Jump to content

Attention Chris Davis


SteveA

Recommended Posts

Just now, Il BuonO said:

Lol, athleticism, shape. Not that hard. Don’t overthink it.

You can be in shape, you know, low body fat, nice muscle mass, good cardiovascular health, and still be clumsy and nonathletic. 

I used to be in good shape when I was in the service, I was still crap at sports because I'm uncoordinated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

You can be in shape, you know, low body fat, nice muscle mass, good cardiovascular health, and still be clumsy and nonathletic. 

I used to be in good shape when I was in the service, I was still crap at sports because I'm uncoordinated.

Chris Davis. Well paid professional athlete. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

What makes you think he can do the same?

Well if a former 1-1 pick who was considered a generational talent and has developed into a perennial all star and MVP candidate (and is still in his prime years) can do it, then surely anyone can

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Il BuonO said:

I disagree, he didn’t. He’s not good at bunting.

I agree he is not good at bunting. That said, he did place one well when he tried bunting. He was still thrown out. 

I am confused by your opinion regarding Davis bunting. Do you think Davis is a bad bunter, but that he should be bunting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, El_Duderino said:

No offense to you. But to think he is going to be anything other than sub replacement is delusional. He has been the worst player in baseball for three years now. What else does anyone need to see?

That’s all well and good. It doesn’t make these types of posts anymore needed. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Gatoriole said:

I agree he is not good at bunting. That said, he did place one well when he tried bunting. He was still thrown out. 

I am confused by your opinion regarding Davis bunting. Do you think Davis is a bad bunter, but that he should be bunting?

One? Lol, ok. He got one down, so end the experiment? 
 

Look, he should have been working on it so it was in his tool bag. Much like his failure to make adjustments in his approach I don’t think he’s worked at it enough. It’s not so hard that he couldn’t make minimal improvements where there would be benefits. 
 

Davis claimed he had worked hard trying things the off-season before last, remember?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Il BuonO said:

One? Lol, ok. He got one down, so end the experiment? 
 

Look, he should have been working on it so it was in his tool bag. Much like his failure to make adjustments in his approach I don’t think he’s worked at it enough. It’s not so hard that he couldn’t make minimal improvements where there would be benefits. 
 

Davis claimed he had worked hard trying things the off-season before last, remember?

I still don't follow your point. He tried bunting more than once. He only placed one well. If you watched it was fairly apparent that bunting was not a good strategy for him. He did not look comfortable, did not place the ball well often enough, and when he finally placed a bunt well, he was still thrown out. 

You state that he isn't a good bunter. I assume that is based on some combination of the above. 

What is your point in this rant? That he isn't a good bunter, but he should be? That he would be a good bunter if he worked at bunting more?

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gatoriole said:

I still don't follow your point. He tried bunting more than once. He only placed one well. If you watched it was fairly apparent that bunting was not a good strategy for him. He did not look comfortable, did not place the ball well often enough, and when he finally placed a bunt well, he was still thrown out. 

You state that he isn't a good bunter. I assume that is based on some combination of the above. 

What is your point in this rant? That he isn't a good bunter, but he should be? That he would be a good bunter if he worked at bunting more?

Calm down. I’ve hardly been ranting. I gave you a detailed explanation and you still don’t get it. So be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • HEY YANKEES! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnxNRPy_SOA
    • Yeah I'm all for sportsmanship but seeing 'Congratulations Yankees' at or near the top of the board is sickening, not gonna lie.  There is no high road when it comes to these clowns.  Boone's constant whining, the well-documented HP ump favoritism (I don't care if its framing or whatever, its happening, and its annoying AF), the whining about Judge getting hit on the hand while their guys constantly pitch inside including of course the Kjerstad play where they were literally cutting up on the bench as he lay prone on home plate, the ginormous payroll, the incredibly entitled fan base booing at pitches being called balls that are three inches off the plate, that stupid roll call, that stupid whistle after strikeouts, the stupid national media drooling over a Judge v Ohtani WS possibility, Nestor Cortes and his dumb mustache, the mediocre stadium that is revered simply because its called Yankee Stadium, the ridiculously short RF porch, the Soto Shuffle or whatever the hell it is. Congratulations my ass.  Screw those dudes.
    • Here's the deal. I doubt anyone on the Yankee's board congradulated us last year. This year they won the East. Whippie for them. It's like saying the IRS won tax season. IF, we do anything in the playoffs, we may meet again. But there are some significant hurdles before that. And they could easily lose along the way. Cleveland, Houston, Detroit, and KC are no walk in the park. I'll root for the O's to go as far as they can and that the Yankees are one and done. We are in. I hope we win one more so we play the opening round in Oriole Park. If not, we are still in and have to do what we got to do to go anywhere. Two years in a row. While the Red Sox, Blue Jays, and Tampa sleep. Year two with a heck of a lot more obstacles. This may not be a WS year but we are competitive, young, and a hell of a lot classier than that bunch in the Bronx. 
    • The usage of Cano last night was poor, I don't even blame him really.  Yankees had 9-1-2 coming up, and Torres is well known (based on the telecast) to hit Cano well, and hit sinkers well.  He laced that hit to RF off him on Tuesday where the Yanks screwed up the baserunning.  And Soto got a hit off him that same inning.  So it was pretty predictable that these guys were going to tee off when he came in, and that's exactly what happened. Not to mention he's pitched a lot recently, and Burnes should have pitched another inning anyway.  Just baffling decisions by Hyde last night, and I'm not one to generally question those types of things.  Even if the Burnes thing was pre-ordained, the choice of Cano for that moment was terrible.
    • Why is this thread on the Oriole Talk section.    It probably does not belong on the OriolesHangout  at all but if it stays it should be on the MLB section.
    • If there's two outs and its not Judge in the hole, I'm probably going with Perez, crossing my fingers he gets the lefty, and then starting fresh the next inning with Coulombe or someone else.  If there's one out, I'm going w/ Coulombe.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...