Jump to content

Comparing Astros/Orioles.


HowAboutThat

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, oriolediehard said:

We have some pitching prospects almost ready, that could be the difference and hope for the future.

From several interviews with Elias, hearing him talking about all the minor league arms he inherited, I think he's very surprised with the quality and numbers of good arms we really do have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, 7Mo said:

If you want to grab on to something positive, Ramon Laureano.

The Astros gave away Laureano for Brandon Bailey. Clearly a bad value trade.

Elias just picked up Bailey for a Rule 5 pick. Bailey won't need to produce a lot to justify the value.

But you're right. It's the process. It's not one trade, but a way of operating over a series of trades/picks/signings. It'll take time.

The Laureano trade was the Astros having to get something of value before they lost Laureano in the Rule 5. So they chose to get a guy like Bailey that wouldn’t be Rule 5 eligible for a few seasons. Then they lost him. 

So what can you do as a GM?  Which OF should they have released off of their 40 man for Laureano?  

It wasn’t a bad trade. Just some bad luck and this is what happens when you have a good 40 man. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎12‎/‎13‎/‎2019 at 8:49 PM, Philip said:

I find it utterly unimaginable that we cannot find a better starter, or reliever, than Hess. He must be the placeholderist of placeholders, because we just need to find arms/legs/breathing to have a better producer.

I am sure if Elias wanted to find a better pitcher and put him in an Orioles uniform and set him on the mound that Elias would do that.  Elias is tanking - he is trying to lose.  

AM did the same thing without really vocalizing it.  He would add veteran Steve Traschel and bring up AAAA types in order to watch us lose.

It is all very strange to watch - trying to put at least a competent team on the field that is designed to lose a lot and yet develop individual players to perform at their very best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hoosiers said:

I am sure if Elias wanted to find a better pitcher and put him in an Orioles uniform and set him on the mound that Elias would do that.  Elias is tanking - he is trying to lose.  

AM did the same thing without really vocalizing it.  He would add veteran Steve Traschel and bring up AAAA types in order to watch us lose.

It is all very strange to watch - trying to put at least a competent team on the field that is designed to lose a lot and yet develop individual players to perform at their very best.

My point is that even if you don’t care about terrible pitchers, you want BETTER terrible pitchers. All last season I was saying we should give a guy a chance and then send him on his way and give another guy a chance. Hess has had lots of chances and failed miserably. Send him on his way, even if the next guy isn’t better he can hardly be worse. Ynoa, Yacabonis, Brooks, Eshelman, and several others had a chance. Hess had myriad chances. I remember Hyde bringing him in in relief and wondering how long till his first homer. Never very long...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/14/2019 at 12:37 AM, scOtt said:

From several interviews with Elias, hearing him talking about all the minor league arms he inherited, I think he's very surprised with the quality and numbers of good arms we really do have.

I don't think the Orioles have had a problem drafting good arms, they just have failed to develop the talent or traded it away. Elias fixing the pitching is key to the rebuild. Buying the arms gets very expensive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I don't think the Orioles have had a problem drafting good arms, they just have failed to develop the talent or traded it away. Elias fixing the pitching is key to the rebuild. Buying the arms gets very expensive. 

 

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Houston got pretty good deals for Verlander and Cole. 

It’s fine to buy the occasional arm. But we still need to develop our share.  It looks to me like Elias is very focused on that.    And he inherited some pretty good arms in our MiL system.   The O’s had overhauled their own pitching selection and development systems in the two years before Elias arrived, after Wasdin took over as MiL pitching coordinator.   Holt seems terrific, but I think Wasdin also did a very nice job in that role.    There was a terrific article about it that I’ll try to find. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s fine to buy the occasional arm. But we still need to develop our share.  It looks to me like Elias is very focused on that.    And he inherited some pretty good arms in our MiL system.   The O’s had overhauled their own pitching selection and development systems in the two years before Elias arrived, after Wasdin took over as MiL pitching coordinator.   Holt seems terrific, but I think Wasdin also did a very nice job in that role.    There was a terrific article about it that I’ll try to find. 

It obvious the Elias prefers NCAA arms. I think he’s looking for those 5-20th round NCAA SPs that are “undervalued”. Guys that we could potentially “fix” with coaching and analytics. 

I’ve only seen Elias operate, and I can only go by what Houston’s org looks like now to try and draw a conclusion, but it looks like the thinking is to target BPA bailable bats early on in the draft versus pitching. Maybe the thinking is that the 1st & 2nd rd pitchers are so heavily scouted that there isn’t much hidden value there. Plus there’s more inherent risk with a pitcher. 

I think that Martin and Hancock are 1-2 for us. If Martin is there, that kind of fits what Houston has done recently, but I don’t think we’re passing on Hancock for Torkelson/Gonzalez. 

From a development standpoint what is easier, going to 4S/Curveball combo or completely reworking a swing and approach?  My guess what be is it’s easier to fix things with pitchers. Which leads to a theory of take the bats early and the pitchers in the mid rounds. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Wait, are you saying that it's the combined H2H? I guess that does make sense. So, in that circumstance, in a 3 way tie...the Tigers get the #4 seed, the O's #5, and Royals #6?
    • Bubic is really good. Zerpa has a pretty bad K-BB rate on the season though and gives up hard contact, so it looks like that may just be a good stretch for him. His xERA is 4.49 on the season. Lynch is solid but he’s a low K, low BB lefty. Definitely not bad, but he’s going to give up contact.  
    • Yeah, I was tracking #1 overall at some point, not next year. Unless Basallo still has rookie eligibility, I don't see anyone having a chance after next season.
    • Cano has been great since June 1st even if the last week has been rough. 11.27 K/9, 3.41 ERA, 2.56 FIP, 2.64 xFIP, 2.73 SIERA. Perez’s ERA is worse than last year but his K-BB rate, FIP, and xERA are all better than last year, while his xFIP is slightly worse. I don’t feel notably different about those two this year than heading into the playoffs last year. If anything, having Cano as a 7th/8th inning option instead of the closer like last year is probably better.  The pen isn’t great but I don’t think it’s that bad. Cano, Perez, Soto, Dominguez, Coulombe, Webb, and Akin have combined for a 3.37 ERA and 9.81 K/9 this year with the O’s. They’re missing a go to back end guy (which is evident when pitching to guys like Judge and Soto) but they have a number of solid options that can strike guys out. Guys like Kimbrel, Irvin, Baker, Smith, Tate, Ramirez, and Heasley really hurt the overall bullpen ERA and they won’t be pitching in the playoffs. I’m definitely taking them over KC’s pen and I’m not sure it’s that much worse than any other AL playoff team’s besides Cleveland. 
    • Your conclusions are 100% correct, but it has nothing to do with division records in that 3 way tie It is head to head results among the tied teams: 1) Det 10-9 (4-2 vs Balt, 6-7 vs KC) 2) Balt 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det) 3) KC 9-10 (2-4 vs Balt, 7-6 vs Det)
    • I assumed the OP meant next year.  I don't think there's anyone on the international side who has a chance at this point to blow up that quickly.  I agree that if we're looking beyond just next year then yes, that's more likely.
    • You are wrong. If Detroit wins out and the Orioles are swept (and KC doesn't sweep), we fall to the #2 wild card due to our tiebreak loss to Detroit head to head.  Detroit is the #1 wild card in that case.  We are the #2 wild card.   If KC wins 1 or 2, they are the #3 wild card, otherwise Minnesota is the #3 wild card. If Detroit wins out AND KC wins out and we are swept, it is a 3 way tie for the 3 wild card spots.   Based on head to head among tied teams, we are 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det), KC is 9-10 (2-4 vs us, 7-6 vs Det), and Det is 10-9 (4-2 vs us, 6-7 vs KC).   So Det is the #1, we are the #2, and KC is the #3. So to be the #1 wild card and get home field Tuesday, we need either one win or one Detroit loss.   KC's results are irrelevant to whether we get the #1 spot or not, although they could jump us and Detroit by winning out if we lose out and Det wins out.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...