Jump to content

Anyone got nine more years? ...


weams

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Put it this way: it may have taken 10 years to win a postseason series, but their regular season success has been very good in the last 8 years and I won’t necessarily consider 2019 to be more successful than 2012, 2014, 2016 and 2017 (when they won division titles) just because they won one postseason series.    Now if they win the next one and go to the WS, I’ll say I consider that a more successful season than their previous division-winning seasons.    

They will have had a more successful postseason.  Not a more successful season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take the Nats last 5 years of "failure" as the O's next 5 years.  To me, a large part of the excitement of baseball is being in a pennant race or wild card race where every game matters.  If Elias can lead the O's to the postseason 80% of the time, even if the O's aren't winning in the postseason, I would have a hard time calling that a failure, especially when the O's are probably having to knock out the Yankees or Red Sox to get to the postseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

They will have had a more successful postseason.  Not a more successful season.

I’m more thinking of it from my perspective as a fan.   I weigh the regular season season pretty heavily and in most cases I’d rather win a division title than win a wildcard spot + one divisional series.   But I’d rather win a wildcard spot and then get to the World Series than win a divisional title.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Natty said:

Houston, after having 3 years playing .346, .340, and .315 ball in 2011-2013, turned it around in only 3 years to win 101 games the 4th year, 2017. Can we do that? Should Elias study what they did

I'm pretty sure Elias knows precisely what they did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Natty said:

Houston, after having 3 years playing .346, .340, and .315 ball in 2011-2013, turned it around in only 3 years to win 101 games the 4th year, 2017. Can we do that? Should Elias study what they did? 

Lower-revenue teams in the AL East, NL West or NL Central face a level of challenge in using an Astro-style extreme rebuild to move from a lousy team to winning a division title (let alone several titles consecutively) that is different from, and more imposing, the one that the Astros faced in the AL West.

If one of those lower-revenue teams follows the recipe used by the Astros, and makes some good decisions and has decent luck along the way, it should be able within four or five years to build a successful team that will compete to win the division or a wild-card spot, though probably only for a few years.

But it's a different proposition whether that will be enough to finish ahead of the higher-revenue teams -- the NYYs/Red Sox,  Cubs/Cardinals or Dodgers/Giants -- if those teams are spending more, spending it wisely, and also having pretty good (or better) luck is another question (as well as other division rivals, some of which may have been pursuing a similar rebuilding process, with comparable or greater resources). I think it's entirely possible the Orioles will competently follow the Astros' lead and have a successful rebuild without ever getting to the post-season (or doing so only once or twice as a wildcard).

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Lower-revenue teams in the AL East, NL West or NL Central face a level of challenge in using an Astro-style extreme rebuild to move from a lousy team to winning a division title (let alone several titles consecutively) that is different from, and more imposing, the one that the Astros faced in the AL West.

If one of those lower-revenue teams follows the recipe used by the Astros, and makes some good decisions and has decent luck along the way, it should be able within four or five years to build a successful team that will compete to win the division or a wild-card spot, though probably only for a few years.

But it's a different proposition whether that will be enough to finish ahead of the higher-revenue teams -- the NYYs/Red Sox,  Cubs/Cardinals or Dodgers/Giants -- if those teams are spending more, spending it wisely, and also having pretty good (or better) luck is another question (as well as other division rivals, some of which may have been pursuing a similar rebuilding process, with comparable or greater resources). I think it's entirely possible the Orioles will competently follow the Astros' lead and have a successful rebuild without ever getting to the post-season (or doing so only once or twice as a wildcard).

  

Speaking of spending money wisely...We still owe Davis $93M and we still owe Cobb $49M. That $142M puts quite the damper on spending any more money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Andy would not hire Buck.   Buck was one of the big reasons the Andy left the O's.  

Yes, there were other reason also but Buck was probably in the top three.

Seems like this may not even be Andy’s call...as owner John Middleton apparently made the call to fire Kapler, over the objection of former O employee and now GM Matt Klentak  and apparently Andy is nowhere to be heard from according to the Philly media.  If this becomes an owner reaching out to do the hire, then that would be certainly right up Buck’s wheelhouse.

Sounds like a bit of a mess in Philly right now though. 

https://www.thegoodphight.com/2019/10/8/20904348/who-do-you-trust-to-run-the-phillies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

That team lost because their bullpen imploded.    Meanwhile, Strasburg is still healthy 7 years later post-TJ, so I’m not going to say their decision was wrong.    They shut him down well before the post-season.    

Exactly.  Maybe the orioles can get Matt Harvey and Kris Medlen as they are tough guys and Strasburg is a porcelain doll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Per Roch:   For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Jordan Westburg 2B Anthony Santander RF Colton Cowser LF Adley Rutschman C Ryan O’Hearn DH Ryan Mountcastle 1B Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Cade Povich LHP For the Twins Manuel Margot RF Carlos Correa SS Byron Buxton CF Carlos Santana 1B Royce Lewis 3B Kyle Farmer 2B Ryan Jeffers DH Christian Vázquez C Willi Castro LF Pablo López RHP    
    • That would be pretty cool. Just do me a favor and please don't start the magic number thread in June next season.
    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...