Jump to content

Should we go after Andrew Cashner?


BamaOsFan

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

I understand what you're saying, but I just threw up in my mouth a bit looking at the list of remaining free agent SPs. Why waste the money on any of these retreads? 

 

Alex Wood SP 29 CIN TBD -   - -0.3  
Ivan Nova SP 33 CHW TBD -   - 2.12  
C.C. Sabathia SP 39 NYY TBD -   - 0.37  
Jason Vargas SP 37 PHI TBD -   - 1.62  
Drew Smyly SP 31 PHI TBD -   - -0.68  
Taijuan Walker SP 27 ARI TBD -   - 0.05  
Danny Salazar SP 30 CLE TBD -   - 0.08  
Chad Bettis SP 31 COL TBD -   - -0.15  
Clay Buchholz SP 35 TOR TBD -   - -0.33  
J.C. Ramirez SP 31 LAA TBD -   - 0.06  
Erasmo Ramirez SP 30 BOS TBD -   - -0.08  
Ervin Santana SP 37 NYM TBD -   - -0.4  
Jerad Eickhoff SP 29 PHI TBD -   - -0.05  
Allen Webster SP 30 CHC TBD -   - -0.05  
Cody Anderson SP 29 CLE TBD -   - -0.62  
Dan Straily SP 31 PHI TBD -   - -1.3  
Aaron Brooks SP 30 BAL TBD -   - 0.06  
Jacob Nix SP 24 SD TBD -   -    
Tom Milone SP 33 SEA TBD -   - 1.32  
Felipe Paulino SP 36 HOU TBD -   -    
Edwin Jackson SP 36 DET TBD -   - -1.54  
Ryan Feierabend SP 34 TOR TBD -   - -0.24  
Tayler Scott SP 28 BAL TBD -   - -0.26  
Gabriel Ynoa SP 27 BAL TBD -   - 0.06  
Rookie Davis SP 27 PIT TBD -   - -0.05  
Aaron Slegers SP 27 TB TBD -   - 0.04  
Henderson Alvarez SP 30 WSH TBD -   -    
Brandon Beachy SP 33 SF TBD -   -    
Ricky Nolasco SP 37 ARI TBD -   -    
Drew Hutchison SP 29 LAA TBD -   -    
Shelby Miller SP 29 MIL TBD -   - -1  
Rubby De La Rosa SP 31 ARI TBD -   -  

I don’t see Tillman on your list!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, esmd said:

Meh.  As was said, I'd rather through a ton of cheap, young, "lottery ticket" type guys out there than pay money to a veteran like Cashner who would be nothing but a mediocre-at-best placeholder.

The problem with going through “young pitching” is that we did that last year and only Means stood out. I think we’ll pick someone up on a milb deal. We already got lucky with Cashner to be able to trade him at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, esmd said:

Meh.  As was said, I'd rather through a ton of cheap, young, "lottery ticket" type guys out there than pay money to a veteran like Cashner who would be nothing but a mediocre-at-best placeholder.

Throwing out a parade of young "who-knows" types will get you a whole lot of early exits. That leads to a whole lot of long relief appearances. This loads up the AAA/AA shuttle (already busy ferrying starters) with long relievers, makes establishing defined bullpen roles difficult/impossible, and forces Hyde to manage defensively instead of being able to put guys in spots where they're most likely to succeed. Failing to bring in Cashner or an innings eater like him could very likely result in a no-or-negative rebuild progress season, at least as far as pitching is concerned. There'll be plenty of opportunities for the lottery ticket types regardless.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, wildbillhiccup said:

I understand what you're saying, but I just threw up in my mouth a bit looking at the list of remaining free agent SPs. Why waste the money on any of these retreads? 

 

Alex Wood SP 29 CIN TBD -   - -0.3  
Ivan Nova SP 33 CHW TBD -   - 2.12  
C.C. Sabathia SP 39 NYY TBD -   - 0.37  
Jason Vargas SP 37 PHI TBD -   - 1.62  
Drew Smyly SP 31 PHI TBD -   - -0.68  
Taijuan Walker SP 27 ARI TBD -   - 0.05  
Danny Salazar SP 30 CLE TBD -   - 0.08  
Chad Bettis SP 31 COL TBD -   - -0.15  
Clay Buchholz SP 35 TOR TBD -   - -0.33  
J.C. Ramirez SP 31 LAA TBD -   - 0.06  
Erasmo Ramirez SP 30 BOS TBD -   - -0.08  
Ervin Santana SP 37 NYM TBD -   - -0.4  
Jerad Eickhoff SP 29 PHI TBD -   - -0.05  
Allen Webster SP 30 CHC TBD -   - -0.05  
Cody Anderson SP 29 CLE TBD -   - -0.62  
Dan Straily SP 31 PHI TBD -   - -1.3  
Aaron Brooks SP 30 BAL TBD -   - 0.06  
Jacob Nix SP 24 SD TBD -   -    
Tom Milone SP 33 SEA TBD -   - 1.32  
Felipe Paulino SP 36 HOU TBD -   -    
Edwin Jackson SP 36 DET TBD -   - -1.54  
Ryan Feierabend SP 34 TOR TBD -   - -0.24  
Tayler Scott SP 28 BAL TBD -   - -0.26  
Gabriel Ynoa SP 27 BAL TBD -   - 0.06  
Rookie Davis SP 27 PIT TBD -   - -0.05  
Aaron Slegers SP 27 TB TBD -   - 0.04  
Henderson Alvarez SP 30 WSH TBD -   -    
Brandon Beachy SP 33 SF TBD -   -    
Ricky Nolasco SP 37 ARI TBD -   -    
Drew Hutchison SP 29 LAA TBD -   -    
Shelby Miller SP 29 MIL TBD -   - -1  
Rubby De La Rosa SP 31 ARI TBD -   -  

Many of those players are retired or pitching in Asia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/10/2020 at 10:02 AM, beervendor said:

Throwing out a parade of young "who-knows" types will get you a whole lot of early exits. That leads to a whole lot of long relief appearances. This loads up the AAA/AA shuttle (already busy ferrying starters) with long relievers, makes establishing defined bullpen roles difficult/impossible, and forces Hyde to manage defensively instead of being able to put guys in spots where they're most likely to succeed. Failing to bring in Cashner or an innings eater like him could very likely result in a no-or-negative rebuild progress season, at least as far as pitching is concerned. There'll be plenty of opportunities for the lottery ticket types regardless.

You assume that won't happen anyway with Cashner.  He's not good.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Interesting choice. Is he even guaranteed a rotation spot? 1) Kershaw 2) Buehler 3) Maeda 4) Urias 5) Nelson (with May and/or Stripling possibly 6th starters)

Teams like the Dodgers go into the season with 7-8 options for the rotations, plus milb depth, plus whatever prospects are on the horizon.  

It would be nice to see us sign Cashner on an Iglesias type contract, just to provide a bridge to our prospects in AAA/AA.  I wouldn't count on Cobb being healthy or productive.  He's earned those expectations.  I think Cashner is somewhere in between the pitcher he was for us in the first half of the season versus what he was in BOS.  I have no expectations of him performing well us flipping him.  He'd just provide some stability, and he's been pretty durable recently.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Teams like the Dodgers go into the season with 7-8 options for the rotations, plus milb depth, plus whatever prospects are on the horizon.  

It would be nice to see us sign Cashner on an Iglesias type contract, just to provide a bridge to our prospects in AAA/AA.  I wouldn't count on Cobb being healthy or productive.  He's earned those expectations.  I think Cashner is somewhere in between the pitcher he was for us in the first half of the season versus what he was in BOS.  I have no expectations of him performing well us flipping him.  He'd just provide some stability, and he's been pretty durable recently.  

I hear ya, but I'd really prefer not to retread the same inefficient starter. That's also why i wanted no part of the Tillman comeback. If they're going to sign someone, pick someone with upside and preferably without a mullet. Tajuan Walker or bust. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, esmd said:

You assume that won't happen anyway with Cashner.  He's not good.

Oh it certainly could, but he was pretty good for us quite recently. And he doesn't have to be good, just serviceable. I think the upside of Cashner putting up 180+IP outweighs the likelihood of him underperforming our second best rule V arm, or whomever we find to fill the 2nd or 3rd avail SP slot. A lot like our elections - there are no good choices, you just hope to end up with the least bad option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they will sign one or two guys off that list as a reclaimation project type.  someone that wil get low base salary with incentives in the deal on inning pitched.  Walker has the most upside but a huge injury risk. I liked Wood and Salazar has had decent years but another injury/health risk.  Chad Bettis maybe a safe pick been pretty healthy and his numbers outside of Coors the last few years are not bad with low 4 ERA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...