Jump to content

An argument to keep Patterson in 08


biggrthngibbons

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 132
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If they are about the same over all why not keep Payton for another year rather than trying to extend CPat. I doubt that you get CPat for less tha 5M.

Cause they really aren't.

CPat is much faster, has more power and is by far the surperior defender.

He also has more potential and upside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boras will have nothing to do with it if it is an arbitration type thing.

Better chance, as of right now, that CPat would accept a one year deal and try and re-establish his value than anything else.

I think CPat would be more interested in a decent multi-year deal that guaranteed him respectable $. I would be skeptical that CPat goes for a one year deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

giving C-Pat 5 mil a year isnt too bad, his defense is great, i was hoping we could pick up Torii Hunter but it might be better to hold on to Corey, I think we get more bang for our buck so to speak, we should try to hold on to C-Pat

our priority should be to get rid of dead weight, and IMO C-pat doesnt fall into that category

Link to comment
Share on other sites

giving C-Pat 5 mil a year isnt too bad, his defense is great, i was hoping we could pick up Torii Hunter but it might be better to hold on to Corey, I think we get more bang for our buck so to speak, we should try to hold on to C-Pat

our priority should be to get rid of dead weight, and IMO C-pat doesnt fall into that category

Although SG may be right in saying that he will take a one year deal to reestablish his value, I think signing him to 2/11 with an option on the third year doesn't seem unreasonable for either side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although SG may be right in saying that he will take a one year deal to reestablish his value, I think signing him to 2/11 with an option on the third year doesn't seem unreasonable for either side.
No. No. No. As I said before, you'd be creating a Gibbons II situation. Put Markakis in centerfield before thinking about wasting money on Patterson.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think CPat would be more interested in a decent multi-year deal that guaranteed him respectable $. I would be skeptical that CPat goes for a one year deal.

With his decline from 2006 and the amount of CFers on the market I think he'd take a one year deal to get back out on the market in 2009 where there would not be as many CFers for teams to choose from. This team can use Patterson for one more year. MacPhail supposedly likes Patterson too so I see a one year deal as a possiblity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With his decline from 2006 and the amount of CFers on the market I think he'd take a one year deal to get back out on the market in 2009 where there would not be as many CFers for teams to choose from. This team can use Patterson for one more year. MacPhail supposedly likes Patterson too so I see a one year deal as a possiblity.

Yea, i agree with this.

CPat is playing better now and he may very well take off in the second half and get much more than a 1 year deal.

That being said, as of today, i don't think he hesitates to sign a 1 year tender offer to try and up his value and be in a different CF market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. No. No. As I said before, you'd be creating a Gibbons II situation. Put Markakis in centerfield before thinking about wasting money on Patterson.

If by Gibbons II you mean Gibbons I + speed + centerfield defense + bunting + 2 or three years younger + no dramatic weight loss + not looking completely lost at the plate, than I agree with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. No. No. As I said before, you'd be creating a Gibbons II situation. Put Markakis in centerfield before thinking about wasting money on Patterson.

I'm with you Tony.

The question I always come back to is, "will this guy be a big contributor on the next O's contender?"

I have a very hard time answering "yes" to that question when the subject is Corey Patterson. He's shown more than enough to establish that he's not the future in CF.

Might as well get started trying to find the guy who is the future sooner rather than later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with you Tony.

The question I always come back to is, "will this guy be a big contributor on the next O's contender?"

I have a very hard time answering "yes" to that question when the subject is Corey Patterson. He's shown more than enough to establish that he's not the future in CF.

Might as well get started trying to find the guy who is the future sooner rather than later.

If this were a smart team, i would agree with you.

But its not and the bottom line is they are much more likely to throw stupid money at Torii Hunter or A Jones than go out and trade for a young CFer with good upside or something like that.

Since that is what they ar elikely to do, i would rather them bring CPat back for another year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, basically this, that Westburg's underlying numbers (EV, barrel %, xwOBA) seem to point at this being pretty real, or at least that there's nothing 'undeserved / lucky' about this hot streak, if it's just that. 
    • The problem with a Cowser/Kjerstad/Stowers/Bradfield outfield roster is there are no right handers to handle LHP. I don't think and completely left handed outfield is the destination for an organization the values versatility.
    • Looks maybe concussion related. 
    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...