Jump to content

Prospects Live 2020 Offseason Top 30 Orioles Prospects


Spl51

Recommended Posts

Just to try to get some context for their grades, I added up the “realistic” and “ceiling” grades for the top 10 players in each of the 11 systems that Prospects Live has graded so far:

SEA 525/625

SDP 515/580

CWS 490/585

CLE 490/570

KCR 480/585

BAL 480/560

MIN 470/570

ARI 465/590

ATL 455/595

MIL 435/510

BOS 430/505

So, per this site, we’re exactly in the middle among the 11 teams in terms of realistic value, but 9th/11 in ceiling.     Not really where we want to be yet.    

Two caveats:

(1) I don’t know if this group of 11 teams just happens to include more than its share of the better farm systems.    That may be the case.    

(2) I was only looking at the top 10 for each system.    I suspect our system may be a bit deeper than some, even if the top 10 is just so-so.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Mountcastle- versatile defender!!!

That's what an additional 30-45 days in '20 at AAA does for a player......

And I'd add some laughing emoji or something but I don't know how, or why, to do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The followup podcast came out today.

https://www.prospectslive.com/podcasts/2019/12/24/podcast-orioles-top-30-breakdown

Their Orioles guy gave Luke a cite  for some of his Elio Prado enthusiasm.  Among the insights that hit me as new/interesting were:

-slider perhaps Rodriguez's breaking ball, at least it was described more positively than the curve

-Frederick as a hitters paradise - I never thought of it as an extreme park

-DL Hall's control problems described as somewhat on purpose, due to the stuff he was working on.

-a lot of Baumann hype - their guy I guess saw him good everytime last summer.  From his buzz, Kremer being ranked ahead of him (and described as best player in Machado deal - it is a pessimistic Yusniel report) feels significant for this evaluator.  Due to 40-man status though, his suspicion was no Baumann until 2021.

-Gunnar graded with a double-plus arm tool.

-overall the ETA's floated hit me as way too slow (2022 in general for Adley/Grayson/Hall).  We'll see if Rutschman breaks PECOTA like Wieters did his one full year on the farm, but even if he only meets his mid-case expectations, it's still hard to picture him getting a second full year down.  Those knees only last so long.  And I hope by broad category Rodriguez/Hall fall closer to David Price than the many Tampa arms of lesser raw talent that were always held to one level per season, which may be sensible for 90% of even talented regular prospects, just not these guys please.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OrioleDog said:

The followup podcast came out today.

https://www.prospectslive.com/podcasts/2019/12/24/podcast-orioles-top-30-breakdown

Their Orioles guy gave Luke a cite  for some of his Elio Prado enthusiasm.  Among the insights that hit me as new/interesting were:

-slider perhaps Rodriguez's breaking ball, at least it was described more positively than the curve

-Frederick as a hitters paradise - I never thought of it as an extreme park

-DL Hall's control problems described as somewhat on purpose, due to the stuff he was working on.

-a lot of Baumann hype - their guy I guess saw him good everytime last summer.  From his buzz, Kremer being ranked ahead of him (and described as best player in Machado deal - it is a pessimistic Yusniel report) feels significant for this evaluator.  Due to 40-man status though, his suspicion was no Baumann until 2021.

-Gunnar graded with a double-plus arm tool.

-overall the ETA's floated hit me as way too slow (2022 in general for Adley/Grayson/Hall).  We'll see if Rutschman breaks PECOTA like Wieters did his one full year on the farm, but even if he only meets his mid-case expectations, it's still hard to picture him getting a second full year down.  Those knees only last so long.  And I hope by broad category Rodriguez/Hall fall closer to David Price than the many Tampa arms of lesser raw talent that were always held to one level per season, which may be sensible for 90% of even talented regular prospects, just not these guys please.

Elias seems to be very deliberate with promotions unless you are Cadyn Grenier.

I'm more in favor of challenging talented prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Elias seems to be very deliberate with promotions unless you are Cadyn Grenier.

I'm more in favor of challenging talented prospects.

I wouldn’t judge Elias’ tendencies too much just yet.    Last year was really a chance for him to be extremely patient and evaluate the whole organization.    I won’t be surprised if he’s a little more aggressive in year 2.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I wouldn’t judge Elias’ tendencies too much just yet.    Last year was really a chance for him to be extremely patient and evaluate the whole organization.    I won’t be surprised if he’s a little more aggressive in year 2.    

I wasn't judging him.  I stated that he seems to be very deliberate.  I think that is an accurate statement given what we saw last year.  (Stewart, Sisco, Mountcastle, Diaz, Hall, Hall, Rodriguez)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

The followup podcast came out today.

https://www.prospectslive.com/podcasts/2019/12/24/podcast-orioles-top-30-breakdown

Their Orioles guy gave Luke a cite  for some of his Elio Prado enthusiasm.  Among the insights that hit me as new/interesting were:

-slider perhaps Rodriguez's breaking ball, at least it was described more positively than the curve

-Frederick as a hitters paradise - I never thought of it as an extreme park

-DL Hall's control problems described as somewhat on purpose, due to the stuff he was working on.

-a lot of Baumann hype - their guy I guess saw him good everytime last summer.  From his buzz, Kremer being ranked ahead of him (and described as best player in Machado deal - it is a pessimistic Yusniel report) feels significant for this evaluator.  Due to 40-man status though, his suspicion was no Baumann until 2021.

-Gunnar graded with a double-plus arm tool.

-overall the ETA's floated hit me as way too slow (2022 in general for Adley/Grayson/Hall).  We'll see if Rutschman breaks PECOTA like Wieters did his one full year on the farm, but even if he only meets his mid-case expectations, it's still hard to picture him getting a second full year down.  Those knees only last so long.  And I hope by broad category Rodriguez/Hall fall closer to David Price than the many Tampa arms of lesser raw talent that were always held to one level per season, which may be sensible for 90% of even talented regular prospects, just not these guys please.

What did I say that would make someone rank Prado that highly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just searched OH and Twitter, all I've said able Prado is that I don't know much about him yet and that he reportedly has a mature approach. I hope he's not citing me on Prado.

Maybe he meant to cite me on DL Hall working on breaking/offspeed, Frederick being a hitter's park, the slider being Rodriguez's best breaking ball (although the curve has improved), or the Baumann hype. 

Those are all things I actually tweeted or wrote about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I wouldn’t judge Elias’ tendencies too much just yet.    Last year was really a chance for him to be extremely patient and evaluate the whole organization.    I won’t be surprised if he’s a little more aggressive in year 2.    

And to add the obvious, there wasn't a full compliment of Elias chosen coaches and the programs being put in place were new. 

It's reasonable to expect more progress in year 2 as you say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

And to add the obvious, there wasn't a full compliment of Elias chosen coaches and the programs being put in place were new. 

It's reasonable to expect more progress in year 2 as you say.

I don't see why it would be reasonable to expect faster promotion.  We have the data we have, I'd rather extrapolate from that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't see why it would be reasonable to expect faster promotion.  We have the data we have, I'd rather extrapolate from that. 

I’m not expecting anything.    Just not drawing any firm conclusions from the limited experience we have.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...