Jump to content

Should we go after Andrew Cashner?


BamaOsFan

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, murph said:

Why not?   This year doesn’t matter. Need innings eaten. Might get a young international (or two!) prospect at the deadline if Andrew has a lucky first half again. 

Cause I hate watching him pitch?  

And "innings eaten" is a myth.  Dude hardly makes it past the 5th, barely makes it into the 6th.  Has never cracked 200 innings, hasn't come particularly close since his career high in innings which he achieved in 2015.  Would be hard pressed to get 150 innings out of him, 175 innings would be amazing.  He'd be part of the reason the bullpen is blown out and depleted by June.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Cause I hate watching him pitch?  

And "innings eaten" is a myth.  Dude hardly makes it past the 5th, barely makes it into the 6th.  Has never cracked 200 innings, hasn't come particularly close since his career high in innings which he achieved in 2015.  Would be hard pressed to get 150 innings out of him, 175 innings would be amazing.  He'd be part of the reason the bullpen is blown out and depleted by June.  

We need “quality” innings form someone.  Cashner gave us that for half a season.   What makes you think, I think a 5 inning average is not an innings eater on the 2020 Orioles?   
 

I think the bullpen will be depleted by June with or without him. 
 

Don’t really care either way.   But definitely think, why not? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, murph said:

We need “quality” innings form someone.  Cashner gave us that for half a season.   What makes you think, I think a 5 inning average is not an innings eater on the 2020 Orioles?   
 

I think the bullpen will be depleted by June with or without him. 
 

Don’t really care either way.   But definitely think, why not? 

I'd rather see it from someone else.  As I said, I hate watching him pitch.  I will grant you that he wasn't that bad last year, Brocail seems to have some kind of positive impact on him.  Maybe that's real, maybe that's a coincidence. 

I disagree with your earlier statement that this year doesn't matter.  It matters a lot.  This is the year where some of the guys in the minors need to step up and make a name for themselves at the big league level.  That they can be a part of the next winning team in Baltimore.  

Cashner sort of gets in the way of that.  And if you're bringing him back with an eye on trading him again halfway through the summer for organizational filler...I'm not sure why you work to sign him in the first place.  I don't see how he fits in any capacity, really.   If you're saying he holds down a rotation spot until Akin or Kremer is ready...fine, I guess.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Cause I hate watching him pitch?  

And "innings eaten" is a myth.  Dude hardly makes it past the 5th, barely makes it into the 6th.  Has never cracked 200 innings, hasn't come particularly close since his career high in innings which he achieved in 2015.  Would be hard pressed to get 150 innings out of him, 175 innings would be amazing.  He'd be part of the reason the bullpen is blown out and depleted by June.  

You hate watching him pitch more than some scrub they'll get off waivers?

Looking at the Orioles system, I do not see anyone he'd be realistically blocking for the first half of the year. He'll be affordable and he'll help Hyde actually be able to put some of the young guys in spots where they can succeed. Given Cobb's injury history, analytical consensus that Means will absolutely regress in 2020, and the loss of Bundy - this team needs a veteran who can get them to the 5th inning.

It's not sexy. But, a Cashner-type guy is exactly what this not-sexy team needs. Elias has to give Hyde something to work with.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Chewbacca Jr. said:

You hate watching him pitch more than some scrub they'll get off waivers?

Looking at the Orioles system, I do not see anyone he'd be realistically blocking for the first half of the year. He'll be affordable and he'll help Hyde actually be able to put some of the young guys in spots where they can succeed. Given Cobb's injury history, analytical consensus that Means will absolutely regress in 2020, and the loss of Bundy - this team needs a veteran who can get them to the 5th inning.

It's not sexy. But, a Cashner-type guy is exactly what this not-sexy team needs. Elias has to give Hyde something to work with.

I don't hate watching him any more than some scrub that they'd get off waivers.

So go get a scrub off waivers.  

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Chewbacca Jr. said:

You hate watching him pitch more than some scrub they'll get off waivers

Actually, I don’t mind at all giving a chance to scrubs. I HATE giving four year chances to Mike Wright and his ilk, but I’m happy to give opportunities to guys who might have something to offer. Not long ones, mind you, but a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Philip said:

Actually, I don’t mind at all giving a chance to scrubs. I HATE giving four year chances to Mike Wright and his ilk, but I’m happy to give opportunities to guys who might have something to offer. Not long ones, mind you, but a chance.

I'd prefer it, too, honestly.  Like I'm not thrilled about having to get scrubs to pitch...but, IMO, Cashner is a scrub.  He's just a scrub with name recognition.  Maybe with some quad A type, you get a guy who could be a pleasant surprise.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Philip said:

Actually, I don’t mind at all giving a chance to scrubs. I HATE giving four year chances to Mike Wright and his ilk, but I’m happy to give opportunities to guys who might have something to offer. Not long ones, mind you, but a chance.

So some other team's Mike Wright is better than the one they already have?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

So some other team's Mike Wright is better than the one they already have?

Well, yeah, because there's the potential that our methods coax more out of the player. With Mike Wright, we know our methods aren't working, it's a closed case. There's always more opportunity with another team's player. 

Shawn Armstrong is a great example. He was Seattle's Mike Wright. He comes here and, yeah, doesn't set the world on fire, but we certainly got more out of him than Seattle has. He's analytics-friendly and he confirmed exactly what Luke hoped he'd work on in the offseason. Career high K-rate as an Oriole and a 4.28 FIP. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

I'd prefer it, too, honestly.  Like I'm not thrilled about having to get scrubs to pitch...but, IMO, Cashner is a scrub.  He's just a scrub with name recognition.  Maybe with some quad A type, you get a guy who could be a pleasant surprise.  

Unfair to call him a scrub. The O's actually started plenty of scrubs last year:

Sean Gilmartin: 1 GS / 2.1 IP / 19.29 ERA / 3.857 WHIP

Yefry Ramirez: 1 GS / 10.1 IP / 6.97 ERA / 1.935 WHIP

Chandler Shepherd: 3 GS / 19 IP / 6.63 ERA / 1.526 WHIP

Tom Eshelman: 4 GS / 36 IP / 6.50 ERA / 1.611 WHIP

Jimmy Yacabonis: 4 GS / 41 IP / 6.80 ERA / 1.829 WHIP

Ty Blach: 5 GS / 20.2 IP / 11.32 ERA / 2.177 WHIP

Dan Straily: 8 GS / 47.2 IP / 9.82 ERA / 1.993 WHIP

Aaron Brooks: 12 GS / 59.2 IP / 6.18 ERA / 1.492 WHIP

David Hess: 14 GS / 80 IP / 7.09 ERA / 1.550 WHIP

 

and... Andrew Cashner: 17 GS / 96.1 IP / 3.83 ERA / 1.194 WHIP.

 

Bundy is gone. Cobb is injury-prone. There will be other injuries. Cashner or someone similar to him is something the O's need to get through the 2020 season. There will be plenty of opportunities for the waiver-wire scrubs with a 1 in a 1,000 chance of being a surprise. Elias certainly didn't have any luck with that last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Chewbacca Jr. said:

Unfair to call him a scrub. The O's actually started plenty of scrubs last year:

Sean Gilmartin: 1 GS / 2.1 IP / 19.29 ERA / 3.857 WHIP

Yefry Ramirez: 1 GS / 10.1 IP / 6.97 ERA / 1.935 WHIP

Chandler Shepherd: 3 GS / 19 IP / 6.63 ERA / 1.526 WHIP

Tom Eshelman: 4 GS / 36 IP / 6.50 ERA / 1.611 WHIP

Jimmy Yacabonis: 4 GS / 41 IP / 6.80 ERA / 1.829 WHIP

Ty Blach: 5 GS / 20.2 IP / 11.32 ERA / 2.177 WHIP

Dan Straily: 8 GS / 47.2 IP / 9.82 ERA / 1.993 WHIP

Aaron Brooks: 12 GS / 59.2 IP / 6.18 ERA / 1.492 WHIP

David Hess: 14 GS / 80 IP / 7.09 ERA / 1.550 WHIP

 

and... Andrew Cashner: 17 GS / 96.1 IP / 3.83 ERA / 1.194 WHIP.

 

Bundy is gone. Cobb is injury-prone. There will be other injuries. Cashner or someone similar to him is something the O's need to get through the 2020 season. There will be plenty of opportunities for the waiver-wire scrubs with a 1 in a 1,000 chance of being a surprise. Elias certainly didn't have any luck with that last year.

I'm going to assume you do recognize that what Cashner did here last year wasn't in line with the rest of his career.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

 

I disagree with your earlier statement that this year doesn't matter.  It matters a lot.  This is the year where some of the guys in the minors need to step up and make a name for themselves at the big league level.  That they can be a part of the next winning team in Baltimore.  

 

I meant in terms of wins and losses, definitely do not want him blocking any of our young pitchers and if you think Akin/Kremer will get less innings because of a Cashner signing, then I am completely with you.  

I didn't mind watching him pitch, seemed like his fastball had good movement and he had decent command of it.  I know we won't get 2.7 bWar out him again, but a 4.5ERA and a win might not be too much to ask. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...