after winning 43 in '03.  About every 20 years for the last century the Braves have a season where they go from 65 wins to 90.

It may not be likely that they're contenders in '22, but it's not a huge reach.  It doesn't require a '89 or '12 level miracle.

The thing is, I'm not sure we've hit rock bottom yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Is 65 wins this year, 75 next, and 85 in 2022 that outrageous?  Or something like 60, 72, 90 happens all the time.  The Astros went from 51 wins in 2013 to playoffs in 2015.  Starting in 2012 the Cubs went 61, 66, 73, 97.  The Tigers were in the Series in '06 after winning 43 in '03.  About every 20 years for the last century the Braves have a season where they go from 65 wins to 90.

It may not be likely that they're contenders in '22, but it's not a huge reach.  It doesn't require a '89 or '12 level miracle.

it does for those posters drinking the kool-aid and believing the world is flat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

it does for those posters drinking the kool-aid and believing the world is flat.

1) The Orioles haven't given us much hope the last few years that we're on the verge of reaching Asia by sailing west.

2) Fans in general tend to think that teams move in predictable, linear steps.  They'll win 60 this year, 70 the next, 80, then 90.  But probably more often they do things like 63, 67, 67, 93.  In 2011 we had many discussions about whether the O's would be in contention in '15 or '18, but certainly no earlier.  We had the same discussions in '06 about '10 or '12 or later.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the 1st round pick-less 2014 year, we've tabbed 1-25 Stewart, 1-36 Mountcastle, 1-27 Sedlock, 1-21 DL Hall, 1-11 Rodriguez, 1-1 Rutschman, with 2020's 1-2 pick TBD.  

In 2022 it'll be the Top Four prospects Age 22/23/24/25 seasons, and they'll all be at the MLB minimum.  Martin, Torkelson, or Hancock might contribute that year if we go NCAA again.   A lot of the rest is details, especially if the group can earn an A free agent's attention over the next 24 months.  

We didn't have but Roberts/Bigbie/Matos/Ponson when Tejada signed.  Even Means/Hays/Diaz/Harvey might be able to hang with that quartet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

It's not always or even usually linear, incremental steps.  The 2006 Rays had a 5.58 ERA.  Flatly abysmal.  The 2007 Rays had a 3.82.

Sure, but those Rays actually had some real pitching prospects and guys who were expected to be that good.

Their impact arms: Rodriguez and Hall are still a way off. I don't think we can expect Kremer, Baumann, Lowther, and Akin all to make it. Harvey has to stay healthy. There's a lot of work to be done for the O's to have something similar to what the Rays had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, theocean said:

Sure, but those Rays actually had some real pitching prospects and guys who were expected to be that good.

Their impact arms: Rodriguez and Hall are still a way off. I don't think we can expect Kremer, Baumann, Lowther, and Akin all to make it. Harvey has to stay healthy. There's a lot of work to be done for the O's to have something similar to what the Rays had.

We're not talking about this year.  We're talking about how they could potentially get over .500 in 2022.  

In 2005 Scott Kazmir was pitching for the Rays, but otherwise: 

- Edwin Jackson was terrible in AAA (8.62 ERA in 55 innings) and for the Dodgers
- James Shields spent most of the year in AA
- Matt Garza was in rookie ball and low A
- Andy Sonnastine split the year between the California League and the Midwest League
- And David Price was a freshman at Vanderbilt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

We're not talking about this year.  We're talking about how they could potentially get over .500 in 2022.  

In 2005 Scott Kazmir was pitching for the Rays, but otherwise: 

- Edwin Jackson was terrible in AAA (8.62 ERA in 55 innings) and for the Dodgers
- James Shields spent most of the year in AA
- Matt Garza was in rookie ball and low A
- Andy Sonnastine split the year between the California League and the Midwest League
- And David Price was a freshman at Vanderbilt

Good points all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
    • Roster Resource thinks it has tonight's lineup and Kjerstad on bench again. He is 7 AB shy of 130 MLB regular season AB with 3 games left, and if he ends up short some prospect list makers may still label him one.    If still with the Orioles, he will be 26 years old by Sarasota. I think the OP has its answer as it has been Cole and Lopez these two nights and the team is preparing for that intensity.
    • I care I bet the over on 88 wins, looked like a lock now not so much, come on O’s, daddy needs some new shoes
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...