Jump to content

Excellent article on Bedard


Recommended Posts


Something we didn't know:

"If I can't pitch, I guess it'll be time to find reality, find a 9-to-5 job in the real world.

"I love the game. If I'm not playing it, I watch it. I'm one of the few guys I know who goes home in October and watches playoff games -- that's how much I love this game."

And a little insight on labrum injuries that is useful the next time we're questioning why surgery on player X wasn't done sooner:

"We knew what it was after the MRI. Surgery was always an option, but you want it to be the last option. You're never 100 per cent sure what'll happen in surgery."

Team doctors, trainers and Bédard agreed to try rehabilitation as the first option, and Bédard began a long, slow climb back to throwing off the mound.

"He played long toss, then shortened the distance and increased the intensity," Griffin said. "He probably threw in the bullpen four or five times. For two months, Erik did everything we asked."

The problem was, Bédard didn't improve enough.

"We tried rehab, and it got better, but it never got good. The pain was less at times, but I always felt it," Bédard said.

This week, the team and its medical staff agreed about the severity of Bédard's injury, and shoulder surgery has been scheduled for Sept. 26.

Why wasn't it done in July?

"Surgery on the labrum is the last option, not the first," Griffin said. "A lot of pitchers have labrum issues, and you might change their mechanics, move them from starting to relieving, try to strengthen it through rehab.

"When you do surgery, you don't know what you're going to find. MRIs give you an idea, but never the complete picture. With that kind of surgery, you're talking anywhere from six to 12 months of rehab before a pitcher can pitch again."

Best-case scenario, Bédard might begin throwing late in spring training. He could miss the entire 2009 season.

Worst-case scenario, the damage is career-ending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Works for me,  as long as the first piece is a Norby type!  Only one of Ortiz/Westburg/Cowser/Kjerstad should be traded for Cease.  Let them pick one of them and a couple in the 8-15 range then a lottery pick or two if needed.  But giving up 2 of those is to pricy for the return.  I like Cease, but personally value him as a very solid #3 starter.  Sure, he COULD perform better than that,  but I wouldn't bet on it.  Maybe he reverts back to his 2022 form, but I think it more likely that what we get is what we saw from him in 2023, with an improvement in numbers due to the defense behind him. 
    • Exited about this kid and the future of our international signings. We have to remember the initial reporting don’t mean a whole lot. We’ve had success in the 100-500 k range too.
    • Downtown restaurants should like this too.  Much better for any local entertainment venues.
    • Cease is a solid MLB starting pitcher with 2 years of control  who's team has clearly made it known that he's available.  Of course there is a lot of interest.  There is a lot of interest in the Orioles' prospects, as well.  Fans of both teams are hopeful that their team will get maximum value for their assets in any trade.  I'm sure that it is sometimes difficult for GMs to reach a meeting of the minds on a player's value, in which case they need to work out a restructure of the discussed deal that may not include that player.  I think Elias' opinion on Ortiz is likely to be pretty close to what posters on this site are telling you.  If the White Sox GM views Ortiz as you do, it would seem that a deal between the two teams would most likely not have Ortiz included.  I'm sure that isn't all that unusual and the GMs just turn the page and look at working out a trade involving other players/prospects.  What confuses me is that you seem to rate Ortiz lower than we do and lower than the various sites rate him, but would like a trade of Cease for Cowser and Ortiz.  I'm against that deal because I think 2 prospects rated that highly would be an overpay.  It seems to me, you agree.  You simply rate Ortiz lower.  Seems to me that the answer in such an impasse that would make both parties happy would be to replace Ortiz with another prospect that is lower rated than Ortiz -- which would be of equal value in your mind, since you rate Ortiz lower and still think the proposed trade is a fair one.  Make sense?  Maybe replace Ortiz with Norby.
    • I would definitely do Westburg  and Cowser.
    • 100% agree with you.  Especially when you haves waves of prospects coming up behind these guys.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Create New...