Jump to content

Nelson Cruz is 40...


HowAboutThat

Recommended Posts

Not often you have a top comp at 29 of Ryan Ludwick, and at 39 it's Frank Howard.  He's 5th all time in homers from 35-39, behind Bonds, Aaron, Ruth, and Raffy.  Tied for 739th all time in homers through age 29.  9th among players in their 30s.  Had fewer homers in his 20s than Rafeal Furcal or Jonathan Villar, more than Reggie, Harmon Killebrew, Ted Williams or Frank Robinson in his 30s.

I'm going to try to move on from "this can't be natural" to "I hope he plays until he's 55".  I know it's very unlikely with career earnings of $111M, but I'd love to see him hitting 27 homers for some indy league team in 2032.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worst move of the last decade for the O's was to let this man walk. And then sign Davis (now I am unsure, maybe Cruz was the second worst move). They put a chip on  Nelson's shoulder for sure. I am sure this has served as motivation for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Uli2001 said:

Worst move of the last decade for the O's was to let this man walk. And then sign Davis (now I am unsure, maybe Cruz was the second worst move). They put a chip on  Nelson's shoulder for sure. I am sure this has served as motivation for him.

I don't think that's what driving.him.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/31/2020 at 9:22 AM, DrungoHazewood said:

Not often you have a top comp at 29 of Ryan Ludwick, and at 39 it's Frank Howard.  He's 5th all time in homers from 35-39, behind Bonds, Aaron, Ruth, and Raffy.  Tied for 739th all time in homers through age 29.  9th among players in their 30s.  Had fewer homers in his 20s than Rafeal Furcal or Jonathan Villar, more than Reggie, Harmon Killebrew, Ted Williams or Frank Robinson in his 30s.

I'm going to try to move on from "this can't be natural" to "I hope he plays until he's 55".  I know it's very unlikely with career earnings of $111M, but I'd love to see him hitting 27 homers for some indy league team in 2032.

While this is true, Ted Williams left for Korea - where, incredibly, he was John Glenn's wing man - after 6 games in 1952.  He returned for the final 37 games of 1953.  He hit 13 HRs in those 37 games.  Gotta think he would have hit a good number of home runs had he played full seasons in 1952-53.  And, of course, missing 3 full seasons during his 20's to serve in World War II undoubtedly cost his career stats big time.  Hard to believe the man put up the huge career numbers that he did despite missing the bulk of 5 seasons to serve his country.  Truly a great player.

screen-shot-2016-12-09-at-12-01-45-pm.jpg?w=779&h=431&crop=1

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Uli2001 said:

Not what is solely driving him, but it's part. The man deserved an extension.

And he was offered one.

From all I've seen the O's offered him three years.  They hardly insulted him.  I've not heard of him harboring any ill will the O's only offered three years.  Have you?

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Uli2001 said:

The man deserved an extension.

By bb-ref's figuring Cruz' most similar player at age 32 was Henry Rodriguez.  At 33 it was Gus Zernial.  At 34 Kevin Mitchell.  Rodriguez played his last MLB game at 34.  Zernial was worth about win below replacement in his age 34-36 seasons then retired.  Kevin Mitchell was worth 0 WAR from 34 to the end of his career.

I don't know about any deserved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

And he was offered one.

From all I've seen the O's offered him three years.  They hardly insulted him.  I've not heard of him harboring any ill will the O's only offered three years.  Have you?

At the end of the day, the message is "we don't believe you have more than three productive years in you." They let him walk. Cruz is too classy to go the media complain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like fan banter too, but come on, that was an awful call by the Orioles. You may say that hindsight is 20/20, but it was awful and you know it. It was the first of a series of bad calls following their peak in 2014. It was downhill from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Uli2001 said:

I like fan banter too, but come on, that was an awful call by the Orioles. You may say that hindsight is 20/20, but it was awful and you know it. It was the first of a series of bad calls following their peak in 2014. It was downhill from there.

It's completely a hindsight call. 

The VAST majority of players that had similar careers up to that point went on to do little else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I think at $5 million he's an insurance policy that can go to the pen if need be. I'd rather not go into spring training with him penciled into the rotation. But I also don't want Trevor Rogers penciled in either.  He also could be a bridge until Bradish is ready.
    • So to all of you saying you would bring him back…. GRod, Eflin, Kremer, Felix, DC, Webb, Soto, Dominguez, Akin and Cano That leaves room for 3 more pitchers and this doesn’t include McDermott, Rogers or Povich. 3 spots left, 1 high end reliever and 2 starters. Which of those 3 spots do you want him at or, who do you take off the above list and keep Suarez over?
    • I went to a few games this year, but here are the reasons I didn't go to the WC games: The team had been an absolute bummer to watch for 3 entire months out of the season and to be honest by the time the playoffs got here I was exhausted and annoyed. The brand of baseball they had been employing for half the season (over-reliance on the home run, terrible ABs, iffy defense) frankly sucked to watch, even on TV, and I'm already spending money to watch them on TV. I wanted them to prove they could get past the WC round before I shelled out more money. I imagine a lot of people share these reasons with me. 
    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...